Review of the Code of Practice for Part 5 of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 and Related Issues: Analysis of Written Submissions to Consultation

DescriptionReport presents analysis of responses to a consultation exercise on the implementation of Part 5 of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000.
ISBN
Official Print Publication Date
Website Publication DateApril 01, 2003

    Listen

    Social Research logo

    2004

    Review of the Code of Practice for Part 5 of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 and Related Issues: Analysis of Written Submissions to Consultation

    Shirley Davidson
    Anne Mason
    Fran Wasoff
    Heather Wilkinson
    Hannah Drinkwater

    This document is also available in pdf format (392k)
    CONTENTS

    Acknowledgements

    Executive summary

    Chapter 1Introduction

    Chapter 2profile of respondents
    Table 2.1: Responses by interest group

    Chapter 3Summary of Responses

    Chapter 4 The Desirability of variable assessment
    Table 4.1: Support for variable assessment, by interest group
    Table 4.2: Interaction between treatment and familiarity

    Chapter 5 The need for an examination "today" for the Section 47 Certificate
    Table 5.1: Agreement or disagreement with the BMA's proposed wording, by interest group

    Chapter 6 The need for a certificate of incapacity when a proxy exists
    Table 6.1: Whether respondents agreed or disagreed with the need for a certificate when a proxy exists, by interest group

    Chapter 7Possible ectension of duration of the Section 47 Certificate
    Table 7.1: Views on maximum duration of certificate, by interest group

    Chapter 8 Allowing other healthcare professionals to sign certificates of incapacity
    Table 8.1: Who should be able to sign Section 47 Certificates, by interest group.

    Chapter 9The desirability of redefining medical treatment
    Table 9.1: Whether respondents agreed or disagreed that the definition of medical treatment used in the Act can be redefined

    Chapter 10Other comments made by respondents

    Chapter 11Summary of conclusions

    AppendixList of consultees

    The views expressed in this report are those of the researcher and
    do not necessarily represent those of the Department or Scottish Ministers.

    Further copies of this report are available priced 5.00. Cheques should be made payable to The Stationery Office Ltd and addressed to:

    The Stationery Office
    71 Lothian Road
    Edinburgh
    EH3 9AZ
    Tel: 0870 606 5566
    Fax: 0870 606 5588

      Page updated: Friday, January 23, 2009