This document is also available in pdf format (852k) CONTENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND TO THE RESEARCH AIMS AND OBJECTIVES CHAPTER TWO METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH STAGES IN THE DATA COLLECTION PROCESS ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS STAGE 1: PROCEDURES FOR SENDING OUT QUESTIONNAIRES STAGE 2: INTERVIEWS: TRAINERS, HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE PRACTITIONERS AND ORGANISATIONS STAGE 3: INTERVIEWS: RELATIVES AND CARERS OF ADULTS WITH INCAPACITY LIMITATIONS TO THE RESEARCH CHAPTER THREE TRAINING IN THE CASE STUDY AREAS FUNCTIONS OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES FUNCTIONS OF HEALTH BOARDS FUNCTIONS OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS INTERVIEWS WITH THE PERSONS WHO ARRANGED TRAINING ON THE ACT SUMMARY - TRAINING OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE PRACTITIONERS CHAPTER FOUR ANALYSIS OF POSTAL QUESTIONNAIRE DATA THE SAMPLE ANALYSIS OF QUESTIONNAIRES SUMMARY CHAPTER FIVE INTERVIEWS WITH PRACTITIONERS FROM HEALTH AND LOCAL AUTHORITY SECTORS AWARENESS: EXPERIENCES OF PROFESSIONALS SUMMARY - AWARENESS: EXPERIENCES OF PRACTITIONERS CHAPTER SIX THEMES ARISING FROM INTERVIEW DATA PROCEDURES RELATING TO SECTION 47 CERTIFICATES DEFINITION OF "TREATMENT" LAWFUL AUTHORITY BUREAUCRACY GOOD PRACTICE NEXT-OF-KIN CONSENT ASSESSMENT OF CAPACITY DESIRE FOR MORE TRAINING GENERAL PRACTITIONERS DENTAL TREATMENT SUMMARY CHAPTER SEVEN ISSUES FOR RELATIVES AND THE WIDER PUBLIC LACK OF AWARENESS ABOUT PART 5 ON THE PART OF RELATIVES ISSUES RAISED WITH RELEVANT ORGANISATIONS HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE PRACTITIONERS SUMMARY CHAPTER EIGHT CONCLUSIONS OPERATIONAL IMPACT OF PART 5 SUGGESTIONS MADE BY STUDY PARTICIPANTS LEVELS OF AWARENESS SUGGESTIONS MADE BY STUDY PARTICIPANTS ABOUT TRAINING FACTORS THAT MAY FACILITATE OR INHIBIT IMPLEMENTATION SUGGESTIONS MADE BY STUDY PARTICIPANTS ANNEX ONE OBTAINING ETHICAL APPROVALS APPROVAL FOR INCLUSION OF NHS STAFF, PATIENTS AND USERS, RELATIVES AND CARERS ANNEX TWO POSTAL QUESTIONNAIRE ANNEX THREE TOPIC GUIDE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE PROFESSIONALS ANNEX FOUR CONSENT FORM ANNEX FIVE INFORMATION BOOKLET FOR CARERS ANNEX SIX TOPIC GUIDE FOR CARER/RELATIVE LIST OF TABLESTable 2.1 Number of questionnaires sent out and numbers returned, by area Table 2.2 Numbers of respondents who took part in Stage 2, by profession Table 2.3 Voluntary organisations whose representatives were interviewed Table 2.4 Professional organisations whose representatives were interviewed Table 4.1 Number of questionnaires sent out and numbers returned, by area Table 4.2 Number and % of respondents, by area Table 4.3 Number of respondents by professional group, as a percentage of the whole Table 4.4 Number of respondents by area and profession Table 4.5 Sector in which respondents work Table 4.6 Sector in which respondents worked, by area Table 4.7 Length of service Table 4.8 Whether respondent thinks they will need to make use of the Act, by area Table 4.9 Use of different parts of the Act by those who said they might need to make use of the Act Table 4.10 Whether respondent will use Part 5 of the Act, by sector 30 Table 4.11 Hours of training Table 4.12 Hours training by sector 30 Table 4.13 How familiar with Part 5 of the Act and Code of Practice respondents feel, by area Table 4.14 How familiar with Part 5 of the Act and Code of Practice respondents feel, by sector Table 4.15 Respondents' experience of part 5 of the Act, by sector 33 Table 4.16 Respondents' experience of part 5 of the Act, by area Table 5.1 Numbers of respondents who took part in Stage 2, by profession Table A1.1 Number of days between obtaining MREC approval and obtaining local approvals, by LREC area Table A1.2 Number of days between obtaining MREC approval and obtaining local social work approvals, by local authority area ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors would like to express thanks to all the health and social care practitioners who took the time to complete the postal questionnaires sent out to them and to those who agreed to be interviewed as part of this study. Thanks are also due to the people who facilitated the sending out of the questionnaires. We are also grateful to those gatekeepers who introduced relatives of adults with incapacity to the study and to those relatives who agreed to be interviewed. Thanks also for the support received from the Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, Stirling University Department of Nursing and Midwifery and the research advisory group within the Scottish Executive. |