2| CO 2 sources
In this section, the principal industrial sources of CO 2 (power generation and industrial plant) in Scotland and NE England are identified, and the levels of output for sources in Scotland during 2006 are quantified. Likely levels of CO 2 output are then estimated for 2020, 2030 and 2040 by considering various energy generation mixes. This information is used to quantify CO 2 storage and transport requirements and to plan a network infrastructure that will respond to these requirements.
Figure 3
Relative proportions of CO 2 emitted by source in 2006 in the UK.

Scotland's total CO 2 emissions in 2006 were estimated to be 44 Mt, around 8% of the total UK emissions of approximately 557 Mt. The majority of the large fixed sources of CO 2 are power generation plants, which give rise to 33% (~184 Mt) of the UK total; integrated steel plants and the larger oil refinery/petrochemical complexes are further significant sources. Of the remaining sources of emissions, the largest single contribution was from transport (23.5%) (Figure 3).
All the major energy generators and industrial point sources of CO 2 in England, Wales and Scotland that emit more than 10, 000 tonnes of CO 2 per year report this output to the National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory ( NAEI) and the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency ( SEPA) (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Location of industrial sources of CO 2 emissions in Scotland and NE England that emitted more than 100, 000 tonnes per year in 2006.

In 2006, approximately 18 Mt of CO 2 (around 41% of Scotland's total carbon emissions) was produced by Scotland's three largest power stations. The output of Longannet alone is approximately 10 Mt. A combined total of 71 Mt of CO 2 (~24% of total UK fixed industrial) was produced by the top ten sites in Scotland and NE England (Figures 4 and 5).
Figure 5
Top ten CO 2 sources in Scotland and northern England in 2006.

For Scotland, the amount of CO 2 produced in the future will largely depend upon the method of energy generation and the relative proportions of types of energy supplied. Likely levels of CO 2 production were considered for 2010, 2020, 2030 and 2040. For 2010, it was assumed there would be little change in output from figures provided for 2006 (Figure 5). A range of scenarios for CO 2 production in 2020, 2030 and 2040 is summarised below (Figures 6, 7 and 8). For each of these years, different energy mixes were analysed, with no judgement as to which scenario was more likely, and a range of possibilities presented. (Tables 1, 2 and 3). The scenarios yield high, medium or low CO 2 output reflecting the different energy mixes. The examples shown in Figures 6, 7 and 8 assume that carbon capture technology is not installed. Note that if carbon capture equipment were installed, gross (prior to capture and storage) CO 2 output would be higher, by between approximately 12% ( CCS mature) and 25% ( CCS immature) reflecting the additional energy required to extract the CO 2 and purify it. However, the extra CO 2 produced by the carbon capture process will, by definition, be captured as part of this process and should not result in additional CO 2 being released into the atmosphere.
Figure 6
CO 2 output at 2020 for 11 Scottish scenarios.

Table 1
Proportions of different energy generation methods for each of the 11 scenarios possible for 2020.
Energy mix | Renewables % | Nuclear % | Coal % | Gas % | CO 2 output Mt |
|---|
1 | 30 | 15 | 45 | 10 | 23.6 |
2 | 30 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 23.3 |
3 | 40 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 19.9 |
4 | 50 | 0 | 35 | 15 | 19.7 |
5 | 30 | 15 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 18.3 |
6 | 40 | 15 | 22.5 | 22.5 | 15.1 |
7 | 50 | 15 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 11.7 |
8 | 30 | 35 | 0 | 35 | 6.4 |
9 | 40 | 35 | 0 | 25 | 4.7 |
10 | 65 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 3.8 |
11 | 50 | 35 | 0 | 15 | 2.8 |
Figure 7
CO 2 output at 2030 for 6 Scottish scenarios.

For 2030, CO 2 production was calculated on the basis of electricity demand as at present. Calculations assuming a year on year 1% increase of electricity demand from 2020
to 2030 were also carried out but did not change the ranking of energy mix scenarios.
Table 2
Proportions of different energy generation methods for each of the 6 scenarios possible for 2030.
Energy mix | Renewables % | Nuclear % | Coal % | Gas % | CO 2 output Mt |
|---|
1 | 40 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 15.1 |
2 | 50 | 0 | 35 | 15 | 14.1 |
3 | 40 | 15 | 22.5 | 22.5 | 11.5 |
4 | 50 | 15 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 8.9 |
5 | 30 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 8.9 |
6 | 40 | 35 | 0 | 25 | 4.6 |
Figure 8
CO 2 output at 2040 for 12 Scottish scenarios.

For 2040, CO 2 production was calculated on the basis of electricity demand as at present. Calculations assuming a year on year 1% increase in electricity demand from 2030 to 2040 were also carried out but did not change the ranking of energy mix scenarios.
Table 3
Proportions of different energy generation methods for each of the 12 scenarios possible for 2040.
Energy mix | Renewables % | Nuclear % | Coal % | Gas % | CO 2 output Mt |
|---|
1 | 40 | 0 | 55 | 5 | 18.6 |
2 | 40 | 0 | 40 | 20 | 16.5 |
3 | 50 | 0 | 35 | 15 | 14.1 |
4 | 40 | 0 | 20 | 40 | 13.7 |
5 | 50 | 0 | 20 | 30 | 11.9 |
6 | 40 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 11 |
7 | 60 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 10.1 |
8 | 50 | 15 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 8.8 |
9 | 40 | 35 | 0 | 25 | 4.6 |
10 | 60 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 4.6 |
11 | 50 | 35 | 0 | 15 | 2.8 |
12 | 60 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 2.8 |
CO 2 Sources-key conclusions
For Scotland over a 40-year period from 2010 to 2050, total output from electricity generation alone will produce CO 2 outputs of:
- ~ 700 Mt or 17.5 Mt/year under a high CO 2-output scenario;
- ~ 320 Mt or 8 Mt/year under a low CO 2-output scenario assuming no nuclear power.
Additional major sources in NE England produced ~50 Mt CO 2 in 2006. Thus, if outputs from both regions are included, over the period to 2050, up to 3000 Mt CO 2 is potentially available for capture and storage. This is equivalent to 75 Mt CO 2 per year taking this high-case scenario.