In 2007/08, a total of 2,254 criminal appeals were concluded in the High Court of Justiciary. This represents an increase of 6 per cent compared with 2006/07, but is still 30 per cent lower than the equivalent figure 10 years ago.
Table 1 shows that the number of completed appeals against decisions of the Sheriff Summary first instance courts showed no change between 2006/07 and 2007/08, remaining at just under 1,200 appeals. There was an increase of 30 per cent (from 164 to 214) for the District and Stipendiary Magistrate courts and 22 per cent (from 499 to 611) for the Sheriff Solemn Courts
Over the same period, the number of completed appeals against decisions of the High Court decreased by 10 per cent (from 296 to 267).
Table 1 Criminal appeals, by type of court of first instance, 1997/98-2007/08
Year | Number | Percentage of total |
|---|
Total (1) | High Court | Sheriff Solemn | Sheriff Summary | District (2) Court | High Court | Sheriff Solemn | Sheriff Summary | District (2) Court |
|---|
1997/98 | 3,255 | 232 | 316 | 2,332 | 375 | 7 | 10 | 72 | 12 |
|---|
1998/99 | 2,890 | 365 | 313 | 1,932 | 280 | 13 | 11 | 67 | 10 |
|---|
1999/00 | 3,414 | 348 | 425 | 2,277 | 364 | 10 | 12 | 67 | 11 |
|---|
2000/01 | 3,204 | 395 | 461 | 2,103 | 245 | 12 | 14 | 66 | 8 |
|---|
2001/02 | 3,249 | 393 | 460 | 2,161 | 235 | 12 | 14 | 67 | 7 |
|---|
2002/03 | 2,156 | 420 | 376 | 1,242 | 118 | 19 | 17 | 58 | 5 |
|---|
2003/04 | 2,679 | 458 | 481 | 1,548 | 189 | 17 | 18 | 58 | 7 |
|---|
2004/05 | 3,152 | 427 | 599 | 1,839 | 287 | 14 | 19 | 58 | 9 |
|---|
2005/06 | 2,825 | 437 | 612 | 1,533 | 242 | 15 | 22 | 54 | 9 |
|---|
2006/07 | 2,118 | 296 | 499 | 1,158 | 164 | 14 | 24 | 55 | 8 |
|---|
2007/08 | 2,254 | 267 | 611 | 1,161 | 214 | 12 | 27 | 52 | 9 |
|---|
1. Includes appeals where type of court of first instance not known.
2. Includes Stipendiary Magistrates Court.
Table 2, below, shows there have been small increases from 2006/07 to 2007/08 in all types of appeal.
Solemn Conviction and Summary Conviction appeals account for a similar proportion of the total as seen in previous years. Solemn Sentence only appeals stand at 31%, the highest figure from 1997/98 onwards. Summary Sentence only appeals stand at 50% of total appeals, the lowest figure from 1997/98 onwards and continuing the annual downward trend.
Table 2 Criminal appeals, by type of appeal, 1997/98-2007/08
Year | Number | Percentage of total |
|---|
Total (1) | Solemn Conviction (2) | Solemn Sentence only | Summary Conviction (2) | Summary Sentence only | Solemn Conviction (2) | Solemn Sentence only | Summary Conviction (2) | Summary Sentence only |
|---|
1997/98 | 3,255 | 106 | 441 | 337 | 2,368 | 3 | 14 | 10 | 73 |
|---|
1998/99 | 2,890 | 155 | 523 | 339 | 1,872 | 5 | 18 | 12 | 65 |
|---|
1999/00 | 3,414 | 181 | 592 | 382 | 2,257 | 5 | 17 | 11 | 66 |
|---|
2000/01 | 3,204 | 163 | 693 | 272 | 2,075 | 5 | 22 | 8 | 65 |
|---|
2001/02 | 3,249 | 147 | 706 | 311 | 2,083 | 5 | 22 | 10 | 64 |
|---|
2002/03 | 2,156 | 221 | 575 | 215 | 1,145 | 10 | 27 | 10 | 53 |
|---|
2003-04 | 2,679 | 187 | 755 | 316 | 1,421 | 7 | 28 | 12 | 53 |
|---|
2004-05 | 3,152 | 219 | 807 | 411 | 1,715 | 7 | 26 | 13 | 54 |
|---|
2005-06 | 2,825 | 232 | 818 | 315 | 1,460 | 8 | 29 | 11 | 52 |
|---|
2006/07 | 2,118 | 160 | 636 | 213 | 1,109 | 8 | 30 | 10 | 52 |
|---|
2007/08 | 2,254 | 173 | 706 | 241 | 1,133 | 8 | 31 | 11 | 50 |
|---|
1. Includes appeals relating to acquittals.
2. Includes appeals against conviction and sentence.
From Chart 1 it can be seen that between 2006/07 and 2007/08, there was an increase of 14 per cent (from 132 to 151 days) in the overall average duration of completed criminal appeals.

Chart 1: Table of information
Criminal appeals, by type of appeal and average duration (days), 1997/98 - 2007/08
Type of appeal | 1997/98 | 1998/99 | 1999/00 | 2000/01 | 2001/02 | 2002/03 | 2003/04 | 2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 |
|---|
Solemn conviction | 164.6 | 239.4 | 246.3 | 279.2 | 333.0 | 328.9 | 255.2 | 371.6 | 422.5 | 372.3 | 382.4 |
|---|
Solemn sentence | 85.6 | 80.3 | 103.9 | 121.4 | 102.4 | 127.2 | 150.3 | 173.2 | 215.9 | 162.3 | 157.7 |
|---|
Summary conviction | 69.8 | 128.0 | 158.2 | 114.8 | 295.7 | 375.7 | 308.5 | 323.8 | 157.8 | 129.4 | 220.2 |
|---|
Summary sentence | 40.2 | 34.2 | 49.3 | 51.2 | 51.2 | 65.6 | 110.3 | 137.5 | 71.8 | 79.3 | 96.0 |
|---|
All types | 53.4 | 64.5 | 81.4 | 83.4 | 98.5 | 139.9 | 155.1 | 186.9 | 152.3 | 131.6 | 150.6 |
|---|
The average duration of completed summary conviction appeals increased from 2006/07 by 70 per cent (from 129 to 220 days). This figure was markedly higher than the previous two years but showed a large reduction from 2004/05. The duration of summary sentence appeals increased by 21 per cent (from 79 to 96 days).
The average duration of completed solemn conviction appeals increased by 3 per cent (from 372 to 382 days) whilst solemn sentence appeals decreased by 3 per cent (from 162 to 158 days).
For types of first instance courts, shown in Chart 2, the average duration of appeals from Sheriff summary courts was up 33 per cent (from 85 to 112 days), while for District and Stipendiary Magistrates courts it increased by 39 per cent (from 106 to 147 days).
An increase of 6 per cent (from 311 to 331 days) was recorded in the average duration of appeals from High Court first instance, while the average duration for Sheriff Solemn courts was up by 3 per cent (from 141 to 146 days).

Chart 2: Table of information
Criminal appeals, by type of court of first instance and average duration (days), 1997/98 - 2007/08
| 1997/98 | 1998/99 | 1999/00 | 2000/01 | 2001/02 | 2002/03 | 2003/04 | 2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 |
|---|
High Court | 124.4 | 136.8 | 172.5 | 182.4 | 181.1 | 222.2 | 195.6 | 268.9 | 412.3 | 311.3 | 330.9 |
|---|
Sheriff Solemn | 108.3 | 93.2 | 84.3 | 82.1 | 95.3 | 139.7 | 148.4 | 177.6 | 152.8 | 141.3 | 145.8 |
|---|
Sheriff Summary | 63.0 | 47.1 | 43.5 | 65.0 | 57.0 | 102.8 | 141.4 | 167.5 | 87.1 | 84.7 | 112.4 |
|---|
District (incl stipendiary magistrates court) | 79.6 | 59.4 | 46.4 | 79.7 | 56.7 | 142.8 | 184.4 | 208.7 | 86.6 | 105.7 | 146.6 |
|---|
The majority (74 per cent) of appeals concluded in 2007/08 were completed within 6 months, a slight drop to the same proportion in 2006/07 (81 per cent). These figures corresponded with an increase from 13 per cent to 20 per cent for those completed which took between 6 months and one year. There was no change in the percentage completed in over one year.
Furthermore, 24 per cent of solemn conviction appeals concluded in 2007/08 took a year or more to complete. This was a decrease of 9 percentage points from 2006/07. At the same time 20per cent of summary conviction appeals concluded in 2007/08 took a year or more to complete, an increase of 15 percentage points from 2006/07.
The proportion of solemn sentence appeals taking a year or more to complete dropped from 8 per cent in 2006/07 to 5 per cent in 2007/08, whilst the corresponding proportion of summary sentence only appeals remained at 2 per cent.
NOTE: For the purposes of these statistics, the duration of an appeal case is measured from the date it was initially registered to the date it was determined. It should also be noted that the duration of a criminal appeal case will, in part, depend upon the time it takes for the Crown, and an appellant, to prepare their case. An appeal hearing date will not generally be allocated until both parties are ready to proceed.
Table 3 Criminal appeals against conviction and sentence, percentage by duration by type of appeal, 1997/98-2007/08
Year | Solemn conviction (1) | Solemn sentence | Summary conviction (1) | Summary sentence |
|---|
Up to 6 months | 6 months - 1 year | 1 year or more | Up to 6 months | 6 months - 1 year | 1 year or more | Up to 6 months | 6 months - 1 year | 1 year or more | Up to 6 months | 6 months - 1 year | 1 year or more |
|---|
1997/98 | 66 | 28 | 6 | 92 | 7 | 1 | 89 | 10 | 0 | 99 | 1 | 1 |
|---|
1998/99 | 58 | 22 | 20 | 92 | 6 | 2 | 77 | 4 | 19 | 97 | 1 | 1 |
|---|
1999/00 | 55 | 29 | 15 | 88 | 9 | 3 | 69 | 18 | 13 | 97 | 1 | 2 |
|---|
2000/01 | 57 | 17 | 26 | 89 | 8 | 2 | 71 | 26 | 2 | 97 | 2 | 1 |
|---|
2001/02 | 52 | 17 | 31 | 92 | 6 | 2 | 67 | 7 | 25 | 96 | 1 | 3 |
|---|
2002/03 | 40 | 28 | 33 | 90 | 8 | 3 | 62 | 1 | 36 | 95 | 3 | 2 |
|---|
2003/04 | 29 | 53 | 18 | 72 | 25 | 3 | 46 | 18 | 36 | 80 | 17 | 3 |
|---|
2004/05 | 39 | 16 | 45 | 69 | 21 | 10 | 39 | 24 | 37 | 70 | 24 | 6 |
|---|
2005/06 | 31 | 24 | 44 | 74 | 11 | 15 | 80 | 10 | 10 | 95 | 2 | 3 |
|---|
2006/07 | 40 | 27 | 33 | 78 | 14 | 8 | 77 | 18 | 5 | 89 | 9 | 2 |
|---|
2007/08 | 55 | 21 | 24 | 70 | 25 | 5 | 62 | 18 | 20 | 82 | 16 | 2 |
|---|
1. Includes appeals against conviction and sentence.
Chart 3, shows that of the 2,254 appeals concluded in 2007/08, 12 per cent related to conviction alone, 82 per cent to sentence alone and 5 per cent to both conviction and sentence.

Table 4 shows that the majority (67 per cent) of appeals involved persons who had been given a custodial sentence, while a further 21 per cent related to persons who had been fined.
The total of 2,254 completed appeals in 2007/08 was equivalent to around two per cent of the total number of persons convicted in criminal proceedings. From Table 4 it can be seen that as a proportion of all persons convicted, appeals were relatively more frequent in cases involving custodial sentences (8 per cent) than for fines or other types of sentence (1 per cent or less). This proportion also tended to increase with custodial sentence length: it was 5 per cent for sentences of up to 6 months compared to 60 per cent for cases involving sentences of 4 years and over.
Table 4 Criminal appeals, by main crime and disposal under appeal, 2007/08
Disposal before appeal | All crimes and offences (3) | Crimes of violence | Crimes of indecency | Crimes of dishonesty | Criminal damage | Drug offences | Other crimes | Common assault | Breach of the peace | Other misc. offences | Motor vehicle offences |
|---|
Total (1) | 2,254 | 299 | 254 | 318 | 75 | 225 | 226 | 73 | 193 | 65 | 503 |
|---|
Custody (2) | 1,514 | 275 | 180 | 277 | 51 | 199 | 185 | 62 | 104 | 34 | 141 |
|---|
Up to 6 months | 693 | 8 | 68 | 186 | 27 | 31 | 136 | 40 | 82 | 23 | 91 |
|---|
>6 months to 2 years | 382 | 66 | 54 | 64 | 15 | 60 | 35 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 47 |
|---|
> 2 to < 4 years | 188 | 55 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 60 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
|---|
4 years & over (including life) | 251 | 146 | 35 | 7 | 2 | 48 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
|---|
Community sentence | 135 | 6 | 35 | 18 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 2 | 27 | 6 | 16 |
|---|
Financial penalty | 474 | 5 | 22 | 13 | 16 | 12 | 12 | 5 | 45 | 17 | 326 |
|---|
Other sentence | 46 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 12 |
|---|
Percentage of persons with a charge proved (4) |
|---|
Total (1) | 2 | 13 | 30 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | * | 1 | * | 1 |
|---|
Custody (2) | 8 | 22 | 95 | 5 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 11 |
|---|
Up to 6 months | 5 | 4 | 100 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 10 |
|---|
>6 months to 2 years | 16 | 11 | 93 | 14 | 24 | 17 | 14 | 6 | 26 | 8 | 17 |
|---|
> 2 to 4 years | 32 | 22 | 64 | 33 | 70 | 32 | 75 | 21 | 83 | 17 | 50 |
|---|
4 years & over (including life) | 60 | 62 | 56 | 47 | 50 | 61 | 100 | 22 | 100 | 33 | - |
|---|
Community sentence | 1 | 1 | 15 | * | 1 | * | 1 | * | 1 | * | 1 |
|---|
Financial penalty | 1 | 2 | 12 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 1 |
|---|
Other sentence | * | 2 | 2 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 1 |
|---|
- Nil * Less than 0.5
1. Includes disposal not known
2. Includes sentence length not known.
3. Includes type of offence not known.
4. Percentages based on the number of persons with a charge proved in 2006/07.
Chart 4 and Table 5 provides information on the outcomes of appeals. Of the total number of appeals completed in 2007/08, 61 per cent were refused at the sift stage or abandoned, while a further 15 per cent were dismissed. The remainder comprised appeals which were sustained, either in relation to an appeal against a conviction (3 per cent) or to an appeal against sentence (20 per cent). The overall proportion of appeals which were sustained remained similar to the previous year with the highest rate being for cases from the District and Stipendiary Magistrates Courts (34 per cent) and lowest for cases from the Sheriff Summary Courts (21 per cent).

Table 5 Criminal appeals, by outcome, 1997/98 - 2007/08
Year | Number | Percentage of total |
|---|
Total (1) | Appeal sustained | Dismissed | Abandoned (3) | Appeal sustained | Dismissed | Abandoned (3) |
|---|
Conviction (2) | Sentence | Conviction (2) | Sentence |
|---|
1997-98 | 3,255 | 53 | 470 | 759 | 1,964 | 2 | 14 | 23 | 60 |
|---|
1998-99 | 2,890 | 45 | 379 | 664 | 1,792 | 2 | 13 | 23 | 62 |
|---|
1999-00 | 3,414 | 58 | 375 | 627 | 2,337 | 2 | 11 | 18 | 68 |
|---|
2000-01 | 3,204 | 49 | 318 | 694 | 2,137 | 2 | 10 | 22 | 67 |
|---|
2001-02 | 3,249 | 87 | 384 | 609 | 2,167 | 3 | 12 | 19 | 67 |
|---|
2002-03 | 2,156 | 69 | 346 | 435 | 1,302 | 3 | 16 | 20 | 60 |
|---|
2003-04 | 2,679 | 111 | 422 | 542 | 1,604 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 60 |
|---|
2004-05 | 3,152 | 174 | 722 | 788 | 1,468 | 6 | 23 | 25 | 47 |
|---|
2005-06 | 2,825 | 151 | 598 | 519 | 1,557 | 5 | 21 | 18 | 55 |
|---|
2006-07 | 2,118 | 96 | 350 | 316 | 1,353 | 5 | 17 | 15 | 64 |
|---|
2007/08 | 2,254 | 76 | 462 | 339 | 1,376 | 3 | 20 | 15 | 61 |
|---|
1. Includes a small number of other sustained appeals.
2. Includes appeals against conviction and sentence.
3. Includes appeals refused at sift stage.
NOTES
1. Any person convicted of a criminal offence in Scotland by a court of first instance may appeal to the High Court of Justiciary sitting as the court of criminal appeal, usually subject to the granting of leave to appeal. Convicted persons may appeal against their conviction; against sentence; or against both conviction and sentence.
2. Applications for leave to appeal are considered first by a judge of the High Court, who decides whether the papers produced disclose arguable grounds of appeal (a procedure generally known as the "first sift"). If leave to appeal is refused the convicted person may apply to the High Court for leave to appeal. This involves a reconsideration of the papers by, two (in sentence appeals) or three judges (conviction appeals), who must once again decide whether the papers disclose arguable grounds of appeal.
3. The Lord Advocate has a right to appeal against a sentence on grounds of undue leniency. The Lord Advocate may also refer a point of law which has arisen in relation to a solemn case for the opinion of the High Court (although this procedure does not affect any acquittal or conviction in the case concerned)..
4. The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission ( SCCRC) was established on 1 April 1999 to review and investigate cases of alleged miscarriage of justice in Scotland. Where the Commission believes, after proper investigation, that a miscarriage of justice may have occurred, and that it is in the interests of justice to do so, it may refer a case to the High Court for review. Once a case is referred, the High Court will determine the case as if it was a normal appeal.
5. The year in which an appeal is counted is the year in which it was concluded. This is not necessarily the same as the year in which the appeal was lodged, nor the year in which sentence was passed in the original court case. Incompetent appeals and certain types of procedural appeal, such as those which are for an extension of time on an existing appeal, are excluded from the figures.
6. Trends over recent years in the number and average duration of completed criminal appeals have been influenced by a number of factors. A judicial direction in September 2002 meant that priority was given to dealing with solemn conviction appeals. The amount of court time allocated with dealing with that class of appeal was therefore increased from 19 court weeks in 2001 to 26 in 2002. With the demands of trial and civil court business on judicial time, and efforts to conclude longstanding appeal cases, this resulted in delays and backlogs in dealing with other types of criminal appeals business. Additional resources in the form of temporary judges were, however, made available in January 2004 to help deal with the backlog of appeals.
7. The statistics published in this Statistics Release are derived from information provided by the High Court of Justiciary. They reflect the information as held at 15 August 2008. Any revisions to the data will be reported in future Statistics Releases.
8. The statistics for January 2003 onwards were derived from an electronic data extract from the High Court of Justiciary's appeals case management system. This method of data collection replaced the set of manually completed paper returns used to collect the data for previous years. While this new method of data collection is believed to be inherently more accurate than the previous one, the change to it may have resulted in a slight discontinuity between the figures for 2003-04 and those for earlier years.
9. This Statistics Release may be viewed on the Scottish Government Internet Web site: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/stats/bulletins/00691.
SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT STATISTICIAN GROUP
OUR AIM
To provide relevant and reliable information, analysis and advice that meets the needs of government, business and the people of Scotland.
OBJECTIVES
1. To produce statistics and analysis relevant to user needs by
- Developing our understanding of customer requirements to ensure statistics are kept relevant and analysis is well targeted;
- Developing the range of statistics and analysis we produce;
- Where practicable improving timeliness;
- Providing more statistics disaggregated by age, gender and ethnicity;
- Developing more data for small areas through the Neighbourhood Statistics project;
- Contributing to production of comparable statistics across the UK and internationally.
2. To ensure effective use of our statistics by
- Contributing more directly to policy processes inside and where possible outside government;
- Improving access to and presentation of data and analysis;
- Improving the advice provided on statistics.
3. To work effectively with users and providers by
- Maintaining arrangements to consult and involve users and providers;
- Involving users and providers in planning developments in outputs and processes;
- Minimising the burden on data providers through dropping or streamlining collections as appropriate, to ensure the benefits of the information justify the costs of collection.
4. To develop the quality of statistics by
- Assuring and improving quality as an integral part of data collection and analysis and through regular reviews in line with National Statistics quality strategy;
- Developing statistical methods, systems and classifications;
- Working with the rest of the Government Statistical Service to develop joint approaches/solutions where appropriate.
5. To assure the integrity of statistics by
- Maintaining and promoting integrity through implementation of the National Statistics Code of Practice and related protocols;
- Safeguarding the confidentiality of data subjects.
6. To ensure the efficient and effective delivery of statistics products and services by
- Making best use of all sources including administrative sources;
- Working with other analysts to maximise the contribution of our own and other analysts' work;
- Ensuring value for money;
- Making best use of Information and Communications Technology;
- Ensuring effective communication within the Statistician Group.
7. To develop our workforce and competences
- Ensuring recruitment of staff with the necessary skills and potential;
- Ensuring development of expertise amongst existing staff;
- Promoting and upholding the standards of the statistics profession.
This is a National Statistics publication
"This is a National Statistics publication. It has been produced to high professional standards set out in the National Statistics Code of Practice Protocol - see www.statistics.gov.uk/about_ns/cop/default.asp
These statistics undergo regular quality assurance reviews to ensure that they meet customer needs. They are produced free from any political interference."
Details of pre-release access will be provided in the Scottish Government Statistics Website under 'Forthcoming Releases'
Correspondence and enquiries
Enquiries on Criminal Appeal Statistics should be addressed to:
Stuart Riddell
Scottish Government Justice Analytical Services
Court Affairs, Prisons and Offenders team
Area GWR St. Andrew's House
Edinburgh EH1 3DGTelephone: (0131) 244 1845; Fax: (0131) 244 2109
e-mail: stuart.riddell@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
General enquiries on Scottish Government statistics can be addressed to:
Angela McLean
Office of the Chief Statistician
Scottish Government
3 Floor West Rear, St Andrews House
EDINBURGH EH1 3DGTelephone: (0131) 244 0442; Fax: (0131) 244 2223
e-mail: statistics.enquiries@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
Advice on specific areas of Scottish Government statistical work can be obtained from staff at the telephone numbers given below:
Scottish Government Statistics contacts
| Agricultural census and labour force | (0131) 244 6150 |
Business | (0141) 242 5446 |
Community Care | (0131) 244 3777 |
Courts and law | (0131) 244 2227 |
Environment | (0131) 244 0445 |
Equality | (0131) 244 0324 |
Fisheries | (0131) 244 6441 |
Further and Higher Education | (0141) 242 0273 |
Health | (0131) 244 3432 |
Housing | (0131) 244 7236 |
Income, Tax and Benefits | (0131) 244 2583 |
Labour market | (0141) 242 5446 |
Local government finance | (0131) 244 7033 |
Planning | (0131) 244 0439 |
Prisons | (0131) 244 2147 |
Recorded crime | (0131) 244 2635 |
Schools - pupils and teachers | (0131) 244 1689 |
Schools - qualifications | (0131) 244 0315 |
Scottish Government personnel | (0131) 244 3926 |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics | (0131) 244 0442 |
The Economy | (0131) 244 2234 |
Transport | (0131) 244 7255 |
Other contacts for Scottish statistics
Forestry Commission | (0131) 314 6337 |
General Register Office for Scotland - Vital statistics and publications - Population statistics, census statistics or digital boundary products | (0131) 314 4243 (0131) 314 4254
|
The Scottish Funding Councils for Higher and Further Education | (0131) 313 6575 |
You can also find National Statistics on the internet - go to www.statistics.gov.uk
If you would like to be consulted about new or existing statistical collections or receive notification of forthcoming statistical publications, please register your interest on the Scottish Government ScotStat website at www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Statistics/scotstat
Current contact points, e-mail addresses and the publications listed below as well as a range of other statistical publications can be found on the Scottish Government Web site at www.scotland.gov.uk/stats
Further information on the General Register Office for Scotland is available on the website www.gro-scotland.gov.uk
Most recent Justice Statistical Publications relating to the Crime and Justice theme
Ref no. | Title | Last published | Price |
|---|
978 0 7559 7114 5 | Firearm Certificates Statistics, Scotland, 2007 | May 08 | |
|---|
978 0 7559 7129 9 | Drug Seizure Statistics, Scotland, 2006-07 | June 08 | |
|---|
978 0 7559 7130 5 | Criminal Proceedings in Scottish Courts, 2006/07 | June 08 | |
|---|
978 0 7559 7144 2 | Reconvictions of Offenders Discharged from Custody or Given Non-Custodial Sentences in 2004-05 and 2005-06, Scotland | June 08 | |
|---|
978 0 7559 7188 6 | Scottish Liquor licensing statistics 2007 | August 08 | |
|---|
978 0 7559 7189 9 | Prison Statistics Scotland, 2007/08 | August 08 | |
|---|
978 0 7559 7231 9 | Recorded Crime in Scotland, 2007-08 | September 08 | |
|---|
Additional copies of these publications may be purchased from Scottish Government Publication Sales, Blackwell's Bookshop, 53 South Bridge, Edinburgh, EH1 1YS, Telephone: 0131 622 8283 or 0131 622 8258, Fax: 0131 557 8149. Cheques should be made payable to 'Blackwell's Bookshop'.
Complaints and suggestions
If you are not satisfied with our service, please write to the Chief Statistician, Mr Rob Wishart, 3R.01, St Andrews House, Edinburgh, EH1 3DG, Telephone: (0131) 244 0302, e-mail rob.wishart@scotland.gsi.gov.uk . We also welcome any comments or suggestions that would help us to improve our standards of service.
ISSN 0264 1178
ISBN 978 0 7559 7280
Crown Copyright
Brief extracts from the Crown Copyright material in this publication may be reproduced provided the source is fully acknowledged.