APPENDIX 9 COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-BUY IMPACTS
SQW summary table of reported "major" impacts by type of project (percentage of respondents).
| Mainstream Community Land | Environmental & recreation | Plot or block of land | Buildings and immediate site | No acquisition | Average across all project types |
|---|
Engagement/ participation of community as a whole | 67% | 50% | 48% | 62% | 58% | 57% |
|---|
Community Empowerment - sense of neighbourhood and ownership | 89% | 50% | 48% | 55% | 53% | 56% |
|---|
Quality of life - Access to facilities/amenities | 56% | 50% | 55% | 55% | 21% | 48% |
|---|
Strengthening social networks | 56% | 25% | 34% | 48% | 21% | 38% |
|---|
Landscaping and environmental improvements | 56% | 25% | 48% | 38% | 16% | 38% |
|---|
Quality of life - Security of tenure | 33% | 0% | 45% | 41% | 26% | 37% |
|---|
Skills and capacity building of individuals and groups | 56% | 50% | 28% | 41% | 26% | 36% |
|---|
Protection of heritage | 56% | 25% | 28% | 38% | 26% | 33% |
|---|
Inclusion of hard to reach groups e.g. elderly, disabled, low income | 33% | 0% | 31% | 48% | 11% | 31% |
|---|
Fundraising | 33% | 0% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 31% |
|---|
Fresh income streams either to local businesses or groups | 44% | 25% | 14% | 38% | 5% | 23% |
|---|
Job creation | 33% | 0% | 14% | 31% | 16% | 21% |
|---|
Protection of wildlife diversity | 56% | 56% | 25% | 21% | 3% | 5% |
|---|
Education for all | 22% | 25% | 10% | 28% | 5% | 17% |
|---|
Energy efficiency | 33% | 0% | 7% | 21% | 5% | 11% |
|---|
New businesses | 11% | 0% | 7% | 21% | 5% | 11% |
|---|
Source: SQW (2005: Table 3.10, p28)