NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY
i. As part of the preparation of the National Planning Framework ( NPF), the Scottish Government is carrying out a Strategic Environmental Assessment ( SEA). SEA is a systematic method for considering the likely environmental effects of certain plans, programmes or strategies produced by public sector organisations. It aims to:
- Integrate environmental factors into policy and decision making;
- Improve policies, and enhance environmental protection;
- Increase public participation in decision making; and
- Facilitate openness and transparency of decision making.
ii. SEA is required by the Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Act 2005. The key stages of the NPFSEA to date have been as follows:
- Scoping. A Scoping Report was prepared and submitted to the Consultation Authorities (Scottish Natural Heritage, Scottish Environment Protection Agency, and Historic Scotland) in February 2007. This set out the intended scope and level of detail to be included in the Environmental Report, and the proposed consultation periods. The Scoping Report was also published for general public information on the NPF website.
- Interim Assessment of Alternatives. The findings of the initial assessment of alternatives were published in Summer 2007 on the NPF website and sent to the Consultation Authorities for discussion. The purpose of the report was to ensure that consultees had an early opportunity to consider and comment on several high level policy options, which were considered during the drafting of the NPF itself. This paper remains open for consultation, and has been supplemented by a short paper describing the alternatives which have been taken forward in the preparation of the draft NPF.
- Environmental Report. This NTS reflects the content of the Environmental Report, which in turn describes and evaluates the likely significant environmental effects of the Discussion Draft NPF, allowing for comparison with the alternatives which were considered during the policy preparation process.
CONSULTATION ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT AND DISCUSSION DRAFT NATIONAL PLANNING FRAMEWORK
iii. A key purpose of the Environmental Report is to equip consultees with the environmental information they need to respond to the NPF consultation in an informed way. The Environmental Report is currently available for the public to view and respond to. The consultation period will run until 15 th April 2008. Responses should be directed to the NPF Team in writing, either by email or in hard copy. Contact details can be found at the end of the document. To help structure responses, consultees are invited to consider the following questions. Consultees should, however, also feel free to comment more generally on its content if they would prefer to do so.
- Do you disagree with any of the assessment findings?
- Should any further baseline evidence, wider environmental policies or sources of information be taken into account?
- Do you have concerns about significant or cumulative environmental effects on particular areas or environmental resources?
- Are there opportunities to limit the adverse effects of the NPF that have not so far been noted in the proposals for mitigation?
- Can the NPF deliver more positive aims and aspirations for the environment in the long term?
iv. When the consultation period has closed, all comments and responses will be reviewed and taken into account in the revision of the NPF itself. Adoption of the finalised NPF is expected to take place towards the end of 2008. At that time a Post Adoption SEA Statement will be published which sets out the way in which consultation comments have been taken into account, and provides commitments to future monitoring of predicted environmental effects. It is currently proposed that this should be built into future monitoring and review of the NPF.
OUTLINE OF THE CONTENTS AND MAIN OBJECTIVES OF THE DISCUSSION DRAFT NPF
v. The second NPF provides a Scotland-wide perspective on planning. It identifies the high-level and long-term issues that are relevant to planning in Scotland, including sustainable economic growth and the need to reduce and adapt to climate change, and defines a spatial strategy for the period to 2030. This includes a commitment to city-driven economic growth, whilst maintaining environmental quality. The Discussion Draft NPF also sets out priorities for improving transport connections between the main cities, international gateways and areas for economic growth. The Discussion Draft NPF identifies planning priorities for each part of Scotland:
- Central Belt: collaboration between Edinburgh and Glasgow to promote the Central Belt in a coherent way. Ensuring sufficient land is available for housing, and investment in transport and environmental infrastructure to support planned development. Continuing commitments to urban regeneration, particularly the Clyde Waterfront and Gateway. Long-term creation of a strategic green network.
- East Coast: improved transport connections between cities and better links with the rest of Europe. Recognition of the importance of small and medium sized towns, and coastal conservation and management. Strengthening of Aberdeen's role as a northern gateway to Scotland and ongoing regeneration in Dundee.
- Highlands and Islands: recognition of the importance of environmental quality. Providing development infrastructure to support planned population growth. Development of Inverness as the Highland Capital, and growth along the A96 corridor. Port and canal development for timber and wider freight transport. Targeted support for peripheral rural areas and islands.
- Ayrshire and the South West: Developing the area's gateway role by continuing to improve connections by air, sea, road and rail. Regeneration of towns and environmental improvements in former mining areas.
- South of Scotland: promoting the area as a vibrant rural economy. Strategic transport, water and drainage infrastructure improvements to expand capacity to accommodate growth. Environmental improvements along the M74 corridor and expansion of native woodland. Continuing support for further education facilities.
vi. The NPF identifies nine 'National Developments'. These are proposed under the provisions of the Planning etc. (Scotland) Act, 2006. Their confirmation in the final NPF would establish the need for them, but their precise siting and design would require further consideration and assessment through development plans, development management and environmental impact assessments. The National Developments included in the Discussion Draft NPF are:
- Replacement Forth Crossing.
- Edinburgh Airport Enhancement.
- Glasgow Airport Enhancement.
- Grangemouth Freight Hub.
- Rosyth International Container Terminal.
- Scapa Flow International Container Transhipment Facility.
- Grid Reinforcements for renewable energy development.
- The Glasgow Strategic Drainage Scheme.
- 2014 Commonwealth Games Facilities.
CURRENT STATE OF THE SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT, AND EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES.
vii. Scotland has a unique environment, with a wide range of natural and cultural features which together play an important role in defining national identity.
viii. Scotland's total population has increased in recent years as a result of in-migration, although some parts of the country have continued to experience population loss. Household sizes have decreased, and their characteristics vary significantly within and between local authority areas. In some parts of the country there is high demand for affordable housing. There are particular concentrations of social, economic and health deprivation in Glasgow, North and South Lanarkshire, and Edinburgh. Scotland's overall health record is poor.
ix. Scotland has many natural areas and features which are recognised and safeguarded at the international, national and local levels for their special qualities. Special Protection Areas ( SPAs) and Special Areas of Conservation ( SACs) together make up Scotland's Natura 2000 network. In addition, Ramsar sites, National Nature Reserves ( NNRs) and Sites of Special Scientific Interest ( SSSIs) are of national significance for biodiversity. Around three quarters of the special features of nature conservation sites are in 'favourable' condition but many of our natural resources are under growing pressure, and further work is needed to safeguard them for future generations. Scotland's biodiversity will be affected by climate change during the period covered by the NPF, with some important habitats in danger of being lost or becoming more fragmented, with particular consequences for some species.
x. Scotland's identity and history is reflected in its many listed buildings, conservation areas and scheduled monuments. There are many more remains, buildings and townscapes which have not been formally designated for protection, but which together make our landscapes and settlements attractive and distinctive. Scotland's mountains, moorlands and coasts are particularly renowned and distinctive at a national scale, but are subject to constant pressure for change.
xi. Scotland has generally good quality soil resources, but they can be adversely affected by both natural and human activities. Soil sealing and erosion are of particular concern, and there is a continuing need to address longstanding problems with contamination on vacant and derelict sites. This problem has declined substantially in the last decade, largely as a result of targeted regeneration and development. Scotland has good air quality overall, but there continues to be a need to monitor this and prioritise action in targeted areas where pollution is highest.
xii. Up to one third of Scotland's water bodies may not reach water quality targets by 2015, unless action is taken to address a wide range of pressures on them. Flooding is a continuing challenge which requires a long-term perspective to avoid exacerbating existing problems and to anticipate the additional effects of climate change. Scotland has a rich marine environment and an attractive but often vulnerable coastline.
xiii. The effects of climate change are already becoming apparent. Longer term predictions include substantial increases in levels of rainfall, reduced snowfall, changing temperatures, and increased risk of storms and high winds. These effects will vary between different parts of the country and seasons. International commitments to reducing emissions which contribute to climate change and the need to also adapt to its effects, provide a challenging context for the NPF. Partly in response to this challenge, Scotland is on course to meet its waste recycling targets, and there has been a substantial increase in the amount of energy generated from cleaner, renewable and natural sources. Our transport patterns, however, remain unsustainable, with road transport accounting for 29% of our total energy consumption with a continuing growth in road and air travel and decline in bus and rail passenger numbers.
xiv. The key environmental challenges taken into account in the assessment of the NPF are as follows:
- Decline in overall areas of semi-natural habitats and a continuing need to ensure that protected sites are in favourable condition. Climate change, urban development and other processes are leading to habitat loss and fragmentation. Habitat connectivity will become more important as climate change progresses.
- Growing numbers of households and changing household structures, together with a new impetus to deliver increased housing in a sustainable way, and an ongoing need to reduce social deprivation and health inequalities.
- Soil sealing, which interferes with the ability of the land to process water, increasing flood risk and depleting groundwater flows. Soil erosion is also a concern.
- Pressure on water bodies. Flooding is a longstanding problem in parts of Scotland, which may be exacerbated by further development, infrastructure expansion and climate change.
- Climate change, requiring further mitigation and adaptation responses. Scotland's wetter winters and warmer drier summers could undermine quality of life if we do not begin to adapt to them.
- A continuing rise in emissions from the energy and transport sectors, despite our commitment to reducing them. There continues to be a need to generate more energy from renewable sources and reducing road and air transport by increasing our use of public transport, walking and cycling.
- Localised air quality problems.
- A continuing need to reclaim and reuse vacant and derelict land.
- Loss or damage to the historic environment as a result of inappropriate development.
- Landscape change leading to loss of character and distinctiveness.
xv. If the NPF were not revised, many of these existing environmental trends might continue. This includes continuing growth in greenhouse gas emissions, and threats to biodiversity. Whilst there might continue to be progress towards achieving some environmental targets, such as air and water quality, the contribution of planning to these environmental objectives may prove to be limited without clear strategic direction. Some positive environmental policies, such as green networks and woodland expansion, might prove more difficult to achieve in practice, without the support of the NPF.
WIDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OBJECTIVES
xvi. The Discussion Draft NPF draws together a range of Government policies to provide a coherent vision for Scotland's long-term development, cutting across the full range of policy topics. This includes a broader framework of environmental protection commitments and goals. Many of these objectives have been set at the international and national levels.
xvii. Key objectives of relevance to the NPF include:
- Protection of priority habitats and species, improving and maintaining the condition of features for which sites have been designated.
- A duty of biodiversity protection and enhancement.
- A need to provide sufficient land to meet the housing needs of growing number of households, and to meet affordable housing needs.
- A right of responsible access to land and inland water bodies.
- Reducing social deprivation, and achieving community regeneration in targeted areas.
- Improving health through increased physical activity, and reducing health inequalities.
- Improving the ecological quality of water bodies, by protecting them from the adverse effects of development, securing sustainable water supplies and drainage infrastructure and taking forward the measures identified in river basin management plans.
- Addressing current and future flood risk by identifying sustainable solutions, and avoiding contributing to risk by inappropriately located or designed development.
- Protecting soil from sealing, erosion, pollution and loss of organic quality.
- Maintaining and improving air quality, by reducing harmful emissions.
- Reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, particularly CO 2, and adapting to climate change as it progresses.
- Reducing emissions from the transport sector, by encouraging people to use more sustainable public transport options, and supporting sea and rail freight options.
- Reducing energy sector emissions by increasing renewable energy generation. Developing options for carbon capture and storage to support this.
- Meeting targets for waste recycling and composting, and continuing to reduce the proportion of waste which goes to landfill.
- Continuing to reclaim and reuse derelict and vacant land, including areas which have been contaminated by previous activity.
- Protecting heritage resources, including listed buildings, conservation areas, scheduled monuments and historic gardens and designed landscapes, from the adverse effects of development.
- Protecting landscapes and enhancing those which have previously been degraded.
- Valuing and respecting environmental resources which contribute to quality of life and sense of place, including local and undesignated wildlife sites, unlisted historic buildings, archaeological remains, and wider townscapes and landscapes.
OUTLINE OF METHODS FOR UNDERTAKING THE ASSESSMENT
xviii. Having established the current state of the environment and reviewed the wider policies which are relevant to the NPF, the assessment brought together key environmental issues and policy objectives to provide a series of SEA criteria against which the NPF could be measured. These formed a structure for the assessment: each of the key policies and proposals with the Discussion Draft NPF was considered in turn, and positive, negative or neutral effects on the environment were predicted as far as possible. Further sourcing of relevant environmental information was undertaken as the assessment progressed, including more detailed information which helped to refine and focus the assessment of the proposed National Developments.
xix. At an early stage in the SEA process, a series of high level alternatives was identified and considered for inclusion in the Discussion Draft. The effects of these alternatives were assessed, and used to inform the eventual selection of preferred policy options. An interim paper was produced which describes these policy alternatives and sets out their environmental effects. These options remain open for debate, and a supplementary paper can be accessed by consultees from the NPF website. This paper also defines which of the alternatives have been taken forward in the Discussion Draft, and which have been wholly or partially excluded, and explains the reasons for these decisions.
KEY FINDINGS FROM THE ASSESSMENT AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
xx. The NPF is seeking to advance sustainable economic development. In developing the NPF, the Scottish Government has sought to produce a spatial strategy which balances environmental objectives with the need to accommodate population, business and infrastructure growth over the coming years. The environmental assessment identified the following effects from the Discussion Draft NPF:
Issue 1. . | The Discussion Draft NPF is expected to have both positive and negative effects on biodiversity. Many of these may only become apparent as the strategy is taken forward through strategic and local development plans. The NPF reiterates a commitment to safeguarding biodiversity through planning, and notes the importance of the natural environment in contributing to quality of life. It includes proposals for strategic green networks and environmental enhancement for the long term, which could improve links between important ecological sites. Broader environmental objectives could provide secondary benefits for biodiversity. More negative effects, however, might be expected from some of the specific developments identified in the Draft NPF. This includes adverse effects from strategic transport infrastructure improvements on some sites and habitat networks. Taking into account the proposed national developments and strategic development proposals to the west of Edinburgh, potential effects on the protected area of the Firth of Forth require particular attention. The assessment notes that the coast and marine environment may also be vulnerable as a result of proposals for shipping and renewable energy generation and transmission infrastructure. |
Mitigation | The Discussion Draft NPF has already been reviewed with a view to strengthening its contribution to biodiversity policy objectives and minimising its effects. Possible conflicts with biodiversity have been identified in the text and in the Environmental Report, and local authorities are encouraged to consider them further in development plans. Assessment of the ecological effects of national developments will be undertaken at the design and assessment stages for each of the projects. |
Issue 2. | The NPF will help to reduce some social and health problems, by supporting community regeneration, and playing a role in securing an appropriate supply of land to meet a range of housing needs. Benefits will arise from an ongoing commitment to reducing the amount of derelict land, and may be more significant for urban as compared to rural communities. Secondary benefits are expected from components of the NPF which aim to promote economic development (and therefore reduce social deprivation) and achieve broader environmental protection for soil, water and air quality. The assessment suggests that some, if not all, of the proposed national developments could have long-term positive effects, but temporary adverse effects on communities, with the latter particularly arising during construction and requiring appropriate mitigation. |
Mitigation | The potentially adverse temporary effects of some of the national developments should be identified and mitigated through development plans and proposals and their associated SEAs and EIAs. This will be a particular challenge for the siting and design of the Forth Replacement Crossing, enhancement of Edinburgh and Glasgow Airports, and the reinforcement of the electricity transmission system. |
Issue 3. | The NPF contributes to climate change mitigation by promoting carbon capture projects, supporting delivery of renewable energy and encouraging a shift towards the use of more sustainable modes of transport in order to reduce harmful emissions. However, these positive measures are balanced by other aspects of the policy, including established transport infrastructure commitments and a general emphasis on improving connectivity both within Scotland, and between Scotland and the rest of the world. Some of the national developments raise issues in relation to the climate change mitigation agenda, as they support road, air and sea transport, which can generate harmful emissions. Some climate change adaptation measures have been built into the Discussion Draft, but these have been limited by ongoing uncertainty about the nature and scale of impacts of climate change and the form which adaptation should take. Climate change adaptation measures of a national scale have therefore proven difficult to assimilate into the policy, although opportunities for improved national habitat networks, sustainable water and flood management and sustainable settlement patterns should set a positive context for development plans. There may be scope to reflect further adaptation measures within the Finalised Draft NPF or in later versions of the policy, as it develops. |
Mitigation | The NPF has already sought to take on board measures which address climate change, including support for a shift to renewable energy generation, and an emphasis on sustainable transport. Adaptation is promoted through measures such as strategic habitat networks, which will rely on innovative and effective local delivery to provide significant benefits. Development plans (and futures revisions of the NPF) will play an important role in taking forward adaptation measures as they are identified. |
Issue 4. | The NPF could lead to loss or damage to some of Scotland's soil resources, particularly as a result of potential development on greenfield land, although the significance of these effects cannot be clearly identified at this level. Some benefits for soil may be achieved as a result of proposed wider environmental enhancement measures and commitments to reducing pollution. Soil resources in different areas may be positively or negatively affected by the NPF. The national developments could lead to loss of some greenfield land and soil sealing, and this could have repercussions for other environmental resources including habitats and the water environment. |
Mitigation | Mitigation measures to protect soil as far as possible have been built into the Discussion Draft NPF, including continuing prioritisation of development on brownfield land to help minimise land take in areas that are currently undeveloped. Development plans have an important role to play in continuing to apply this principle at a local level, and in steering development away from particularly vulnerable and valuable soil resources, such as prime agricultural land. SEA, EIA and development management should also seek to minimise the effects of national developments on soils. |
Issue 5. | The NPF could have mixed effects on the water environment. Inland water related issues include potential cumulative effects of developments on current and future flood risk and diffuse pollution, and a need for a sustainable approach to securing water supplies. The NPF goes some way towards responding to this challenge by noting the need for strategic infrastructure investment in some areas. The Glasgow Strategic Drainage Scheme represents good practice in water and drainage management, which can deliver a range of environmental benefits. The assessment identifies particular challenges for coastal and marine environments, particularly if they are to accommodate renewable energy developments and an increase in shipping activity. Given that these proposals seek to contribute to climate change commitments by promoting more sustainable patterns of freight transport and increasing renewable energy generation, the assessment suggests that their more localised environmental effects may be acceptable, and to a large extent manageable through good project design and assessment, and ongoing regulatory measures. |
Mitigation | The NPF supports water and drainage infrastructure enhancement which should help to minimise adverse effects from developments on the water environment. Development plans and development management should seek to mitigate potential cumulative effects of urban development on the inshore water environment. The NPF supports integrated coastal and marine planning and emphasises the environmental value and vulnerability of particular areas, such as Scotland's Firths. Regulations which aim to reduce impacts of shipping activity are already in place and should continue to be enforced and monitored. Development plans have an important role to play in avoiding adverse effects on coasts. There is a need to ensure that potential strategic flood management issues to the west of Edinburgh are explored in more detail as development proposals progress through the planning system. |
Issue 6. | The NPF maintains an emphasis on derelict and vacant land reclamation, which should provide long-term benefits. The NPF balances this with a need to ensure development locations are accessible and sustainable, thereby supporting potential greenfield development, where it represents the best environmental option. The proposed port developments, 2014 Commonwealth Games Facilities and Infrastructure and Glasgow Strategic Drainage Scheme demonstrate how planning and environmental management can contribute positively to this environmental objective, whilst also achieving broader policy objectives. |
Mitigation | The SEA suggested that the NPF makes further reference to the role of vacant and derelict land in contributing to urban and peri-urban biodiversity networks. Partners involved in existing green network initiatives will also play an important role in achieving this. There is a continuing need for strategic and local development plans to help deliver the high level planning objective of prioritising brownfield land for development. |
Issue 7. | The NPF supports the principles of sustainable waste management, in line with wider sectoral policy. However, it does not identify the strategic infrastructure needed to achieve national waste targets. |
Mitigation | Scope to provide a clearer policy steer on sustainable waste management facilities continues to be explored, and it is hoped that this issue may be addressed more fully in the next draft of the NPF. Strategic and local development plans should complement area waste plans by making positive and sustainable provision for waste facilities and infrastructure. |
Issue 8. | The NPF aims to realise wider transport policy aims, including those set by the National Transport Strategy. It aims to progress the nationally significant Forth Replacement Crossing by identifying it as a national development. It also takes forward commitments to air transport, by safeguarding land for development and proposing enhancements to Edinburgh and Glasgow airports. Whilst these projects the connectivity agenda, they are likely to have secondary effects on some aspects of the environment, including soil, water, cultural heritage, landscape and biodiversity. Proposals for an enhanced and more sustainable freight network will also benefit the transport-related SEA objectives. The continuing emphasis on achieving a shift to more sustainable modes of transport and linking strategic development locations with accessibility will help to reduce the negative impacts of the transport sector. |
Mitigation | Most of the secondary effects of transport policies and proposals can only be fully identified and effectively mitigated through local planning and the project SEA and EIA processes. The need to achieve a shift to sustainable modes of transport has been reinforced in the Discussion Draft, and should also be reflected within development plans and consideration of strategic development locations. |
Issue 9. | The assessment suggests that the NPF will have positive, albeit largely indirect, effects on rural areas. The emphasis on city-led development and interurban connectivity could have mixed effects on rural areas, depending on currently levels of accessibility, proximity to markets and levels of rural service provision. However, no significant adverse effects on these areas are expected as a result of a clear recognition within the NPF of the need to maintain and where possible enhance environmental quality in rural landscapes and settlements. The aim of supporting economic diversification in small and medium sized towns should complement rural development objectives. Some of the national developments may also contribute to rural development, providing that their effects are appropriately mitigated at the project level. |
Mitigation | The drafting of the NPF has already sought to strengthen rural planning commitments by reflecting wider rural policies and programmes as far as possible. As with most other predicted effects, actual impacts will depend to a large extent on appropriate interpretation and delivery through strategic and local development plans. Priorities for mitigation focus on maintaining the quality of rural environments whilst supporting distinctiveness. |
Issue 10. | The NPF could have both positive and negative effects on cultural heritage, specifically the historic built environment. The overall strategy recognises the general value and contribution which heritage resources make to the quality of life and tourism. However, the NPF's emphasis on securing sustainable economic growth and infrastructure expansion and enhancement could also have more negative implications for some aspects of the historic environment. Some of the national developments may have local effects, although these cannot be fully determined at this stage, and require further consideration as their detailed design and siting are developed. Coastal and marine archaeology may be vulnerable to plans for improving the electricity transmission grid and offshore renewables, as remains are extensive but rarely subject to formal protective designations. |
Mitigation | The assessment suggests that the NPF could place more emphasis on the aspects of cultural heritage and the built environment which contribute to the distinctiveness of environments throughout the country. Potentially adverse effects of developments on cultural heritage should be identified and mitigated as far as possible through development plans and development management. |
Issue 11. | The assessment predicts mixed effects from the NPF on Scotland's landscapes. The development of the Discussion Draft has aimed to reflect, as far as possible, the special characteristics and capacity of landscapes in different parts of the country. However, the commitment to sustainable economic growth and emphasis on development in accessible locations (often on the edge of settlements) will have implications for some vulnerable landscapes which require to be positively managed through development plans, informed by an understanding of current capacity and future change. Some of the national developments could have implications for landscapes and seascapes. Reinforcement of the electricity transmission grid will need careful management to avoid significant cumulative landscape effects. The assessment also highlighted that landscape change arising from the NPF may be particularly significant in the area to the west of Edinburgh. |
Mitigation | Mitigation of adverse landscape effects will primarily be achieved through development plans, with strategic development plans having a particularly important role to play in addressing issues of capacity and landscape sensitivity. Project-level mitigation should aim to minimise adverse effects and achieve compensation through enhancement measures where effects are significant. Further mitigation measures in relation to offshore renewables and grid reinforcements have been identified in more detail in the SEAs for these policy topics. |
REASONS FOR SELECTING THE POLICY PROPOSALS INCLUDED IN THE DISCUSSION DRAFT NPF.
xxi. The Discussion Draft NPF is a 'preferred option', which remains open for further discussion. It has partly emerged from consideration of the options tested early in the SEA process. Consultation responses also played an important part in informing the policy development process. In many cases, the best possible environmental options have been adopted. In others, however, the content of the draft NPF was determined by wider programmes and existing policy commitments, and it has not been possible to take forward the most positive environmental option in every case. The accompanying paper on the policy alternatives explains how the preferred alternative was identified in more detail and provides more information on the environmental effects of the early, high level policy options.
MONITORING
xxii. The Environmental Report sets out a detailed framework for monitoring the environmental effects which have been identified during the course of the assessment. This focuses on the effects of the NPF on existing environmental problems as a means of prioritising future monitoring activities. Many of the issues will be reviewed as an integral part of the ongoing monitoring programme for the NPF itself. Others may require liaison with specialist environmental organisations and specific planning policy topic areas to ensure that any unforeseen or early environmental effects are recognised and acted upon.
NEXT STEPS
xxiii. The next steps for consulting on and finalising the NPF are as follows:
Milestone | Expected date |
|---|
Closing date for responses to the Discussion Draft NPF | 15 th April 2008 |
Revision of NPF on basis of consultation findings | April - May 2008 |
Publication of redrafted NPF for consideration by Parliament | Summer 2008 |
Parliamentary scrutiny of NPF | Summer 2008 |
Revision as a result of consideration by Parliament | Autumn 2008 |
Publication of finalised NPF | Winter 2008 |
Publication of Post-Adoption SEA Statement | Winter 2008 |
MAKING CONTACT
xxiv. If you require further information or would like to discuss any aspect of the NPFSEA, please contact the NPF Team using the details below:
- E-mail: NPFTeam@scotland.gsi.gov.uk; or
- Write to: National Planning Framework Team, The Scottish Government Planning Directorate, Victoria Quay, Leith, Edinburgh EH6 6QQ.
- Telephone: The Planning Helpline 08457 741741.