The Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals: Review of the Year 2006-2007

Listen

Last year's casework

Volume of cases

The Directorate processed 1,220 cases to decision in the course of the year, a slight increase on previous years. In addition, work was undertaken on a further 149 cases of which 97 were eventually withdrawn and 52 were temporarily suspended at the request of the parties as at 31 March 2006.

Table 1: Volume of cases

Business Year

In hand at start of year

Received*

Delegated appeals decided

Reports to the Scottish Ministers**

Withdrawn

In hand at end of year

2006-2007

527

1588

1160

60

97

798

2005/2006

499

1341

1130

80

98

532

2004/2005

481

1247

1024

86

115

503

2003/2004

427

1193

967

71

99

483

2002/2003

532

1117

1010

83

115

441

* Including appeal and non-appeal cases and 166 wayleave applications associated with the Beauly - Denny electricity transmission line.
* Including appeal and non-appeal cases.

Types of cases received

The Directorate saw an increase in the number of appeals received of more than 6% from last year. Within that, there was an increase in both planning permission and planning enforcement appeals. The large number of wayleave applications associated with the proposed Beauly-Denny electricity transmission line are the cause of the substantial increase in the "Other Non-Appeal" category.

Table 2: Types of cases received

Type of case

2005-2006

2006-2007

Planning permission appeals

1009

1065

Planning enforcement appeals

107

121

Conservation area consent, listed building consent, and listed building enforcement appeals

80

71

Advertisement consent, discontinuance notice, and advertisement enforcement appeals

79

89

All other types of appeal

6

17

Subtotal: all types of appeals

1281

1363

Planning call in, compulsory purchase, and other planning orders

31

35

Historic Scotland (listed building call in cases)

2

4

Trunk road proposals

5

5

Local plan inquiries

6

5

Other*

16

176

Subtotal: all types of non-appeal cases

60

225

ALL CASES RECEIVED

1341

1588

* Includes marine fish and shellfish farms; electricity and energy proposals; flood prevention schemes; nature conservation orders; Beauly-Denny wayleaves etc

The pie chart below illustrates the various types of case which have been dealt with during the year. Percentages shown are approximate and have been rounded up.

image of pie chart

Table 3a: Trend of planning permission appeals received during the last 5 years

The number of planning permission appeal cases continues to increase as demonstrated in the graph below. There were also some notable changes in the types of development involved. Householder developments increased from 285 to 364 but telecommunication appeals decreased from 100 to 67.

image of Table 3a: Trend of planning permission appeals received during the last 5 years

Table 3b: Breakdown of planning permission appeals

Type of development

Number of cases

Householder

364

Minerals

2

Telecommunications

67

Institutional

1

Demolition

2

Business and Industry: major

4

Business and Industry: minor

42

Hot food shops

28

Cafes/Restaurants

13

Retailing: major

12

Retailing: minor

17

Agricultural and Horse Management

3

Other: major

3

Other: minor

45

Waste Disposal

3

Dwellings: 10 or more

71

Dwellings: 2-9

97

Single Houses

207

Dwelling with multiple occupancy

22

Non-householder (alter and extend building)

18

Leisure and Recreation

13

Hotels and permanent visitor accommodation

11

Caravans and camp-sites

10

Energy Development: Wind Farm/Turbines

9

Energy Development: Other

1

All planning appeals received

1065

Method of determination and success rates

Table 4a shows the method of determination of cases and the success rates for different categories. Success in these tables is generally defined as a favourable outcome for the appellant or applicant, in that an appeal is allowed, an application is permitted, or an order is confirmed. The Directorate handled a slightly larger number of cases through to determination (1,201 up from 1,184). The overall success rate was 39% (the same as 2005-2006). Table 4b indicates the success rates for delegated appeals within individual planning authorities. Although the overall success rate was 38% in the last year, there is marked variation across the country.

Table 4a: Success rates by method of determination and type of case

**All cases

Considered by Public Local Inquiry and Hearing

Considered by Written Submissions

All cases

Total

Number allowed

% allowed

Total

Number allowed

% allowed

Number allowed

% allowed

Delegated Appeals

Planning permission

930

79

33

42%

812

336

41%

369

40%

Planning enforcement

88

6

1

17%

67

22

33%

23

26%

Conservation area consent, listed building consent, and listed building enforcement

65

2

2

100%

56

22

39%

24

37%

Advertisement consent, discontinuance notice, and advertisement enforcement

69

4

2

50%

58

17

29%

19

28%

All others

8

2

1

50%

5

3

60%

4

50%

Subtotal : all delegated appeals

1160

93

39

42%

998

400

40%

439

38%

Non-delegated appeals

Planning permission

18

9

4

44%

9

3

33%

7

39%

Total: all appeals

1178

102

43

42%

1007

403

40%

446

38%

Non appeal cases

Planning call-in, compulsory purchase, and other planning orders

15

9

8

89%

6

3

50%

11

73%

Historic Scotland (listed building call-in, scheduled monument consent and CPO cases)

1

0

0

0%

1

0

0%

0

0%

Traffic and transport (compulsory purchase, side road and other transport orders)

3

3

3

100%

0

0

0%

3

100%

Others *

4

3

2

67%

1

1

100%

3

75%

Total : all non-appeal cases

23

15

13

87%

8

4

50%

17

74%

TOTAL: ALL CASES

1201

117

56

48%

1015

407

40%

463

39%

* Includes marine fish and shellfish farms; electricity proposals; flood prevention schemes; nature conservation orders etc
** Includes administrative and no jurisdiction decisions.

Table 4b: Success rates for delegated appeals by Planning Authority

Planning Authority

Appeals Decided*

Appeals Allowed

Success Rate %

Aberdeen City

42

21

50%

Aberdeenshire

59

29

49%

Angus

26

6

23%

Argyll and Bute

31

7

23%

Cairngorms National Park

3

3

100%

Clackmannanshire

9

4

44%

Dumfries and Galloway

41

11

27%

Dundee, City of

25

14

56%

East Ayrshire

21

10

48%

East Dunbartonshire

18

10

56%

East Lothian

12

4

33%

East Renfrewshire

32

14

44%

Edinburgh, City

146

44

30%

Falkirk

16

4

25%

Fife

96

44

46%

Glasgow, City

105

40

38%

Highland

54

14

26%

Inverclyde

9

2

22%

Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park

15

8

53%

Midlothian

16

8

50%

Moray

37

12

32%

North Ayrshire

32

14

44%

North Lanarkshire

29

12

41%

Orkney Islands

2

1

50%

Perth and Kinross

65

26

40%

Renfrewshire

22

7

32%

Scottish Borders

42

14

33%

Shetland

2

0

0%

South Ayrshire

41

15

37%

South Lanarkshire

50

14

28%

Stirling

10

3

30%

West Dunbartonshire

13

5

38%

West Lothian

38

19

50%

Western Isles

1

0

0%

Total

1160

439

38%

* Includes administration and no jurisdiction decisions.

Major inquiries

In addition to many small-scale but individually important cases, the following were the subject of major or controversial planning appeal and call-in inquiries during the year:

  • Residential developments at Hopecroft and Kirkton of Skene, Aberdeen; Liberton Drive and Baberton Loan, Edinburgh; Charleston Harbour, Dunfermline; Muttonhall, Kirkcaldy; Netherbarns, Galashiels; and Argyle Street, Glasgow.
  • Windfarm developments at Calliachar, Perth; Griffin Forest, near Aberfeldy; Clashindarroch, near Huntly; Kyle, near Dalmellington; Harestanes, Dumfries and Galloway; Upper Clyde, South Lanarkshire; Toddleburn, Lauder; Auchterarder, Dunning and Glenfarg, Perthshire; and Crook of Devon, Kinross
  • Retail developments at South Harbour Road, Fraserburgh; Loop Road, Stonehaven; and Duchlage Road, Crieff.
  • Floodlit turf track at Musselburgh Racecourse; and sports complex at Deveron Terrace, Banff.
  • Pumping station at Lochgilphead, Argyll and new prison at Low Moss, Bishopbriggs.

In addition, an inquiry was held into the Port of Cairnryan Harbour Empowerment Order and three reporters began the inquiry into the Beauly to Denny overhead electricity transmission line.

Average cost per case

The slight increase in the cost per case this year can be accounted for by year on year inflation; a slight reduction in the number of cases processed; but an increase in the complexity of the public local inquiries we deal with as highlighted above. Although the number of public local inquiries and hearings is lower than last year, the cases dealt with took up a greater proportion of reporters' time. More sophisticated statistical analysis of case costs, for example of the costs of individual inquiries, is hampered by the nature of the information held on the Directorate's current Case Handling System. The introduction of a new Case Management System, which will provide more sophisticated analysis, is anticipated but delivery is delayed by factors outwith the Directorate's control.

Table 5: Cost of casework

Category

2005/06

2006/07

Written Submission appeals

1,019

1,015

Public Inquiries and Hearings

124

117

Withdrawn or sisted

151

149

Total Cases processed

1,294

1,281

Average Cost per Case

£1,575

£1,648

Local plans

A breakdown of local plan inquiries for 2006-07 together with the total workload is shown below. Although Table 2 indicates that 5 local plans were received in 2006-07, the inquiries into a further 4 commenced before 1 April 2005 and continued into this reporting period. For 2007-2008, the indications are that planning authorities again expect a very large proportion of the Directorate's resources to be available for commitment to a programme of local plan inquiries. These demands must be balanced against the workload arising from planning appeals, planning call-ins and the wide range of other essential casework detailed in Table 4a. We have been notified of 5 local plan inquiries that we expect to start in the year 2007/2008.

Table 6: Local Plan Inquiries

Planning Authority

Local Plan

Number of reporters

Total workload (days) in 2006/07

Aberdeen Council

Aberdeen City Local Plan

2

409

Angus Council

Angus Local Plan

2

117

East Lothian

East Lothian Local Plan

1

158

Fife Council

Cowdenbeath Local Plan (Mods)

1

4

North Lanarkshire Council

Southern Area Local Plan

1

5

Scottish Borders

Scottish Borders Local Plan

2

226

Stirling Council

Stirling Local Plan

1

33

Stirling Council

Stirling Local Plan (Mods)

1

4

West Lothian

West Lothian Local Plan

2

306

Total reporter workload

1,262 days

photo of administration

Claims for award of expenses

During this year 133 claims for awards of expenses were made, 3 less than in the previous year (136). The overall success rate was 25% compared to 28% last year. The objective tests for deciding whether the behaviour of any party has been unreasonable and thus has led to unnecessary expense remain those set out in SODD Circular 6/1990.

Table 7: Expenses claims

by the Planning Authority

Appellant

Third Party

Total

Against

10

0

10

Successful

2

0

2

by the Appellant

Planning Authority

Third Party

Total

Against

123

0

123

Successful

31

0

31

by Third Parties

Planning Authority

Appellant

Total

Against

0

0

0

Successful

0

0

0

Court of Session challenges

The number of Court of Session challenges this year was slightly higher than in previous years. We have continued to meet the target that no more than 1% of all delegated appeals, as determined by reporters, should be the subject either of successful Court challenge or undefended if challenged.

Table 8: Court of Session Challenges

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

Number of challenges

Delegated decisions challenged

9

11

5

12

13

Withdrawn or abandoned

2

4

0

0

1

Won by challenger or not defended

2

4

2

5

2

Reporter's decisions upheld

5

3

3

3

1

Remaining before the Court

0

0

0

4

9

Page updated: Friday, August 10, 2007