Register to receive email news alerts, daily digest, weekly roundup or Topic newsletters.
Listen
Dominic Moran, Clare Hall, Alistair McVittie, Scottish Agricultural College ISSN 0950 2254 ISBN 978 0 7559 6559 5 (Web only publication) This document is also available in pdf format Main document (960k) Appendices (806k)
Acknowledgements
Executive Summary
Chapter one: Introduction 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Policy background 1.3 Defining co-location 1.4 Cost Benefit Analysis 1.5 The benefits of service provision 1.6 Approaches to Measuring benefits 1.7 Measuring costs 1.8 Project approach and report structure
Chapter two: Literature review of key rural services and co-location 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Service prioritisation 2.3 Services suitable for co-location based on service function 2.4 Services commonly co-located 2.5 Co-location examples 2.6 Conclusions
Chapter three: Stakeholder consultation workshop 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Methods 3.3 Exercise on service prioritisation 3.4 Hypothetical models of co-location 3.5 Recommended case studies 3.6 Conclusions
Chapter four: Qualitative research on service provision in case study areas 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Methods 4.3 Case study one - Stornoway 4.4 Case study two - Eastriggs 4.5 Case study three - Applecross 4.6 Conclusions
Chapter five: Quantitative survey - Attitudes to services 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Methods 5.3 Attitudes towards rural service provision
Chapter six: Quantitative survey - Choice experiment 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Methods 6.3 Results 6.4 Relative preference orderings 6.5 Discussion of preference orderings 6.7 Conclusions
Chapter seven: Costs of service provision 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Costs 7.3 Cost of service delivery 7.4 Consideration of costs from stakeholder workshop in Perth 7.5 Case study area cost information 7.6 Conclusion
Chapter eight: Comparison of costs and benefits of service delivery options 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Methods 8.3 Non-market benefit scenarios 8.4 Cost benefit analysis of service provision scenarios 8.5 Conclusions
Chapter nine: Conclusions
References
APPENDIX 1: CASE STUDY SELECTIONAPPENDIX 2: TOPIC GUIDE FOR CASE STUDY WORKSHOPSAPPENDIX 3: STATEMENT FROM SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE DISTRIBUTED AT WORKSHOPSAPPENDIX 4: STORNOWAY WORKSHOPSAPPENDIX 5: EASTRIGGS WORKSHOPSAPPENDIX 6: APPLECROSS WORKSHOPSAPPENDIX 7: INITIAL THOUGHTS ON THE CHOICE SETSAPPENDIX 8: COST PROFORMAAPPENDIX 9: SAMPLE SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
List of Tables Table 1: Service benefit categorisation Table 2: The information, expert, social and physical functions of services Table 3: Service prioritisation Table 4: Selected case studies Table 5: Suggested services for co-location. Table 6: Choice experiment attributes and levels Table 7: Choice experiment results for the three areas. Table 8: Implicit prices (£/household/annum). Table 9: Welfare losses of increasing distances to access services Table 10: Annual costs for co-located services. Table 11: Annual service provision costs for council services outlet co-located in Eastriggs Post Office (2005 £). Table 12: Cost benefit analysis of Eastriggs council service outlet cost and service scenarios. Table 13: Cost benefit analysis of Applecross library service scenarios. Table 14: Cost benefit analysis of Stornoway Voluntary Resource Centre service scenarios.
List of figures Figure 1: Stages of the methodology Figure 2: Group one service prioritisation Figure 3: Group two service prioritisation Figure 4: Group one co-location model Figure 5 : Group two co-location model Figure 6: The completed mapping exercise at the afternoon workshop in Stornoway Figure 7: Locations of sample areas and respondents. Figure 8: Summary of attitudinal responses amongst Eastriggs respondents. Figure 9: Summary of attitudinal responses amongst Applecross respondents. Figure 10: Summary of attitudinal responses amongst Lewis respondents. Figure 11: Usage frequencies for different services. Figure 12: Service users' perceptions of quality. Figure 13: Service users' distances from service. Figure 14: Suitability of services for co-location. Figure 15: Example choice set Figure 16: Comparison of estimated coefficients. Figure 17: Implicit prices.
Page updated: Wednesday, March 28, 2007