" HMIC is encouraged by the overall trend in road safety in Scotland, however the target figures have largely been achieved in urban areas and work is still necessary to address the significant problems associated with road accidents in more rural areas"
Appendix A:
HMIC Corporate Plan 2006-2009
Introduction
This document provides information on strategic planning and development within Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary ( HMIC). The plan takes account of the public need for continuously improving services as well as the demands faced by the police service in Scotland with regard to local, national and international issues. It recognises the key role of the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland ( ACPOS), individual forces and common police services, soon to be the Scottish Police Services Authority, in driving forward change in the police service in Scotland.
The document also contains an annual business plan which provides information about the work of the Inspectorate planned for the financial year 2006-07. It sets out the methodology and the organisational framework by which HMIC will encourage continuous improvement and Best Value in the service offered to the public by Scottish police forces and other Scottish police organisations in an ever-changing environment.
The business plan contains a risk register updated on an annual basis which outlines the perceived threats to the organisation and strategies and actions taken to address these.
Period of the Plan
The corporate plan is a three year rolling plan and incorporates the annual business plan and risk register. All three aspects of this plan will be reviewed and updated annually.
Statement of Purpose and Principles
The primary function of HMIC is to promote efficiency and effectiveness within the police service in Scotland
Purpose
HMIC is a statutory body whose primary function is to promote efficiency and effectiveness in the forces and organisations that make up the police service in Scotland. HMIC also has other inspectorial responsibilities shared with HMIC England and Wales and joint inspectorial responsibilities with Audit Scotland. Other functions include the provision of advice to Scottish Ministers and the examination of the manner in which forces deal with complaints against the police. Whilst the latter will change with the introduction of the Scottish Police Complaints Commissioner in April 2007, HMIC will retain an interest in the conduct and management of complaints against the police.
The purpose of HMIC can be summarised as follows:
- to promote efficiency and effectiveness within the Scottish Police Service;
- to provide independent and impartial advice to Scottish Ministers;
- to report annually to Scottish Ministers on the state and efficiency of police forces in Scotland.
Operating Principles
HMIC operates within the following guiding principles:
- independence - to ensure impartial examination of evidence HMIC carries out its Inspection work independently of the police service and Scottish Ministers;
- openness and communication - to ensure all stakeholders have the opportunity to provide input to the inspection process;
- lay involvement - the appointment of Her Majesty's Lay Inspector of Constabulary reinforces the principles of independence and openness;
- continuous improvement/internal inspection - in the process of inspecting policing organisations in Scotland HMIC seeks to identify and spread good practice while promoting improvement. HMIC regularly examines its own business and inspection arrangements to ensure they remain fit for purpose;
- equal opportunities and diversity - to ensure all aspects of policing and the work of HMIC promote equality of opportunity, the elimination of discrimination and good relations with all sections of communities.
Structure
HMIC operates with a small staff led by Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary,
Her Majesty's Lay Inspector of Constabulary and an Assistant Inspector. The inspection work is led by these officers and is conducted by a team of staff officers who are assisted by support staff.
Inspection Process
The inspection of police forces and common police services in Scotland is the core business of HMIC. It facilitates continuous improvement and the sharing of good practice. HMIC uses the EFQM Excellence model as a practical tool in the inspection process. Forces and other police organisations are encouraged to use the principles of self evaluation in preparing for inspection. The model is reproduced in Fig 1 and the following paragraphs summarise the current methodology used in HMIC's inspectorial role.
Primary Inspections
HMIC conducts a rolling programme of regular inspection of forces and common police services. Primary inspections are conducted every five years. The full programme is available and is updated regularly and available on the HMIC website www.scotland.gov.uk/hmic . The programme typically includes two but no more than three primary inspections within Scotland each year. Using the EFQM model, forces are asked to provide initial responses to a set of detailed questions devised to assess the force's position in the changing policing environment. The information provided by the force gives its perspective of the policing environment and identifies key drivers, demands and policing needs in that particular force area. This information is used to inform the fieldwork part of the inspection process which allows for more detailed examination of key areas of interest.

HMIC can then:
- examine the efforts of the force to address these drivers, demands and needs;
- assess the outputs and outcomes;
- comment on the policing performance of the force.
Review Inspections
Review inspections are conducted twice at 18 month intervals after the Primary Inspection and focus on the progress made on areas identified for attention or improvement in the primary inspection. The opportunity is also taken to examine new issues selected through an interim assessment of force performance, the findings of thematic inspections and issues of local or national concern about policing.
Thematic Inspections
HMIC also conducts thematic inspections on matters of significant importance to policing in Scotland. The topics represent key current matters of public interest and are identified through consultation with ACPOS, individual chief constables, the Scottish Executive and joint police boards/police authorities.
Copies of all primary, review and thematic inspections are available on the HMIC website at www.scotland.gov.uk/hmic
Project and Knowledge Management
HMIC uses project management techniques to manage the inspection, review inspection and thematic inspection process. It also maintains a knowledge management unit to provide statistical analysis of data and environmental scanning. The knowledge collated by this unit is used to inform the inspection process and the Annual Report prepared by HMCIC.
Annual Report
Each year HMCIC produces an Annual Report on the state and efficiency of police forces in Scotland. That report will provide a commentary on how policing in Scotland was delivered to the people of Scotland, setting out the policing environment and police performance across the country. This document is available on the HMIC website at www.scotland.gov.uk/hmic
Advice to Ministers
The Inspectorate also has a responsibility to provide advice to Scottish ministers. This is achieved through regular contact with officials in the Justice Department and also through direct discussions between HMIC and Ministers.
Complaints Against the Police
A current responsibility of HMIC is to receive complaints from members of the public who are dissatisfied with the way in which complaints they have made to police forces have been managed. HMIC conducts an examination of the manner in which the complaint has been handled by the force concerned, but does not re-investigate the issues. HMIC may in appropriate circumstances direct the force to reinvestigate.
HMIC's examination is undertaken with the involvement of Her Majesty's Lay Inspector of Constabulary who, as a non police member of the organisation, is able to provide an independent assessment of the evidence. In April 2007, this role will migrate to the Scottish Police Complaints Commissioner, however HMIC will continue, as part its inspectorial function, to maintain an interest in the management and resolution of complaints against the police in Scotland.
Services for Children Unit at HMIe
Another key area of work is HMIC's involvement with the Services for Children Unit at HMIe. The unit has been established to develop and implement a framework for the inspection of children's services, beginning with child protection inspection. HMIC has continued to support the development of this important piece of work by supplying two officers on secondment to the Services for Children Unit.
Whilst the lead role is taken by Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education ( HMIe), HMCIC sits on a joint steering group along with heads of the Scottish Commission for the Regulation of Care (Care Commission) the Social Work Inspection Agency ( SWIA), NHS Quality Improvement Scotland ( NHSQIS) and Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education ( HMIe).
Business Planning and Risk Management
The strategic leadership provided by HMCIC, assisted by the Assistant Inspector of Constabulary, develops and facilitates the mission and vision of HMIC. In this structure HMCIC devises the organisational values and systems required for sustainable success and provides the leadership to ensure that HMIC remains 'fit for purpose'.
The HMIC programme of inspections is reproduced regularly and updated to take account of emerging issues. This is the core and significant majority of HMIC's business. However, HMIC is aware of the need to adopt the same continuous improvement philosophy as that being applied to the police service in Scotland and during 2006 an EFQM assessment of HMIC's business will be conducted. The outcome of that assessment will be used to amend the annual business plans for subsequent years. During 2005 a risk register was developed and this is now updated and linked to the corporate and business plans to ensure co-ordination of all routine and developmental activity within the Inspectorate.
The risk register lists details of the key corporate and operational risks facing HMIC. An assessment has been made of their likelihood and the potential impact on HMIC of their occurrence. It also identifies existing control factors which already mitigate against the risk occurring and any additional actions and/or milestones that may be relevant in managing individual risks.
Fundamental to accurate risk assessment is the use of environmental scanning to identify political, economic, social, technical, legislative and environmental issues facing the service.
Key enablers in this process are ACPOS Business Areas, the Scottish Executive and other partners along with the staff officers and support staff of HMIC.
Business Plan 2006-07
Emerging Issues
In addition to the work detailed in the Inspection Programme 2006 -10, the following new and developing issues are included in HMIC's business plan for 2006-07.
The Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice Bill proposes the creation of the Scottish Police Services Authority, the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency and a new Scottish Police Complaints Commissioner for Scotland. As the management and leadership arrangement for these new structures becomes more clearly defined HMIC will consider any implications for the process of inspecting these bodies and will make any necessary adjustments to the inspection programme and methodology.
HMIC will have inspectorial responsibilities in respect of the Authority and the Agency. However its existing role in respect of the examination of the manner in which forces deal with complaints against the police will migrate to the new Scottish Police Complaints Commissioner. It will be vital to ensure that a high level of service is maintained for members of the public who wish to pursue complaints against the police. HMIC will work closely with the Scottish Executive with regard to transition arrangements. However HMIC will also continue to have a legitimate interest in how forces manage complaints against the police and how they manage conduct issues in respect of officers belonging to a force, authority or agency.
Following publication in 2006 of a thematic inspection report 'Managing Improvement' on performance management in the police service in Scotland, both ACPOS and the Scottish Executive have responded to the recommendations which the report contained. As one of the key stakeholders in policing performance, HMIC will continue to exert influence and monitor progress in this area over 2006-07, both at the highest level in the multi-agency Scottish Strategic Steering Group and in the partnership groups chaired by ACPOS which aim to introduce a common policing environment and police performance framework and reporting system across Scotland.
Resources
HMIC anticipates that the programme of inspection, review inspection and thematic inspection can be achieved within existing staffing arrangements, including career development secondments within the current budget range.
Conclusion
HMIC seeks to continue its contribution to the development of the police service in Scotland. Through the measures and processes detailed in this plan it will continue to assist in clarifying the policing environment and quantifying police performance for the benefit of the public, partners in the criminal justice and local authority environments and the Scottish Executive.
HMIC Organisational Chart

Inspection Programme 2005-2010
Year | Force/ Service | Type | Notification of Protocols | In-Force Inspection/ Review Period | Report Publication |
|---|
2005/06 | Thematic - Joint Scrutiny of Children's Services/Learning Disabilities | Thematic | August 2004 | | - |
|---|
Tayside Police (2nd Review) | Review | October 2005 | December 2005 | May 2006 |
Fife Constabulary | Primary | August 2005 | November 2005 | 18 May 2006 |
2006/07 | SDEA (2nd Review) | Review | February 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 |
|---|
Strathclyde Police (18 month review) | Review | January 2006 | April 2006 | June 2006 |
Thematic - Case Management | Thematic | August 2005 | October 2005 | June 2006 |
Grampian Police | Primary | February 2006 | May 2006 | September 2006 |
Thematic: Intelligence and Information Sharing | Thematic | March 2006 | April 2006 | November 2006 |
Scottish Police College | Primary | August 2006 | September 2006 | December 2006 |
SCRO (18 month review) | Review | August 2006 | October 2006 | December 2006 |
Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary | Primary | August 2006 | November 2006 | March 2007 |
2007/08 | Lothian and Borders Police (2nd review) | Review | December 2006 | February 2007 | April 2007 |
|---|
HMIC Review of Performance Management Recommendations | Review | February 2007 | April 2007 | - |
Northern Constabulary (18 month review) | Review | February 2007 | April 2007 | June 2007 |
Thematic (subject to be determined) | Thematic | February 2007 | March 2007 | June 2007 |
HMIC Review of SCRS Recommendations | Review | April 2007 | June 2007 | - |
Central Scotland Police (2nd review) | Review | April 2007 | June 2007 | August 2007 |
Tayside Police | Primary | February 2007 | May 2007 | September 2007 |
Fife Constabulary (18 month review) | Review | May 2007 | August 2007 | October 2007 |
HMIC Review of Case Management Recommendations | Review | June 2007 | August 2007 | - |
SPIS | Primary | August 2007 | September 2007 | December 2007 |
Strathclyde Police (2nd Review) | Review | August 2007 | October 2007 | December 2007 |
S(C) DEA | Primary | August 2007 | November 2007 | March 2008 |
Grampian Police (18 month review) | Review | October 2007 | December 2007 | February 2008 |
2008/09 | SCRO (2nd Review) | Review | January 2008 | March 2008 | May 2008 |
|---|
Thematic (subject to be determined) | Thematic | February 2008 | March 2008 | June 2008 |
Scottish Police College (18 month review) | Review | March 2008 | May 2008 | July 2008 |
Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary (18 month review) | Review | April 2008 | June 2008 | August 2008 |
Lothian and Borders Police | Primary | February 2008 | May 2008 | September 2008 |
Thematic (subject to be determined) | Thematic | August 2008 | September 2008 | December 2008 |
Northern Constabulary (2nd Review) | Review | August 2008 | October 2008 | December 2008 |
Tayside Police (18 month Review) | Review | September 2008 | November 2008 | January 2009 |
Central Scotland Police | Primary | August 2008 | November 2008 | March 2009 |
Fife Constabulary (2nd Review) | Review | December 2008 | February 2009 | April 2009 |
SPIS (18 month Review) | Review | January 2009 | March 2009 | May 2009 |
2009/10 | Thematic (subject to be determined) | Thematic | February 2009 | March 2009 | June 2009 |
|---|
Strathclyde Police | Primary | February 2009 | May 2009 | September 2009 |
SDEA (18 month review) | Review | April 2009 | June 2009 | August 2009 |
Grampian Police (2nd review) | Review | June 2009 | August 2009 | October 2009 |
Thematic (subject to be determined) | Thematic | August 2009 | September 2009 | December 2009 |
SCRO | Primary | August 2009 | November 2009 | March 2010 |
Lothian and Borders Police (18 month review) | Review | September 2009 | November 2009 | January 2010 |
Scottish Police College (2nd Review) | Review | October 2009 | January 2010 | March 2010 |
Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary (2nd review) | Review | November 2009 | January 2010 | March 2010 |
PNC Inspection Timetable 2003/2009
| Force | Inspection | Audit Date |
|---|
2006/07 | Dumfries & Galloway | PNC Audit | April 2006 |
|---|
Tayside Police | PNC Audit | June 2006 |
Lothian and Borders Police | PNC Audit | December 2006 |
2007/08 | Central Scotland Police | PNC Audit | April 2007 |
|---|
Strathclyde Police | PNC Audit | August 2007 |
Grampian Police | PNC Audit | October 2007 |
2008/09 | Northern Constabulary | PNC Audit | August 2008 |
|---|
Fife Constabulary | PNC Audit | December 2008 |
1 Should there be the need to adapt the cycle to respond to events, management change or performance, the programme may be altered.
2 HMIC's involvement in the scrutiny of British Transport Police, Ministry of Defence Police and UKAEA Police are not shown in the programme at this time.
3 The In-Force Inspection/Review Period is provided as a guide as to likely HMIC presence within force/organisation as appropriate to the type of inspection.
4 The subject of thematic inspections in later years will be identified from issues arising from inspections and events and will be consistent with the concept of a progressive service development approach.
5 The PNC Inspections are undertaken by the Police National Computer ( PNC) Compliance Audit Section of HMIC for England and Wales. The above timetable has been designed to allow all eight Scottish Police forces be audited under the new PNC Inspection Regime every three years and as close to an HMIC Scotland Inspection as possible.
HMIC Business Plan 2006-2007
GOAL 1: TO ENQUIRE AND REPORT ON THE STATE AND EFFICIENCY OF POLICING IN SCOTLAND |
Objectives | Targets | Responsibility | Risks * | Comment |
|---|
1.1 To develop and conduct a programme of planned inspections (regular and thematic) | As detailed in the Inspection programme | AIC | 1/4 | Review in August 2006-2010 |
1.2 Ensure HMIC protocols and processes address statutory requirements and emerging issues | Review the inspection protocols in accordance with emerging legislative and procedural changes. Changes to protocols to be recorded. Implement a 'Running Diary' document after each primary Inspection | Team Leader/ Staff Officers/ KMU | 2/3 | Review in August |
1.3 To publish report on Policing in Scotland | Produce an Annual Report by November 2006 | HMCIC/ KMU | 4 | Review in November |
GOAL 2: TO PROMOTE AND ENHANCE POLICE EFFECTIVENESS, EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMY |
Objectives | Targets | Responsibility | Risk | Comment |
|---|
2.1 To continue development of a joint approach by HMIC and partners in the inspection process | a. To report on work with Audit Scotland and Local Government Finance in the audit/inspection of forces in accordance with the joint arrangements for Best Value audits. (as required) b. To report on work with the Commission for Racial Equality ( CRE) in the inspection of Race Equality Schemes. (as required) c. To explore further opportunities for partnership/ joint working in inspections as the opportunities arise. (ongoing) | AIC | 5 | Review in June |
2.2 To further develop a research and environmental scanning strategy to provide efficient and effective information management to support the work of HMIC and its partners | KMU to produce all scanning reports for inspections one week prior to the pre-inspection meeting Commission, manage and produce research projects for inspections within the timescales agreed within the project initiation document. All relevant environmental scanning results to be added to the database within five days of receipt Respond to all ad hoc requests for information within three days | KMU | 2/8/11 | Review in August |
GOAL 3: TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL ADVICE ON POLICING MATTERS |
Objectives | Targets | Responsibility | Risks | Comment |
|---|
3.1 To provide timely, relevant and impartial advice to Ministers, Police Boards, Chief Constables and other stakeholders when appropriate | a. To meet with Chief Constables, Deputy Chief Constables, Assistant Chief Constables and other members of force executive b. Attend Police Board meetings during primary inspections and review inspections as appropriate c. All requests for advice to Ministers/ SE/other stakeholders to be provided within five days | HMCIC All Staff | 9/10 | Review in April 2007 |
GOAL 4: TO MONITOR AND REVIEW COMPLAINTS AGAINST POLICE BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC |
Objectives | Targets | Responsibility | Risk | Comment |
|---|
4.1 To sustain an appropriate methodology to ensure the quality and consistency of the work of HMIC | a. Monitor performance on dealing with complainers (quarterly) b. Ensure that 100% of complaints dealt with by HMIC are completed within scheduled timescales | a. AIC b. AIC/Complaints Staff Officer Overview: Lay Inspector | 7 | Review in August |
4.2 To prepare a migration plan to prepare for the transfer of the Complaints portfolio to the proposed Scottish Complaints Commissioner | a. Work with the Justice Department to plan for a smooth transfer (completion by April 2007) | AIC/Complaints Staff Officer Overview Lay Inspector | 7 | Review in August |
GOAL 5: TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE WORKING RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN HMIC ENVIRONMENT |
Objectives | Targets | Responsibility | Risk | Comment |
|---|
5.1 To promote effective internal/ external working practices within HMIC | a. Provide quarterly update reports on HMIC Business Plan b. Conduct monthly HMIC staff meetings c. All reports to be available on website on day of publication, e-mail hyperlink to all stakeholders notifying of additions to website on day of publication d. Meet with HMIC force liaison officers on an annual basis e. Maintain liaison with HMIC E & W, at least twice annually | a. KMU b. HMCIC/Office Manager | 4 | Review in September |
GOAL 6: TO ENSURE HMIC RESOURCES ARE USED IN AN EFFICIENT MANNER AND THAT STAFF ARE MANAGED, DEVELOPED AND VALUED |
Objectives | Targets | Responsibility | Risk | Comment |
|---|
6.1 To encourage High Professional Standards | a. Selection / interview process to be robust and fit for purpose - ongoing b. Training and development plans to be completed for every staff member - ongoing | | 6 | Review in September |
6.2 To conduct staff appraisals for all HMIC staff | a. 100% of SE staff reports to be returned to Personnel by 31 May 2005 b. 100% of seconded police officer reports to be completed annually on secondment anniversary date using officer's force appraisal system | HMCIC | | |
6.3 To provide induction training for all new staff | a. New staff to receive induction packs one week before start b. New staff to receive timely induction and system to be monitored c. Ongoing review and update of induction pack | a. Office Manager b. OM/ Complaints SO c. Office Manager | | |
GOAL 7: TO PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE |
Objectives | Targets | Responsibility | Risk | Comment |
|---|
7.1 To provide timely distribution of inspection reports | a. Distribute inspection reports within the Inspection Process timescales b. Maintain an up to date address database | Support Staff | 4 | Review in August |
7.2 To provide travel and accommodation services | a. Timely issue of tickets and hotel bookings b. Update preferred hotel list on a regular basis | Support Staff | | |
7.3 To maintain HMIC library | a. Maintain the database on documentation stored in HMIC library | a. Admin Support b. Support Staff | | |
7.4 To ensure HMIC has adequate resources for core business budget | a. Monitor expenditure on a monthly basis b. Provide monthly reports on expenditure for HMCIC and PS/ JD c. Stationery orders to be placed monthly | Office Manager | 2 | Review in August |
HMIC Risk Management Policy and Risk Register 2006-07
Amended May 2006
Risk | Likelihood/ Impact | Background and Evidence | Control Mechanisms | Controls Adequate Y/N | Further Action/ Milestones |
|---|
1. Failure to identify critical issues during inspections | L/H | Identifying critical issues is central to the credibility of HMIC. The Bichard Inquiry involves an example of a critical inspection issue apparently being missed | - Clear mandate, terms of reference and identification of risks in PIDs
- KMU providing awareness of relevant information
- Environmental Scanning
- Five year cycle of inspections
- Option Appraisals
- Peer scrutiny
- Accuracy check
| Y | Reported by AIC in December 2005 Review of Inspection arrangements by AIC and Chief Supt Update with HMIC England and Wales Review in August |
2. Inadequate planning and resourcing Inspection activity | L/H | HMIC operates to a limited budget and depends upon good relationship and cooperation it has with ACPOS to carry out the current range and depth of inspection activity. It is a demanding schedule of activity subject to requests to engage in additional work. Good planning is necessary to ensure inspection activity is managed well and HMIC commitment is successfully achieved. Capacity of ACPOS to assist was severely tested during G8. | - Linking priorities with resources
- Forward programme of inspections
- Control over work plan
- Good relationship with ACPOS
- Managing increased demands from Ministers and others
- Marketing benefits
- Clarification of terms reference
- Managing channels of communication
- Agree programme
- Forward planning
| Y | Reported by AIC in December 2005 Review of project management arrangements in 2006 Review in August |
3. Lack of co-ordination and consistency of HMIC/scrutiny bodies/ SE activities | M/H | Accuracy is central to HMIC's credibility and this could be seriously affected by inconsistency of information and data published. Confusion relating to crime statistics caused by different reporting agencies is an example of risk in this area | - Memoranda of understanding
- Clear understanding of roles
- Management of key relationships
- Crime stats being progressed through strategic steering group
- Adequate liaison with partner bodies
| N | Report in June with refinement of details associated with risk and further options for reducing likelihood/ impact. Review September 2006 |
4. Quality and consistency of reports not maintained | L/H | Impact, clarity, use of language and accuracy all influence the perceived value of HMIC reports | - Application of standard processes/protocol
- Co-authorship
- Internal peer review and Supervisory checks
- Cleared in draft with force
- Suitably skilled authors
| Y | Review in September 2006 |
5. Challenges to the value of inspection | L/H | Current influences might generate challenge to the value of inspection. This could be damaging to HMIC credibility and, therefore, its effectiveness | - Quality control of reports
- Continuous improvement and review
- Marketing of benefits of HMIC
| N | Report in June with refinement of details associated with risk and further options for reducing likelihood/impact |
6. High professional standards not maintained | L/H | Individually, members of staff must meet high professional standards. Inappropriate conduct can be very damaging to reputation of HMIC | - Code of conduct
- Selection and induction
- Already subject to rigorous police checks
- Robust selection processes
- Training and development
| Y | Review in September |
7. Failure to meet HMIC's responsibilities in dealing with complaints | L/H | While SE has pledged to introduce an independent element to oversight of police complaints, HMIC meantime retains its statutory authority. The credibility and effectiveness of HMIC depends on its ability to exercise its authority in an impartial manner and by applying a qualitative assessment | - Procedures in place
- Existing processes
- Peer review
- Lay inspector involvement
| Y | Review in August to ensure appropriate handover arrangements are in place to transfer responsibility to the Scottish Complaints Commissioner in April 2007 |
8. Quality and effectiveness of inspection model | L/H | With increased interest in scrutiny processes it is important that HMIC's inspection model continues to be effective in comparison with alternative models | - Model kept under review
- Proven track record
- Benchmarking of models
| Y | Report in July with refinement of details associated with risk and further options for reducing likelihood/ impact |
9. Independence compromised by investigatory role | L/M | While HMIC recognises the potential value of HMIC involvement in investigation, it also recognises the potential it creates for subsequent inspection activity | - Learn from past experiences
- Clear terms of reference
- Additional investigatory work should be funded in addition to HMIC's
- core budget
| Y | Report in June with refinement of details associated with risk and further options for reducing likelihood/impact |
10. Potential for conflict between inspection, policy development and operational delivery | L/L | HMIC recognises that it can contribute to experience through observation but must balance the interest in involving HMIC in policy development with the potential this has to compromise its inspection role | - Relationship meetings
- Clear understanding of role
- Police Scotland Act
- Build into inspection reports and business plan
| Y | Review in April 2007. |
11. Inadequacy of ICT Support | L/L | HMIC is committed to providing efficient ICT support for its work | - Robust SE systems and back up
- Up-to-date technology and supplies
| Y | Review in April 2007 |