Implementing the Water Environment and Water Services (Scotland) Act 2003: Consultation on proposals for environmental standards and conditions – phase 1

Listen

3. How SEPA will use the proposed standards

As outlined in section A, SEPA will use its regulatory powers to manage environmental capacity in a way that protects and, where necessary, improves the water environment, whilst ensuring that sustainable uses of these waters can continue and flourish.

Assessing current conditions against the environmental standards - for water quality, water resources, morphology and pollutants (when introduced) - will determine the available capacity of each water body to accommodate further activities or developments without harming biology.

Where there is significant remaining capacity, this means that, for instance, part of a river could accommodate some changes, such as reduced water flow or alterations to the banks, without compromising the status of its ecosystem. However, where there is very little or no available capacity, one or more standards are close to failure, or have been failed. The existing pressures on that water body therefore between them pose a risk of it not achieving 'good' ecological status.

The environmental standards set out in Annex A are intended to help define this capacity of surface water bodies to accommodate alterations to their characteristics, without those alterations posing a significant risk to the status of the plants and animals they support.

Taking action to improve the status of the water environment

We expect SEPA to consider requiring action to improve the status of the water environment where it is confident that, without such action, there is a significant risk of failing to achieve the relevant environmental objectives.

SEPA will have the necessary confidence that there is a significant risk where:

  • monitoring or modelling data provide a high level of confidence that an environmental standard identified as needed to support the achievement of 'good' status or another relevant objective is being failed; or
  • biological monitoring results provide a high level of confidence that the ecological quality of the water body is currently worse than that required to achieve 'good' status or another relevant objective; or
  • the weight of evidence overall, including, where relevant, evidence such as compliance records and histories of incidents, provides a high level of confidence that there is a significant risk that 'good' status or another relevant objective will not be achieved unless appropriate improvement action is taken.

Where SEPA does not have high confidence, it may nevertheless consider and support low cost actions that all parties are willing to take where such actions will increase the likelihood that 'good' status, or other relevant objectives, will be achieved.

In so far as it is practicable and relevant, SEPA will also ensure that the improvements it requires of operators of controlled activities:

  • are sufficient to prevent deterioration of status being caused in the future by any fluctuations in environmental quality that cannot readily be controlled;
  • provide capacity for future development where development is currently constrained because of the lack of environmental capacity; and
  • stop or reverse trends resulting from the cumulative impacts of controlled activities before capacity is exceeded.

Where a water body is found to be at risk, SEPA will consider what practical measures could be taken to address that risk. In many cases, it may be possible to adopt relatively low cost measures to reduce the impact of an activity. In other cases, more significant actions may be needed to address the risk. An example of how SEPA will apply the proposed standards follows this section.

SEPA will not seek improvements to the status of water bodies that would be technically infeasible or disproportionately expensive.

Actions to improve the status of the water environment are more likely to be proportionate when one or more of the following circumstances apply:

  • an environmental standard is clearly failed over a wide area;
  • the actions required to make the improvements have low cost or comprise established good practice measures;
  • there is evidence of significant biological impacts; or
  • the improvements will contribute to achieving a number of environmental, social or economic objectives.

Taking action to protect the water environment

We expect SEPA to use its powers to prevent controlled activities from causing a failure of an environmental standard. Exceptions to this may be allowed in specific circumstances provided for in the Directive, as outlined in our paper on objective-setting.

Unless these specific circumstances are met, SEPA will refuse authorisations for applications to undertake controlled activities that are likely to cause a failure of an environmental standard.

SEPA will normally be expected to grant authorisation for activities that do not cause an environmental standard to be failed, provided that granting such authorisations would not:

  • cause fluctuations in environmental quality that are difficult to control, and so risk subsequent deteriorations in status;
  • compromise the achievement of other environmental objectives, including those for Protected Areas (such as Natura 2000 sites or areas identified to protect drinking water sources);
  • unnecessarily constrain future development through inefficient use of environmental capacity; or
  • have significant adverse effects on the interests of other users of the water environment.

In granting authorisations, SEPA will impose the conditions it considers necessary to ensure new activities do not cause a failure of an environmental standard, though exceptions may be made in specific circumstances, as explained above. These steps are important to avoid risking deterioration of status of any water body, or jeopardising the future achievement of the environmental objectives for any water body. SEPA will take any necessary and appropriate action to encourage and enforce compliance with authorisation conditions, in order to prevent environmental standards being failed. SEPA will also use its powers to prevent unauthorised activities from causing environmental standards to be failed.

SEPA will develop rules for applying the standards to water bodies. This will require SEPA to define the appropriate scale over which a standard would have to be failed in a water body for the failure to affect the status of the water body.

Example: application of standards for river flows

River ecology can be particularly vulnerable during periods of low river flows. Low flows occur naturally during periods of low rainfall and flows can be very low during summer droughts. The proposed standards set out the degree to which river flow can be reduced further during low flow periods without significantly increasing the risk to aquatic plants and animals. The standards can therefore be used to determine the volume of water that could be abstracted at these times without risking harm to the ecology.

As with all the proposed standards, SEPA will follow these steps:

1. Identify which water bodies are at risk of failing the standards. New information on abstraction volumes from the CAR regime will refine the estimates in the 'Article 5' characterisation reports.

2. Identify which activities are contributing to the risk in each water body.

3. Initiate reviews of the authorisations for the relevant activities. If the operator considers that the necessary improvements would be disproportionately expensive:

  • Advertise the review to enable third parties to express their views to SEPA on the implications of improving the flows in the affected water body or bodies;
  • Determine whether the operators responsible for those activities have considered the most cost-effective options for reducing the impact of their activities;
  • Determine whether achieving the flow standards for 'good' status by 2015 would be disproportionately expensive.

4. If achieving the flow standards for 'good' status by 2015 would be disproportionately expensive or technically infeasible, identify what improvements could be feasible and proportionate and over what timescale they could be made.

5. Vary the conditions of authorisation for the relevant activities accordingly.

In the case of river flows, options to reduce impact might include:

  • looking at efficiency - can losses be reduced, e.g. by recycling, addressing leakage and wastage?
  • considering flexibility in supply or the potential to make arrangements with other abstractors:
  • is there scope to change or rotate abstraction locations in low flow periods?
  • is there scope to change the timing of abstraction?
  • considering alternative sources of water:
  • build 'offline' storage e.g. artificial pond, filled during winter for use during low flows
  • use mains supply as a 'top-up' or alternative in low flow periods
  • considering flexibility in business:
  • is there scope to switch processes away from high-demand operations during low flows?

Extremely low flows - 'Hands-off' restrictions

Where a water body is near the limit of its ability to accommodate abstraction in low flow periods, SEPA is unlikely to grant a new licence for abstraction during these periods. However, the water body may be able to accommodate new abstractions during higher flow periods. Therefore, SEPA may grant a new licence, but set conditions restricting abstraction to high flow periods only. This is sometimes called a 'hands-off' flow restriction, since the operator would have to stop or reduce abstraction when river flows fall below a specified level.

As well as identifying low flow standards, UKTAG recommended that, when the volume being abstracted exceeds 25% of the QN98 (low flows that, on average, only occur for 2% of a year), a 'hands-off flow' condition should be put in place and restrictions applied to the amount of water that can be abstracted (see Annex A).

However, the need to consider such restrictions in Scotland will be very rare. For the vast majority of river water bodies in Scotland, if the volume being abstracted is less than the UKTAG low flow standard, it will also be less than 25% of the QN98.

The few water bodies where this is not the case are typically steep, spate rivers which rise and fall rapidly in response to rainfall. The need to consider hands-off restrictions beyond those needed to achieve the UKTAG low flow standard will therefore be very rare. Where they do arise, SEPA will consider the costs involved in imposing any restrictions as well as the ecological risks.

Page updated: Tuesday, October 17, 2006