Scoping the Impacts on Travel Behaviour in Scotland of E-Working and Other ICTs

Listen

5.0 Travel Behaviour and E-working

5.1 Against the background of the development of ICT and e-working described in Chapters 2 to 4, there has also been research on the impact of evolving communications technology on travel behaviour and social change. This provides an extensive theoretical but limited empirical basis for this review, so this chapter reviews the relevant theory on:

  • The ICT factors that affect travel demand
  • Tools for travel demand management
  • Mechanisms of complementarity and substitution

5.2 It then reviews the empirical findings on:

  • The magnitude of the effects
  • The robustness of the evidence
  • The relevance of the research to Scotland

Factors affecting travel demand

5.3 In order to understand the role of ICT on travel demand, a broad approach is needed. Rather than simply predicting the demand for travel, transport planners need to recognise that travellers modify their behaviour to take account of the opportunities available to them. The availability of opportunities determines behaviour. If an opportunity is available which does not involve travel then people may travel less. If more opportunities become available and people can do more things then they may travel more. These laws of supply and demand underpin economic theory, but since travel is derived from wider economic and social needs, travel demand markets need to consider three dimensions to travel behaviour (Mohktarian and Salomon 2001):

  • The utility of arriving at a destination - This is the accessibility benefit, and depends on both the quality of the opportunity that can be reached and the travel or telecommunications options available.
  • The utility of activities that can be conducted whilst travelling - In most cases these activities can be undertaken without travelling ( e.g. listening to music, working, talking to friends, reading, thinking) but they help to increase the utility of a particular choice over other travel choices or non-travel alternatives.
  • The utility of travel itself - Numerous sports and hobbies revolve around travel for its own sake ( e.g. hiking). Almost by definition undirected travel is largely a leisure activity, so this element dominates for leisure travel.

5.4 Travel demand is derived from the economic and social needs of individuals and businesses. In order to assess how much travel there will be, it is first necessary to understand in sufficient detail the economic and social activities of the relevant population ( SACTRA 1994, DfT 2001).

5.5 If journeys to work are being replaced by telecommuting; trips to the high street are being replaced by online shopping; and business travel is being reduced by the use of teleconferencing, this substitution will replace travel demand. The reality is that there is a complex matrix of second-order effects, which will in many cases reduce or negate the traffic reduction effects to be expected from the simple substitution of real journeys for virtual activities (Cairns et al 2004). To understand the net impact of all these factors requires a detailed lifecycle assessment, and the aggregation of measured values for four different major kinds of impact (James 2004, Mokhtarian 1990):

Substitution

  • Replacement - telecommunications replaces travel.

Complementarity

  • Enhancement - directly stimulates travel by providing opportunities for people and businesses to achieve more and participate in more activities.
  • Efficiency - improves travel by making the transportation system more efficient.
  • Indirect impacts - impacts on land use and economic development which in turn affect travel, lifestyle changes with reductions in work travel being replaced by increases in leisure travel.

5.6 Within these broad categories some of the specific questions that need to be answered include (Lake 2004):

  • To what extent will latent demand be realised by other road users taking advantage of "liberated" road space?
  • To what extent will new trips be made by the home/telecentre worker during the course of the day that would otherwise not have been, or by other family members using the car?
  • How proportionately will transport substitution affect different traffic modes ( e.g. will regular public transport users become occasional car users)?
  • Will ICTs in due course affect location decisions so that people will tend to live further from their places of work, and therefore make fewer, but longer trips, and possibly contribute to urban sprawl?
  • What influence will more distributed life/work patterns have on the distribution and transportation of goods.

5.7 A more detailed discussion of the mechanisms associated with each of these effects is provided in Appendix C under the headings of: commuting, other work related travel, recreational travel, impacts on other household members, and mode and time shift. The extensive literature summarised in the Appendix shows that for each trip purpose and people group there are mechanisms to increase travel demand, and mechanisms to reduce demand. It suggests that the mechanisms are important for accurate travel demand estimation, but that it is difficult to generalise about which mechanisms are most important in which situations.

Policies and tools for travel demand management

Transport and planning policy

5.8 Although travel demand is derived from wider economic and social needs there are many ways that demand can be influenced by public policy. The adoption of e-working and its impacts, needs to be viewed within the context of the prevailing, and changing, policy and legislative framework.

5.9 E-working increases flexibility for people and businesses, increasing the scale of the responses shown in Table 5.1 for the main policy interventions used to influence travel demand (summarised from Scottish Executive 2003, Cairns et al 2004). E-working can therefore have both positive and negative impacts on travel demand dependent on the parallel complementary hard and smart measures being implemented.

Table 5.1 - Policy measures and demand management impacts

Policy Initiative

Tool

Impacts where ICT and e-work affect the scale of the change

Hard factors

Transport infrastructure changes

Traffic management, road and rail construction, improvements to facilities, bus shelters, pedestrian crossings, etc.

Will tend to increase demand if infrastructure capacity is provided and reduce demand if capacity is reduced.

Service changes and network management

Improved vehicles and trains

Speed limits, traffic cells, priority signalling, bus priority

Intelligent transport systems

Will tend to increase demand if travel times are reduced and reduce demand if travel times are increased.

Land use planning

New development location

Most development increases demand but development in inaccessible locations increases demand most.

Charges, taxes, and grants

Road/user parking charges and taxes

Public transport subsidies, fares

Generally reduce demand in line with charges

Facility and site improvements

Workplace/residential parking, lockers and changing facilities

Additional provision increases demand and reduced provision suppresses demand.

Smart measures

Regulatory measures

Encouragement for innovation, competition, diversity and efficiency

Regulation generally suppresses demand and innovation, competition, diversity and efficiency increase demand. Highly regulated public transport therefore currently suppresses demand relative to lightly regulated road transport.

Institutional support

School and workplace travel plans, employee training and development, personalised travel plans

Flexible work schedules, lifestyle support

Risk sharing for cost of backup for transport/personal emergencies/problems

Technological support for e-activities

These impacts relate to particular people to help manage business and lifestyles which can involve increases or reductions.

Information

Transport information, e-communications.

These encourage more efficient choices so will sometimes reduce travel demand but sometimes raise awareness or open up other options which increase demand.

Business development and marketing

Event management, site management, publicity, travel awareness, health awareness

These encourage better management of travel demand so will often support public transport use and car travel reduction. Marketing can also help events and businesses to be more successful which can lead to more travel.

Environmental policy

5.10 An influential factor in putting telework on the political agenda has been to promote it as a means for reducing greenhouse gases and nox emissions. The jump from assumptions about potential trip substitution to environmental impact without looking at the impacts on travel demand more explicitly, is common within policy due to presentational needs of organisations to "greenwash" their activities (Rye 2000).

5.11 More rigorous treatment of the relationships between environmental factors and transport policy show that a broad approach is needed which looks at both positive and negative responses (Goodwin 1997, SACTRA 1999). Narrow assumptions such "buses good/cars bad", or building roads to boost economic development, or in this case e-working improves the environment therefore have little to add to the evidence base.

5.12 The importance of environmental policy is that it is underpinned by a national and international policy and legislative framework that incentivises action on travel demand management measures such as e-working.

Employer policy

5.13 The importance of changes in the policies of human resource departments has already been identified as an important influence on the take up of e-working. Employment policy is also an important influence on mode choice with recent research in Glasgow (Scottish Executive 2003) showing that workplace and employment related conditions were the single most important factors restricting public transport mode choices for their journey to work accounting for 43% of those surveyed.

5.14 If people can only e-work if their employer lets them, and can only use public transport if they employment conditions allow this, then it follows that that management and administrative factors are amongst the most important influences on whether ICT and e-work will affect travel demand and traffic levels.

5.15 In many cases, more flexible employment conditions appear attractive to employers when they are promoting business relocation decisions. For example BBC Scotland decided to relocate all but a core news staff from Edinburgh to Glasgow. Many of the Edinburgh based staff did not wish to relocate their families to Glasgow and consequently retained their homes in Edinburgh and adopted e-working (bbc.co.uk). Other research shows that over time it can be expected that people will move house or job so short and long term impacts may be different.

5.16 Greater employment flexibility therefore can be associated with encouraging longer journeys to work and needs to be viewed alongside the relatively low commuting times currently observed in Scotland. There is therefore potential for ICT and e-working to stimulate significant increases in travel.

5.17 This is a poorly researched topic and requires longitudinal studies of employers in a range of sectors and locations. It is also highly topical with moves planned for the National Transport Agency in Scotland and Scottish Natural Heritage.

Land use policy and impacts

5.18 If people optimise their behaviour to take account of the opportunities open to them, and travel demand management seeks to limit increases in travel demand, then land use policy is perhaps the most important long term regulatory mechanism of government to control what activities take place ( ECOTEC 1993).

5.19 Although surveys of teleworkers show a fall in trip numbers, large rises in longer distance trips are observed ( TNO 2004, Cairns et al 2004). Therefore if e-working is encouraging more dispersed patterns of activity, then it follows that in the long term there could be substantial travel demand induced. National planning policy seeks to limit ( NPPG17/ SPG17) this with development planning and control seeking to reduce travel demand by improving opportunities for access to employment and other services. If e-working creates pressure for the development of extended suburbs (sometimes called exurbia), and this is not controlled by the development planning process then the travel demand implications could be substantial.

5.20 Given the current economic geography of Scotland it seems unlikely that planning policy will oppose housing development in for example rural Ayrshire, due to the needs for regeneration, or remote parts of the Highlands where population has been declining. The land use planning function will therefore be more likely to take advantage of the economic development benefits of e-working than the potential travel demand reduction benefits.

5.21 What seems clear is that whether it is driven primarily by e-working and ICT, or simply increased wealth and changes in social patterns, increasingly dispersed living has profound implications for travel demand, the spatial organisation of society, and the environment ( DHC 2005).

Magnitude of the effects

5.22 There is a large and conflicting evidence base on the magnitude of the interacting competing effects. This is not surprising and echoes more general findings on smart measures that the impact can be very large or very small depending on the extent to which e-working changes are supported locally by policies and parallel initiatives.

5.23 To achieve robust estimates of travel demand changes from e-working, it is necessary to look at all trip purposes, not just those related to work. In paragraph 0 it was noted that it is also necessary to look at the effect of telework adoption on people around the teleworker, including family members, local shops, recreational sites, postal services, and colleagues who remain in the work place.

5.24 Since the available research does not look comprehensively at these issues and is limited in other important ways, as discussed below from paragraph 0 to 0, there are major limitations on the scope for robust conclusions to be made about the magnitude of the effects. However, the research does help to scale the impacts by identifying from case studies how particular companies and groups of people have been affected by e-working and ICT.

5.25 Table 5.2 shows that the net mileage reductions vary from between 1243 to 8878 miles per annum, and Table 5.3 shows direct substitution effects of between 720 and 9000 miles per annum. If it is assumed that these reductions can be set against the average mileage travelled by Scottish residents from the Scottish Household Survey of about 6970miles (averaging 2000 to 2003 figures) then it is clear that very large proportional reductions may be being indicated.

5.26 If it is assumed that on any day 15% of the population in Scotland could telework (the upper bound from Chapter 4) and each of these could reduce their travel by 5000 miles (a rough average of the above reductions) then an upper bound estimate of travel demand reduction from teleworking would be 11%.

5.27 Table 5.3 provides a summary of the 30 case studies in 5 countries carried out as part of the Sustel project (Sustel 2004). This provides figures for average commuting savings, additional journeys undertaken and net rebound effects.

Table 5.2 Summary of Case study findings for Teleworking

Authors

Target Group

Substitution Effect

Complementary Effect

Net Effect

NOP (Gerarghty 2004)

1600 internet users who teleworked

Average 16.3 miles per round trip saved (ave 3.1 days p/ wk)

= -2324m pa

56% made non work journeys (ave. 4 miles ea.) whilst at home

12.3 miles saved per day

= -1754m pa

Shallabock et al., 2003

400 teleworkers in a Munich Insurance company

Ave. car mileage savings = 1,440,000 km pa

= -2237m pa

Reduction of car occupancy

Trips which could be combined with trips to and from work (19km weekly per teleworker)

Trips made by family workers because of car availability (72km per week per teleworker)

= total 640,000 km pa

=+994m pa

800,000 km/year = 2000 km pa per teleworker

= -1243m pa

Hopkinson and James 2003

20 BAA staff

Ave. reduction 61 miles p/wk

= -2806m pa*

Ave. increase of 16 new trip miles p/wk

= +736m pa

- 45 miles p/wk

= -2070m pa

Hopkinson and James 2003

199 BT staff registered with Workabout

Ave. car commuting reduced by 253m p/wk

= -11,638m pa

More non work trips

193 m p/wk saved

= -8878m pa

Hopkinson et al., 2001

103 AA call centre staff (67 responded)

Vehicle miles saved per employee

= -3680m pa

30-40% miles offset + some non work travel increased

= +1100-1470 pa

= -2210-2580 pa

Mitchell and Trodd 1994

70 teleworkers - Cross section of UK existing teleworkers

Results differ according to how many days a week working at home.

21% reported additional non work trips

Average reduction 113 miles p/wk

= -5876 m pa

Notes:

1. In this table both complementary and substitution effects are reported and standardised to vehicle miles saved per employee per annum.

2. Assumed that 46 weeks worked pa or 220 working days

Table 5.3 Case study findings for Teleworking

Authors

Target Group

Substitution Effect

Mesner 2002

23 volunteers 1 day p/wk, (Yorkshire and Humber)

- 1356m pa

Mesner 2002

East of England Development Agency

-3344m pa

Sustain IT 2002

19 workers at Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council

-720m pa

HOP Associates 2000-2003

65 staff Hereford County Council Trading Standards

-9000 m pa

Hop Associates 2001

145 RM Consulting staff

-1724m pa

Hop Associates 2001

ADAS Consulting

-2000m pa

Koenig et al 1996 and Niles 1990

40 participants California State Telecommuting Pilot 2

-1752m pa

Notes:

1. Only substitution effects are reported (standardised to vehicle miles saved per employee per annum (travel effects only))

2 . 1in work mileage = 5-8% reduction

3 . 2 on telecommuting days - ave. 1.3 days per week = -29.3m (Nilles 1990)

Table 5.4 - Summary of 30 Case Studies in five Countries

Denmark

Germany

Italy

Netherlands

UK - BT

UK - BAA

Mean estimate reductions in weekly commuting

(Km)

105

283

242

98

253

61

Mean estimated additional travel

(Km)

77

53

33

42

60

15

'Rebound effect' as a percentage of commuting savings

(%)

73

19

14

43

24

25

5.28 Before accepting at face value the very positive messages about traffic reduction in Tables 5.2 to 5.4 it is necessary to question carefully the assumptions and methods:

  • Representativeness and size of the sample - Staff selected for trials often had a personal vested interest in 'successful' outcomes or were chosen as 'best case' employees. Figures are also often based on respondent estimates. Also the current case study evidence provides little information on the differences between types of geographical locations
  • Companies undertaking research had vested interests in positive outcomes ( e.g.BT)
  • Duration of research - The theory suggests that longer term studies would be needed to observe most complementary effects so the relative importance of substitution may be being overestimated. For example longer term employee relocation changes may erode initial travel savings.
  • Scope - It may be that there are tasks which e-workers no longer undertake, such as attending meetings, that other staff backfill increasing travel demand elsewhere in the organisation. There is also a lack of measurement key data relating to car occupancy, public transport journeys and walking and cycling activity.
  • Definition - No two studies appear to define teleworking and calculate the results in exactly the same way.

5.29 It is also interesting to note from this review that the type of organisation undertaking the studies appears to have an influence over the outcome with:

  • Most policy makers and large employers being confident about net traffic reduction impacts - e.g "overwhelming evidence that telework does lead to reductions in travel with expected traffic reduction impacts of teleworking between 2 and 15% taking place progressively over a decade" ( DTLR 2002)..
  • Academic studies being generally much more cautious - "while the direct effects of teleworking may be to reduce travel, the wider effects of telework and other ICT use is to generate a sufficient number of new trips to eliminate the benefit or even to increase traffic levels" (Akiva, Niles)

5.30 A major obscuring factor, making longitudinal research difficult, is that both ICT uptake and car usage are increasing in parallel as a result of an expanding economy and improvements in technology ( STELLA 2004), so it is very hard to unpick from this how much the two interact with each other.

5.31 Although there may be doubt about the precise impacts on traffic levels, there is however a broad consensus that the promotion of ICT and e-working is a good thing. The improvements in accessibility and choice, and the flexibility offered through new networking opportunities, mean that successful e-working solutions are consistent with sustainable transport and development agendas.

Relevance to Scotland

5.32 Although several of the studies in Table 5.2 include samples within Scotland, the results have not been presented in a way which allows disaggregation to particular places. There is however some evidence that ICT and e-working may have a greater impact on Scotland due to:

  • Some of the remotest parts of Europe - The strongest adoption of e-living is being seen in other widely distributed nations like Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Finland (Mitchell 2005, Heinonen 1998).
  • A high proportion of people living in small towns of between 3,000 and 10,000 people which have relatively poor accessibility and where e-networks can therefore make the greatest impact.
  • Two thirds of all jobs located in the four largest city conurbations (Scottish Executive 2002) meaning that spatial policies to distribute economic activity relies on improved networks.

5.33 Further research is needed to project the current knowledge about travel impacts of ICT and e-working to fit the context of Scotland's changing geography and demography. Scotland is to be one of the first countries in the world with 100% broadband coverage, and e-working may well present greater opportunities than for other countries. There are therefore likely to be greater positive and negative impacts on travel demand. Further work will however be needed to assess the balance between substituted and induced travel effects in different contexts to identify whether this will lead to net increases or decreases in travel.

Traffic levels

5.34 If messages about the impacts on overall travel demand impacts are complex then much greater clarity can be achieved by unpicking the components that could lead to traffic reduction.

5.35 The research is very clear. The increased flexibility and availability of information provided by ICT and e-working allows people to improve efficiency and this includes avoiding congested sections of roads at peak times of day (James 2004, Cairns 2004). An unaltered (or even slightly increased) burden of traffic distributed more evenly across the day can make very substantial reductions in congestion. There is currently no generally agreed definition of congestion but most approaches relate to the avoidance of delays and the reliability of journey times ( NAO 2004). The difference between peak and off peak journey times and the reliability of trips at all times of day can be improved if travellers:

  • Can choose when to travel
  • Know when problems arise and avoid using the affected modes or locations at these times

5.36 Flexibility and choice are stronger attributes for car travel than they are for public transport (Stradling 2001). It is therefore not surprising that there is a consistent finding that e-working impacts more upon reducing public transport use than car use (Lyons 2002). It also appears to allow people to switch mode and use their car at an uncongested time of day.

5.37 E-working is therefore no different from any other demand management intervention with both "push" and "pull" interventions being needed to achieve desired aims. Without "push" measures such as road capacity reduction or road pricing, increased flexibility for users allows them to fill up spare capacity on the road network throughout the day (Gillespie et al and Salomon, Lake 2004).

Summary of travel behaviour impacts

5.38 Overall the conclusion of this analysis is that the flexibility offered by new e-opportunities allows public agencies to secure social and environmental benefits for communities through travel demand reduction measures, but also allows individuals and businesses to travel more. To secure the potential travel demand reduction effects, there would need to be a significant increase in complementary measures to manage travel demand.

5.39 Figure 5.1 shows the main mechanisms for change.

main mechanisms for change diagram

Figure 5.1 - ICT and e-work influences on travel demand

5.40 The potential traffic reduction benefits are significant. E-working can help to uncouple long term relationships between economic activity and travel demand. Based on the international evidence and case studies, a managed approach could achieve travel demand reductions of up to 11% in the Scottish context. Much greater reductions in congestion are also possible by making better use of exiting capacity.

5.41 To achieve this level of traffic reduction and congestion relief would require a step change increase in activity on travel demand management policies involving:

  • Transport infrastructure and service changes
  • Land use planning and facility and site improvements at homes and workplaces
  • Charges, taxes, and grants
  • Regulatory measures
  • Institutional support such as workplace travel plans and flexible working patterns
  • Information, business development and marketing initiatives

5.42 However even if the travel demand increases exceed the efficiency benefits, there remains a broad consensus that the promotion of ICT and e-working is a good thing, with improvements in accessibility and choice being generally consistent with sustainable transport and development agendas.

Page updated: Tuesday, May 23, 2006