Enhanced Fees Consultation Response Glasgow Caledonian University

DescriptionEnhanced Fees Consultation Response Glasgow Caledonian University
ISBN
Official Print Publication Date
Website Publication DateApril 04, 2006
Glasgow Cali Logo

Our Ref IAJ/RMcM

21 December 2005

Lindsay Conn

Scottish Executive

ETLL Department

Higher Education and Science Division

Europa Building

450 Argyle Street

GLASGOW G2 8LG

Dear Lindsay

DRAFT STUDENT FEES (SPECIFICATION)(SCOTLAND) ODER 2005

This is Glasgow Caledonian University's response to the consultation issticd with your letter of 16 November following consideration by our Court and Senate . Our response can be in the public record - see your Annex G attached .

We have responded to previous consultations on this subject and our comments (attached here) remain valid, and we would wish them to be taken fully into account.

However, additionally, we would wish to point out that the Order is unlikely to be finalised before 1 June 2006, but students are applying now for admission in September 2006 . For medical schools the UCAS admissions process has already closed . This means students have had to make decisions on vague and conditional information . The best course of action for the Executive would be to defer the introduction to 07/08. In addition to giving students definitive information on which to make decisions, this would allow an assessment to be made by the Executive of the actual effect on student demand of top-up fees in England, not guesses as at present.

We remain concerned that :

i the Executive has introduced the principle of varying fees by subject and may attempt to manipulate the market in other subjects later.
ii students from less well-off families in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will be put off from studying in Scotland.

iii Students from the EU will be encouraged to study in Scotland rather than England, therefore displacing Scottish students which is the outcome the Executive is seeking to avoid.

iv Unpredictable turbulence in student numbers at each institution in Scotland will be introduced, though this could be mitigated by SFC extending the current flexibility in the cap on full-time numbers to, say, ±5%.

v Differentiating students from Lockerbie, Dublin and Brussels, on the one hand, who pay no fees, from students from Carlisle, Belfast and Cardiff on the other hand who will is hard to justify and potentially challengeable.

We are led to believe by Universities Scotland that the Executive intends that students paying these enhanced fees will be entitled, on a family means-tested basis, to £300 bursaries pa. This is welcome, in principle, but the lack of clarification of how this will operate in practice will reduce its impact in the first year . Also, the evidence in England is that because the topup fees are paid direct to the Universities, most Universities intend to use part of these additional resources to offer supplementary bursaries above the obligatory £300 . This opportunity will not be available to Universities in Scotland because the Executive intends to reduce the grant to Universities to exactly offset the extra fee income . So, Scottish Universities will have no funding for supplementary bursaries.

For all these reasons we believe it would be preferable not to proceed with these selective top-up fees and instead to marginally increase the cap and review the position in October 2006.

Yours sincerely

DR IAN JOHNSTON CB DL

Principal and Vice-Chancellor

Encs Annex G

Previous GCU submission

Respondent Information Form : Consultation On The Draft Student Fees (Specification) (Scotland) Order 2005

Please complete the details below and return it with your response . This will help ensure we handle your response appropriately. Thank you for Your help.

Name:

Postal Address :

Are you responding : (please tick one box)

(a) as an individual Q go to Q2a/b and then Q4

(b) on behalf of agroup/organisation go to Q3 and then Q4 Ticked

ON BEHALF O F GROUPS OR ORGANI SATIONS :

3 The name and address of yo ur organisation will be made available to the public ( in the Scottish Executive library and /or on the Scottish Executive web site) . Are you a lso content for your response to be made available ?

Yes Ticked

No

SHARING RESPONSES/FUTURF, ENGAGEMENT

4 We will share your response internally with other Scottish Executive policy teams who may be addressing the issues You discuss . They may wish to contact you again in the future, but we require your permission to do so . Are you content for the Scottish Executive to contact you again in the future in relation to this consultation response ?

Yes ticked

No



Page updated: Friday, April 21, 2006