This document is also available in pdf format (472k)
EFFICIENT GOVERNMENT FUND
Stage 1 application - expression of interest
Part 1: Summary Table
Bid number (for EG use) | |
Lead bidder | Aberdeen City Council Jim Lamb Assistant Director (Business Services) Finance & ICT Services Tel: 01224 522121 e-mail: jiml@aberdeencity.gov.uk |
Brief description of the aims of the project | The vision is the creation of an ICT Shared Infrastructure/Service Centre which will standardise and bring together the delivery of agreed core IT and communication services for participating public sector organisations in Grampian. This would enable the future potential for other support services to be shared leading to further service improvements and efficiency savings. |
Clear description of what the EGF money would be used to buy | - Development costs to allow organisations to move to common systems within the EGF timeframes.
- Legal, consultancy & training costs to set up any new organisational arrangements and 3 rd party contracts.
- Incremental equipment and building costs required to establish a shared purpose-built data centre.
|
Partners to the project likely to commit resources | Aberdeen City Council Aberdeenshire Council Moray Council Aberdeen University Robert Gordon University Aberdeen College Grampian Police Grampian Fire & Rescue. |
Names of other organisations with whom the project has been discussed (to assist the introductions process) | Scottish Enterprise Grampian NHS Grampian |
Evidence that suggested approach has been deployed successfully elsewhere | - Syndicate of 5 Councils in New South Wales with a "single solution" for all Councils
- Evidence of savings through economies of scale (e.g. Middlesborough, Redcar and Cleveland)
- NHS Shared Services Initiatives;
- Many private sector examples in multi-divisional companies (e.g. Accenture, HP)
- Ontario Government Shared Services Bureau
- Recognised as best practice in UK Government publications and guidance
|
Are there any restrictions to enlargement of the project (i.e. number of partners) | In principal no, but the key challenge is reaching agreement on common standards and systems and the associated governance arrangements that can be supported by all partners. The complexity of achieving this would rise significantly if the number of partners increased and it is considered that an initial implementation is best done within the Grampian region, where organisations already work closely together and key decision makers have met regularly to develop this concept over the past 2 years. For organisations with charitable status (e.g. Universities), VAT levied on staff employed under some shared vehicle is an additional cost that cannot be reclaimed and will remain a significant barrier to participation. The first 17.5% efficiency savings on any staff costs are lost to VAT under these arrangements. |
Benefits projected from the project | Through rationalisation and economies of scale, the project will achieve cost savings on ongoing operations, further savings through sharing of future development costs, and the provision of more comprehensive ICT services than would otherwise be possible with organisations acting individually. Specifically, disaster recovery planning and stronger IT security would be more affordably achieved. The adoption of a common communication and IT platform will create opportunities for more flexible working and collaboration across the region. This project is also a pre-requisite to the development of shared services and integrated business processes in other support areas - e.g. HR, Call Centres, Finance and Procurement. Taken to their full potential, these developments will benefit citizens in the region who would experience a truly integrated, proactive public service. A single call or single contact would handle any type of request for service. |
Estimated financial projections | Total | 2005/6 | 2006/7 | 2007/8 | 2008/9 | 2009/10 |
Overall project cost | 7,709 | 120 | 4,503 | 2543 | 543 | 0 |
Estimated projected benefits (for years beyond 2009/10 savings are predicted to increase marginally for no further cost - see Table B) | 13,339 | | 2,347 | 4,450 | 3,465 | 3,086 |
Cumulative Net Benefits | | -120 | -2276 | -369 | 2544 | 5630 |
(to be verified through discovery phase) | At this stage there are a number of options as to how the project could develop and its potential scale. The costs and benefits are therefore tentative figures to be verified at the discovery phase leading to a full business case in the phase 2 bid. The benefits would be continual. |
Is a pilot required - see guidance notes | No. |
Additionally: why is EG funding required | This project represents a radical restructuring of the way in which public sector ICT is delivered and requires substantial up front investment for implementation. It is unlikely that the local partners, although enthusiastic about the project, could afford the full initial investment. In addition, some of the significant issues to resolve will be those around governance and the change management of aligning systems and processes across different organisations. The profile and commitment of an EG funded initiative and the associated accountability to achieve milestones for the release of funds will in itself provide participating organisations with the focus to implement this project. |
Is this project complementary in any way to other EG work | Yes, this project is fundamental to the achievement of key aims of the EG programme. The process of ICT integration planned for this project is a pre-requisite to achieving wider service integration across other support activities. |
Is "stage 2 development funding" requested? | Yes. The level of detail required for a stage 2 bid will require a full analysis of IT delivery across participating organisations, and a detailed cost and service delivery model for the implementation of new arrangements and substantiation of anticipated benefits. This "discovery" phase will require the assistance of external consultants working with partner technical specialists. The sum of £120K is required in 2005/6 to cover this work. |
Part 2: Background and Context.
Background.
Over the past 3 years, the Grampian Joint Public Sector ICT Sub-Group has met on a number of occasions to consider opportunities for public sector organisations to work more closely together and what the potential benefits might be. The group concluded that there would be significant immediate benefits arising from the development of a common/shared ICT infrastructure that will service the needs of each individual organisation while facilitating future aspects of joined-up working, to the benefit of the regional community.
The Stage 1 application in this document (re-submission) refers to the establishment of that common/shared ICT infrastructure. This Narrative Bid, for information, puts this bid into the context of a wider future vision that the ICT Sub-Group has developed and will be exploring further with other sub-groups within the overall Joint Public Sector Group.
Overall Objectives
Achievement of the principles of the Efficient Government programme will demand significant change to current support and administrative services. In recent years the application of new technology has delivered many process efficiencies within organisations, but opportunities for further improvement will be primarily through the integration and sharing of technologies and support services across public sector organisations. In addition to further efficiencies, this will bring real changes to the way in which frontline support services are delivered to the public. A single, shared ICT infrastructure, operating across a 'region' will be fundamental to the implementation of significant inter-organisation business process change in other areas.
The initial priority of the Grampian Joint Public Sector ICT Sub-Group is therefore the development of a common/shared ICT infrastructure that will service the needs of each individual organisation while facilitating future aspects of joined-up working, to the benefit of the regional community.
The longer-term vision is one of integrated services for local people with a proactive, customer-oriented approach that will deal with ALL their issues at a single point of contact. Integration will extend to many areas of service provision, eliminating duplication and significantly reducing operational and training costs. Such change could lead to a regional budget provision and organisation for the support of a range of local services.
Essential Elements
The initial project relates to the ICT infrastructure with the creation of a single data centre with common data storage, servers and communications network.
This can be best explained through the concept of the 'Pyramid of Opportunity' that explains the major steps towards the radical change that this project will bring.

The pyramid represents a ground upwards view of the various elements of the ICT Infrastructure showing their relative difficulties in terms of potential integration and sharing. At the base is the technological infrastructure foundation (the servers, routers, cabling, etc.) where the greatest degree of common requirements and shared protocols may be found. At the apex are both the organisation specific services that are unlikely to benefit from integration and also the common CRM solution that will be complex to achieve but where the rewards would be the full achievement of the goals of the Efficient Government programme.
The project to achieve full integration would replicate the building of the Pyramid.

The first phase, for which this "stage 1" bid has been submitted, will lead towards the creation of a common data centre and electronic data storage repository. Common telecommunications networks (voice and data) will also be investigated and implemented in accordance with the long-term vision. Migration plans will be developed for each organisation to close their own operations and move them to the new data centre. Initially, the functions that will be moved across will be the commodity type IT services such as file and print services, e-mail, web-hosting, authentication, telephony and network management. Further migration will take place as part of the business process changes within step 3. As common telecommunications facilities are established, all public sector employees within Grampian will have common telephone and e-mail systems, facilitating further business process integration.
The management and governance arrangements for this shared infrastructure would be established early on (see Step 2).

As part of STEP 1 there will be an early need to create a framework for ICT decision making and governance to be adopted by each participating organisation. This might start with the commencement of joint projects and the sharing of scarce specialist resources, but early on it is likely that the management of the shared infrastructure would have to be undertaken by a common body rather than by individual public sector organisations. This might require new organisational arrangements, perhaps with a strategic private sector partnership.
Further benefits can be realised if the base ICT infrastructure is expanded to allow the sharing of common back-office systems coupled with sharing and restructuring of the relevant support departments and business processes (Finance, HR, Payroll etc). The public sector support-unit leaders will drive the necessary change, remodelling and re-engineering their processes to take advantage of the opportunity offered by the new ICT infrastructure.

Steps 1, 2 and 3 are largely concerned with arrangements for back office services. At the apex of the pyramid, there are opportunities to develop shared front-line services which directly interface with citizens and other end-users. Agreeing a shared approach to these services will be more difficult due to the different characteristics and needs of participating organisations. One example, however, would be the introduction of a common Citizen Relationship Management System. This would be a significant achievement for the public sector organisations within Grampian and the people served by them. The implementation of such a system would be complemented by a common (telephony) Call Centre where a single telephone number would gain access to a service co-ordinator that could accept queries and service requests across public sector organisations. The system would be replicated across each service interface channel (i.e. web, telephone, e-mail, mobile communication) such that the citizen can expect a comprehensive service, no matter how they wish to communicate with the regional public sector organisation.
Implementation.
The Joint Public Sector ICT Sub-Group considers that there are 3 key implementation phases for this vision:
- The establishment of a base shared ICT infrastructure (the subject of the Stage 1 bid to the Efficient Government Fund). The resourcing, management and governance arrangements for any shared organisation would be put in place at this stage.
- The establishment of shared back-office services which build on and take advantage of the shared ICT infrastructure.
- The establishment, where appropriate, of shared frontline citizen support services.
The focus of activities to date has largely been around (1).
Prior to each phase of the project, there will be significant preparatory work and detailed analysis required, and an understanding of current arrangements, costs, service levels and forward plans. In particular, agreement and support from business-unit leaders will be required and agreed requirements drawn up for organisations to align to shared common systems and business processes.
External specialists would be contracted to assist with this work. An additional output would be a framework for future ICT decision making and spend that would be adopted by each of the participating partners.
Compelling Reasons
The local partners had been engaged in the Community Planning process for some time and had therefore worked methodically towards a joint view that the time was now right to make the step change that this project would entail.
The project will require substantial funding. While the partners are keen to participate and in any case would be committing funding to it, the additional funding and profile of the Efficient Government programme will greatly increase the chances of success for this initiative.
While it is only possible at this time to estimate what the costs and benefits will be, it's clear that this vision is fully aligned with the Efficient Government programme.
The creation of an integrated ICT infrastructure is a key strategic starting point. If this change does not happen then the vision of integrated public service will be significantly more difficult to achieve.
Benefits
There are both direct benefits and added benefits that a project of this nature will bring.
Efficiency savings will accrue from two sources:
- From an ICT context there will be direct benefits from the economies of scale that the integration will bring.
- The integrated ICT infrastructure will facilitate business process change leading to rationalisation of the computer systems in use and new, more efficient ways of working.
The actual costs and savings are to be identified following a 'Discovery' phase where detailed information will be gathered on the current partner infrastructures. This information will be utilised to plan the new purpose-built data centre and identify which technologies will be reusable and which will need to be replaced. It is through this phase of work that the real costs and savings will be identified.
The integration of business processes across the public sector will lead to improved service delivery to the citizens of Grampian. Through electronic data integration it can be ensured that citizens are not asked repetitively for the same information and can be communicated with proactively, with all their public services offered through a single point of contact. Similarly, citizen access to electronic service delivery via web portals will be enabled through common authentication facilities. The real benefits will be to these citizens who will receive significantly enhanced services funded through efficiency savings.
Further benefits which are of significance are:
- Disaster Recovery ( DR)
Rather than several public sector organisations making separate and independent arrangements for disaster recovery, the establishment of a shared ICT infrastructure allows DR facilities and provisions to be shared as well. This will both reduce costs and provide a level of disaster recovery that would otherwise probably be difficult to fund. - Teleworking /Flexible Working Options.
The set up of the new ICT infrastructure could be adapted to allow for a higher proportion of teleworking and other flexible working options. This would allow employees to work from home or other 'offices' connected to the network. This would not need to be specific to a single organisation. New network links would allow all public service employees more flexible access to the network and ICT-based services, across Grampian. - Single Communications Infrastructure.
All employees within the public sector would be connected via the same telephone and e-mail systems facilitating greater inter-working and collaboration.
Justification of Cost Savings
Through the operation of a shared infrastructure, specialist consultants have identified that substantial savings are achievable for this type of project. Mindful of such savings current "actuals" for each of the participants have been identified (Table A) and a cashflow table for the establishment of a common ICT infrastructure together with continuing operational costs has been prepared (Table B). These tables are the basis of the headline costs/savings outlined on page 2 of this submission.
It should be noted that it is thought unlikely that all participants would attempt to transfer to a common ICT infrastructure at the same time. In reality, a likely scenario is that the participants would form 3 separate tranches and would convert at approximately 1-year intervals. Tables A and B are based on suggested tranches of:
- Aberdeen City, Grampian Fire and Rescue, Robert Gordon University.
- Aberdeenshire, Grampian Police, University of Aberdeen.
- Moray, Aberdeen College (plus any other late entrants)
An example of the adoption of large-scale joint ICT inter-working is an innovative solution from Australia is the "G5" Councils on-line solution. This relates to a 10 year business transformation relationship that had a "Go Live" date of March 15 th 2004. This initiative attracted £54 million private sector funding offered in a 10-year PPP deal. The savings are expected to be between £120M and £140M over 10 years between the 5 Councils. This represents available savings of between 4 and 5% of budget per annum.
The initial envisaged project described in this bid could develop into a wider project of this nature.
The "G5" Syndicate Business case is already delivering significant savings in a number of areas:
High Level Benefits
- 5% improvement in the efficiency of development approvals
- 1% efficiency improvement for half of all computer facing workforce
- Exceeding the 1-2% productivity savings targeted from integrated applications c.f. disparate systems
- 0.5% reduction in corporate overhead
- 30% improvement in the efficiency of purchasing processes
- 20% efficiency improvement in financial reporting
- 10 to 20% improvement in the efficiency in HR administration
- 40% reductions in call centre activity through the use of integrated CRM & Asset Management System and workflow
Other Benefits
- 25% reduction in inventory management effort
- 10% reduction in asset maintenance costs
- 20% reduction in contract management effort
- 10% reduction in plant and fleet and materials costs
- 10% reduction in property management work effort
- 5% reduction off the value of purchases
- 50% reduction in bank reconciliation work effort
- 20% reduction in cycle time in regulation processes
- 20% reduction in financial reporting work effort
- 25% reduction in accounts receivable work effort
- 20% reduction in cycle times in accounts payable processes
- 20% reduction in records management and processing
The detailed work planned for Phase 2 will help clarify the benefits achievable by the "Grampian Public Partnership".
The following tables give some indicative savings based on what will be achievable in the early phases of the project. The evidence from the "G5 Syndicate" suggests that there is the potential in later phases for significantly more savings.
Commitment of Partners
The partners have been working together for over two years, investigating a number of different potential project areas where inter-working would be beneficial. The resultant bid has the support of all the partners highlighted earlier.
There are however some constraints placed on full participation through the need for certain organisations to adhere to national initiatives and regulations that have the potential to conflict with a regional scheme.
At present the participants can be categorised as follows:
a. Those for whom there is no known reason why they could/should not participate in full joint working/networking:
Local Authorities: Aberdeen City, Aberdeenshire, Moray.
Higher Education: RGU, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen College.
b. Those for whom there is no known reason why they could/should not participate in full joint working/networking but who are unable to commit because their future is under discussion/unknown:
Grampian Fire and Rescue.
c. Those whose existing operational policies and/or national strategies have the potential to conflict to a significant level with regional joint working/networking:
Grampian Police - Government Secure Classification Scheme.
(Note: Due to national NHS initiatives, NHS Grampian has indicated that they are unable to participate at this time.)
Value Added Tax
Higher Education ( HE) and Further Education ( FE) institutions have charitable status and are not therefore able to fully reclaim VAT charged on services supplied. It is possible that the delivery of shared services is best achieved through the establishment of a Special Purpose Vehicle ( SPV) (e.g. Company limited by guarantee) with staff transferred to that SPV. Services supplied by those staff to HE and FE institutions would, however, immediately be subject to VAT. Effectively, therefore, under any such arrangements HE and FE institutions must achieve 17.5% efficiency gains on the use of staff resources simply to "stand still".
This is a significant barrier to participation for HE and FE institutions and erodes the potential benefits that can be achieved. The Joint Public Sector ICT Sub-Group would welcome some assistance in resolving this issue.
TABLE A
CURRENT ANNUAL CAPITAL
In '000s | Aberdeen City | Aberdeen-shire | Moray* | Grampian Police | Grampian Fire | RGU | University of Aberdeen | Aberdeen College* | | City, Fire & RGU | Shire, Police & Uni | Moray & Coll |
|---|
New Investment in new Networking Technologies | 145 | 170 | 70 | 260 | | 317 | 143 | 69 | 1174 | 462 | 573 | 139 |
|---|
Network Maintenance | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
New server and storage technologies | 500 | 170 | 70 | 100 | 6 | 75 | 304 | 57 | 1282 | 581 | 574 | 127 |
|---|
Server and storage maintenance | 43 | | | | | | | | 43 | 43 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
Additional data centre enhancements | 69 | 50 | 20 | | 6 | | | | 145 | 75 | 50 | 20 |
|---|
| 757 | 390 | 160 | 360 | 12 | 392 | 447 | 126 | 2644 | 1161 | 1197 | 286 |
|---|
CURRENT ANNUAL REVENUE
| Aberdeen City | Aberdeen-shire | Moray* | Grampian Police | Grampian Fire | RGU | University of Aberdeen | Aberdeen College* | | City, Fire & RGU | Shire, Police & Uni | Moray & Coll |
|---|
New Investment in new Networking Technologies | | 100 | 40 | | | | | | 140 | 0 | 100 | 40 |
|---|
Network Maintenance | 117 | 200 | 80 | 620 | 5 | 93 | 85 | 27 | 1227 | 215 | 905 | 107 |
|---|
Network Support Staff | 206 | 140 | 40 | 52 | 10 | 148 | 132 | 42 | 770 | 364 | 324 | 82 |
|---|
New server and storage technologies | | 60 | 24 | | 2 | | | | 86 | 2 | 60 | 24 |
|---|
Server and storage maintenance | 221 | 207 | 83 | 200 | 3 | 20 | 22 | 7 | 763 | 244 | 429 | 90 |
|---|
Server/Storage Support Staff | 455 | 245 | 98 | 52 | 10 | 156 | 190 | 52 | 1258 | 621 | 487 | 150 |
|---|
Additional data centre costs | 26 | | 12 | 70 | 5 | | | | 113 | 31 | 70 | 12 |
|---|
Additional data centre staffing | | | | | | 92 | 240 | | 332 | 92 | 240 | 0 |
|---|
| 1025 | 952 | 377 | 994 | 35 | 509 | 669 | 128 | 4689 | 1569 | 2615 | 505 |
|---|
TABLE B
GRAMPIAN PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP CASHFLOW
STAGE 1 BID (RESUBMISSION) ('000s)
| 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/110 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 |
|---|
CAPITAL | | | | | | | |
|---|
Investment in consultancy | 120 | | | | | | |
|---|
Capital expenditure Ab City, Gramp Fire & RGU | 1161 | 383 | | | | | |
|---|
Capital expenditure Ab Shire, Gramp Police & U of Ab | 1197 | 1197 | 399 | | | | |
|---|
Capital expenditure Moray, Ab Coll | 286 | 286 | 286 | 95 | | | |
|---|
Capital costs to install infrastructure for Ab City, Gramp Fire & RGU | 2700 | | | | | |
|---|
Capital costs to add/combine infrastructure for Ab Shire, Gramp Police & U os Ab | 940 | | | | |
|---|
Capital costs to add/combine infrastructure for Moray & Ab Coll | | | 240 | | | |
|---|
Capital cost to maintain GPP infrastructure. | | | 710 | 1320 | 1586 | 1586 | 1586 |
|---|
| | | | | | |
2764 | 4566 | 2335 | 1655 | 1586 | 1586 | 1586 |
| | | | | | |
REVENUE | | | | | | | |
|---|
Revenue expenditure Ab City, Gramp Fire & RGU | 1569 | | | | | | |
|---|
Revenue expenditure Ab Shire, Gramp Police & U of Ab | 2615 | 2615 | | | | | |
|---|
Revenue expenditure Moray, Ab Coll | 505 | 505 | 505 | | | | |
|---|
Revenue costs of operating infrastructure for Ab City, Gramp Fire & RGU | 1803 | | | | | |
|---|
Additional revenue costs to add/combine operations for Ab Shire, Gramp Police & U of Ab | 1603 | | | | |
|---|
Additional revenue costs to add/combine operations for Moray & Ab Coll | | 303 | | | |
|---|
Revenue cost to operate GPP infrastructure. | | | 1023 | 2592 | 2895 | 2895 | 2895 |
|---|
| | | | | | |
4689 | 4923 | 3131 | 2895 | 2895 | 2895 | 2895 |
VALUE OF ADDITIONAL BENEFITS | | | | | | | |
|---|
Attributable to AbCity, Gramp Fire & RGU: | | | | | | | |
|---|
Adoption of common systems where practicable | | | 30 | 45 | 55 | 55 | 55 |
|---|
Estimate of benefits of CRM | | | | 20 | 40 | 70 | 100 |
|---|
Estimate of value in better contingency capability | | | 10 | 25 | 35 | 45 | 55 |
|---|
Attributable to Ab Shire, Gramp Police & U of A | | | | | | | |
|---|
Adoption of common systems where practicable | | | | 30 | 45 | 55 | 55 |
|---|
Estimate of benefits of CRM | | | | | 20 | 40 | 70 |
|---|
Estimate of value in better contingency capability | | | | 10 | 25 | 35 | 45 |
|---|
Attributable to Moray & Ab Coll | | | | | | | |
|---|
Adoption of common systems where practicable | | | | | 7 | 10 | 15 |
|---|
Estimate of benefits of CRM | | | | | | 5 | 10 |
|---|
Estimate of value in better contingency capability | | | | | 7 | 10 | 12 |
|---|
| | | | | | | |
|---|
Total | 0 | 0 | 40 | 130 | 234 | 325 | 417 |
|---|
| | | | | | | |
|---|
|
|---|
Nett benefits | -120 | -2156 | 1907 | 2913 | 3086 | 3177 | 3269 |
|---|
|
|---|
Cumulative Benefits | -120 | -2276 | -369 | 2544 | 5630 | 8807 | 12076 |
|---|
|
|---|
Additional Investment (Capital) | 120 | 2700 | 940 | 240 | | | |
|---|
Ongoing Investment (Capital) | 2644 | 1866 | 1395 | 1415 | 1586 | 1586 | 1586 |
|---|
Total Capital | 2764 | 4566 | 2335 | 1655 | 1586 | 1586 | 1586 |
|---|
Additional Revenue | | 1803 | 1603 | 303 | | | |
|---|
Ongoing Revenue | 4689 | 3120 | 1528 | 2592 | 2895 | 2895 | 2895 |
|---|
Total Revenue | 4689 | 4923 | 3131 | 2895 | 2895 | 2895 | 2895 |
|---|
Additional Benefit | | | 40 | 130 | 234 | 325 | 417 |
|---|
| 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/110 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 |
|---|
Capital Savings | -120 | -1922 | 309 | 989 | 1058 | 1058 | 1058 |
|---|
Revenue Savings | 0 | -234 | 1558 | 1794 | 1794 | 1794 | 1794 |
|---|
Additional Benefits | 0 | 0 | 40 | 130 | 234 | 325 | 417 |
|---|
|
|---|
Total Savings/Benefits | -120 | -2156 | 1907 | 2913 | 3086 | 3177 | 3269 |
|---|
|
|---|
Total Additional Costs | 120 | 4503 | 2543 | 543 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
Total Anticipated Savings | 0 | 2347 | 4450 | 3456 | 3086 | 3177 | 3269 |
|---|
Cumulative benefits | -120 | -2276 | -369 | 2544 | 5630 | 8807 | 12076 |
|---|
|
|---|
Cumulative costs to 2009/10 | 120 | 4623 | 7166 | 7709 | 7709 | | |
|---|
Cumulative benefits to 2009/10 | 0 | 2347 | 6797 | 10253 | 13339 | | |
|---|
Cumulative net benefits | -120 | -2276 | -369 | 2544 | 5630 | | |
|---|