EGF - Stage 1 - 065 - Aberdeen ICT - Bid

DescriptionSTATUS - INVITED TO SUBMIT STAGE 2 BID - To create an ICT Shared Infrastructure/Service Centre which will standardise and bring together the delivery of agreed core IT and communications services for participating public sector organisations.
ISBN
Official Print Publication DateJuly 2005
Website Publication DateMarch 07, 2006

    Listen

    This document is also available in pdf format (472k)

    EFFICIENT GOVERNMENT FUND

    Stage 1 application - expression of interest

    Part 1: Summary Table

    Bid number (for EG use)

    Lead bidder

    Aberdeen City Council
    Jim Lamb
    Assistant Director (Business Services)
    Finance & ICT Services
    Tel: 01224 522121
    e-mail: jiml@aberdeencity.gov.uk

    Brief description of the aims of the project

    The vision is the creation of an ICT Shared Infrastructure/Service Centre which will standardise and bring together the delivery of agreed core IT and communication services for participating public sector organisations in Grampian. This would enable the future potential for other support services to be shared leading to further service improvements and efficiency savings.

    Clear description of what the EGF money would be used to buy

    • Development costs to allow organisations to move to common systems within the EGF timeframes.
    • Legal, consultancy & training costs to set up any new organisational arrangements and 3 rd party contracts.
    • Incremental equipment and building costs required to establish a shared purpose-built data centre.

    Partners to the project likely to commit resources

    Aberdeen City Council
    Aberdeenshire Council
    Moray Council
    Aberdeen University
    Robert Gordon University
    Aberdeen College
    Grampian Police
    Grampian Fire & Rescue.

    Names of other organisations with whom the project has been discussed (to assist the introductions process)

    Scottish Enterprise Grampian

    NHS Grampian

    Evidence that suggested approach has been deployed successfully elsewhere

    • Syndicate of 5 Councils in New South Wales with a "single solution" for all Councils
    • Evidence of savings through economies of scale (e.g. Middlesborough, Redcar and Cleveland)
    • NHS Shared Services Initiatives;
    • Many private sector examples in multi-divisional companies (e.g. Accenture, HP)
    • Ontario Government Shared Services Bureau
    • Recognised as best practice in UK Government publications and guidance

    Are there any restrictions to enlargement of the project (i.e. number of partners)

    In principal no, but the key challenge is reaching agreement on common standards and systems and the associated governance arrangements that can be supported by all partners. The complexity of achieving this would rise significantly if the number of partners increased and it is considered that an initial implementation is best done within the Grampian region, where organisations already work closely together and key decision makers have met regularly to develop this concept over the past 2 years.

    For organisations with charitable status (e.g. Universities), VAT levied on staff employed under some shared vehicle is an additional cost that cannot be reclaimed and will remain a significant barrier to participation. The first 17.5% efficiency savings on any staff costs are lost to VAT under these arrangements.

    Benefits projected from the project

    Through rationalisation and economies of scale, the project will achieve cost savings on ongoing operations, further savings through sharing of future development costs, and the provision of more comprehensive ICT services than would otherwise be possible with organisations acting individually. Specifically, disaster recovery planning and stronger IT security would be more affordably achieved. The adoption of a common communication and IT platform will create opportunities for more flexible working and collaboration across the region. This project is also a pre-requisite to the development of shared services and integrated business processes in other support areas - e.g. HR, Call Centres, Finance and Procurement. Taken to their full potential, these developments will benefit citizens in the region who would experience a truly integrated, proactive public service. A single call or single contact would handle any type of request for service.

    Estimated financial projections

    Total

    2005/6

    2006/7

    2007/8

    2008/9

    2009/10

    Overall project cost

    7,709

    120

    4,503

    2543

    543

    0

    Estimated projected benefits (for years beyond 2009/10 savings are predicted to increase marginally for no further cost - see Table B)

    13,339

    2,347

    4,450

    3,465

    3,086

    Cumulative Net Benefits

    -120

    -2276

    -369

    2544

    5630

    (to be verified through discovery phase)

    At this stage there are a number of options as to how the project could develop and its potential scale. The costs and benefits are therefore tentative figures to be verified at the discovery phase leading to a full business case in the phase 2 bid. The benefits would be continual.

    Is a pilot required - see guidance notes

    No.

    Additionally: why is EG funding required

    This project represents a radical restructuring of the way in which public sector ICT is delivered and requires substantial up front investment for implementation. It is unlikely that the local partners, although enthusiastic about the project, could afford the full initial investment.

    In addition, some of the significant issues to resolve will be those around governance and the change management of aligning systems and processes across different organisations. The profile and commitment of an EG funded initiative and the associated accountability to achieve milestones for the release of funds will in itself provide participating organisations with the focus to implement this project.

    Is this project complementary in any way to other EG work

    Yes, this project is fundamental to the achievement of key aims of the EG programme. The process of ICT integration planned for this project is a pre-requisite to achieving wider service integration across other support activities.

    Is "stage 2 development funding" requested?

    Yes. The level of detail required for a stage 2 bid will require a full analysis of IT delivery across participating organisations, and a detailed cost and service delivery model for the implementation of new arrangements and substantiation of anticipated benefits.

    This "discovery" phase will require the assistance of external consultants working with partner technical specialists.

    The sum of £120K is required in 2005/6 to cover this work.

    Part 2: Background and Context.

    Background.

    Over the past 3 years, the Grampian Joint Public Sector ICT Sub-Group has met on a number of occasions to consider opportunities for public sector organisations to work more closely together and what the potential benefits might be. The group concluded that there would be significant immediate benefits arising from the development of a common/shared ICT infrastructure that will service the needs of each individual organisation while facilitating future aspects of joined-up working, to the benefit of the regional community.

    The Stage 1 application in this document (re-submission) refers to the establishment of that common/shared ICT infrastructure. This Narrative Bid, for information, puts this bid into the context of a wider future vision that the ICT Sub-Group has developed and will be exploring further with other sub-groups within the overall Joint Public Sector Group.

    Overall Objectives

    Achievement of the principles of the Efficient Government programme will demand significant change to current support and administrative services. In recent years the application of new technology has delivered many process efficiencies within organisations, but opportunities for further improvement will be primarily through the integration and sharing of technologies and support services across public sector organisations. In addition to further efficiencies, this will bring real changes to the way in which frontline support services are delivered to the public. A single, shared ICT infrastructure, operating across a 'region' will be fundamental to the implementation of significant inter-organisation business process change in other areas.

    The initial priority of the Grampian Joint Public Sector ICT Sub-Group is therefore the development of a common/shared ICT infrastructure that will service the needs of each individual organisation while facilitating future aspects of joined-up working, to the benefit of the regional community.

    The longer-term vision is one of integrated services for local people with a proactive, customer-oriented approach that will deal with ALL their issues at a single point of contact. Integration will extend to many areas of service provision, eliminating duplication and significantly reducing operational and training costs. Such change could lead to a regional budget provision and organisation for the support of a range of local services.

    Essential Elements

    The initial project relates to the ICT infrastructure with the creation of a single data centre with common data storage, servers and communications network.

    This can be best explained through the concept of the 'Pyramid of Opportunity' that explains the major steps towards the radical change that this project will bring.

    Pyramid of Opportunity diagram

    The pyramid represents a ground upwards view of the various elements of the ICT Infrastructure showing their relative difficulties in terms of potential integration and sharing. At the base is the technological infrastructure foundation (the servers, routers, cabling, etc.) where the greatest degree of common requirements and shared protocols may be found. At the apex are both the organisation specific services that are unlikely to benefit from integration and also the common CRM solution that will be complex to achieve but where the rewards would be the full achievement of the goals of the Efficient Government programme.

    The project to achieve full integration would replicate the building of the Pyramid.

    Pyramid of Opportunity Step 1

    The first phase, for which this "stage 1" bid has been submitted, will lead towards the creation of a common data centre and electronic data storage repository. Common telecommunications networks (voice and data) will also be investigated and implemented in accordance with the long-term vision. Migration plans will be developed for each organisation to close their own operations and move them to the new data centre. Initially, the functions that will be moved across will be the commodity type IT services such as file and print services, e-mail, web-hosting, authentication, telephony and network management. Further migration will take place as part of the business process changes within step 3. As common telecommunications facilities are established, all public sector employees within Grampian will have common telephone and e-mail systems, facilitating further business process integration.

    The management and governance arrangements for this shared infrastructure would be established early on (see Step 2).

    Pyramid of Opportunity Step 2

    As part of STEP 1 there will be an early need to create a framework for ICT decision making and governance to be adopted by each participating organisation. This might start with the commencement of joint projects and the sharing of scarce specialist resources, but early on it is likely that the management of the shared infrastructure would have to be undertaken by a common body rather than by individual public sector organisations. This might require new organisational arrangements, perhaps with a strategic private sector partnership.

    Further benefits can be realised if the base ICT infrastructure is expanded to allow the sharing of common back-office systems coupled with sharing and restructuring of the relevant support departments and business processes (Finance, HR, Payroll etc). The public sector support-unit leaders will drive the necessary change, remodelling and re-engineering their processes to take advantage of the opportunity offered by the new ICT infrastructure.

    Pyramid of Opportunity Step 4

    Steps 1, 2 and 3 are largely concerned with arrangements for back office services. At the apex of the pyramid, there are opportunities to develop shared front-line services which directly interface with citizens and other end-users. Agreeing a shared approach to these services will be more difficult due to the different characteristics and needs of participating organisations. One example, however, would be the introduction of a common Citizen Relationship Management System. This would be a significant achievement for the public sector organisations within Grampian and the people served by them. The implementation of such a system would be complemented by a common (telephony) Call Centre where a single telephone number would gain access to a service co-ordinator that could accept queries and service requests across public sector organisations. The system would be replicated across each service interface channel (i.e. web, telephone, e-mail, mobile communication) such that the citizen can expect a comprehensive service, no matter how they wish to communicate with the regional public sector organisation.

    Implementation.

    The Joint Public Sector ICT Sub-Group considers that there are 3 key implementation phases for this vision:

    1. The establishment of a base shared ICT infrastructure (the subject of the Stage 1 bid to the Efficient Government Fund). The resourcing, management and governance arrangements for any shared organisation would be put in place at this stage.
    2. The establishment of shared back-office services which build on and take advantage of the shared ICT infrastructure.
    3. The establishment, where appropriate, of shared frontline citizen support services.

    The focus of activities to date has largely been around (1).

    Prior to each phase of the project, there will be significant preparatory work and detailed analysis required, and an understanding of current arrangements, costs, service levels and forward plans. In particular, agreement and support from business-unit leaders will be required and agreed requirements drawn up for organisations to align to shared common systems and business processes.

    External specialists would be contracted to assist with this work. An additional output would be a framework for future ICT decision making and spend that would be adopted by each of the participating partners.

    Compelling Reasons

    The local partners had been engaged in the Community Planning process for some time and had therefore worked methodically towards a joint view that the time was now right to make the step change that this project would entail.

    The project will require substantial funding. While the partners are keen to participate and in any case would be committing funding to it, the additional funding and profile of the Efficient Government programme will greatly increase the chances of success for this initiative.

    While it is only possible at this time to estimate what the costs and benefits will be, it's clear that this vision is fully aligned with the Efficient Government programme.

    The creation of an integrated ICT infrastructure is a key strategic starting point. If this change does not happen then the vision of integrated public service will be significantly more difficult to achieve.

    Benefits

    There are both direct benefits and added benefits that a project of this nature will bring.

    Efficiency savings will accrue from two sources:

    1. From an ICT context there will be direct benefits from the economies of scale that the integration will bring.
    2. The integrated ICT infrastructure will facilitate business process change leading to rationalisation of the computer systems in use and new, more efficient ways of working.

    The actual costs and savings are to be identified following a 'Discovery' phase where detailed information will be gathered on the current partner infrastructures. This information will be utilised to plan the new purpose-built data centre and identify which technologies will be reusable and which will need to be replaced. It is through this phase of work that the real costs and savings will be identified.

    The integration of business processes across the public sector will lead to improved service delivery to the citizens of Grampian. Through electronic data integration it can be ensured that citizens are not asked repetitively for the same information and can be communicated with proactively, with all their public services offered through a single point of contact. Similarly, citizen access to electronic service delivery via web portals will be enabled through common authentication facilities. The real benefits will be to these citizens who will receive significantly enhanced services funded through efficiency savings.

    Further benefits which are of significance are:

    1. Disaster Recovery ( DR)
      Rather than several public sector organisations making separate and independent arrangements for disaster recovery, the establishment of a shared ICT infrastructure allows DR facilities and provisions to be shared as well. This will both reduce costs and provide a level of disaster recovery that would otherwise probably be difficult to fund.
    2. Teleworking /Flexible Working Options.
      The set up of the new ICT infrastructure could be adapted to allow for a higher proportion of teleworking and other flexible working options. This would allow employees to work from home or other 'offices' connected to the network. This would not need to be specific to a single organisation. New network links would allow all public service employees more flexible access to the network and ICT-based services, across Grampian.
    3. Single Communications Infrastructure.

    All employees within the public sector would be connected via the same telephone and e-mail systems facilitating greater inter-working and collaboration.

    Justification of Cost Savings

    Through the operation of a shared infrastructure, specialist consultants have identified that substantial savings are achievable for this type of project. Mindful of such savings current "actuals" for each of the participants have been identified (Table A) and a cashflow table for the establishment of a common ICT infrastructure together with continuing operational costs has been prepared (Table B). These tables are the basis of the headline costs/savings outlined on page 2 of this submission.

    It should be noted that it is thought unlikely that all participants would attempt to transfer to a common ICT infrastructure at the same time. In reality, a likely scenario is that the participants would form 3 separate tranches and would convert at approximately 1-year intervals. Tables A and B are based on suggested tranches of:

    1. Aberdeen City, Grampian Fire and Rescue, Robert Gordon University.
    2. Aberdeenshire, Grampian Police, University of Aberdeen.
    3. Moray, Aberdeen College (plus any other late entrants)

    An example of the adoption of large-scale joint ICT inter-working is an innovative solution from Australia is the "G5" Councils on-line solution. This relates to a 10 year business transformation relationship that had a "Go Live" date of March 15 th 2004. This initiative attracted £54 million private sector funding offered in a 10-year PPP deal. The savings are expected to be between £120M and £140M over 10 years between the 5 Councils. This represents available savings of between 4 and 5% of budget per annum.

    The initial envisaged project described in this bid could develop into a wider project of this nature.

    The "G5" Syndicate Business case is already delivering significant savings in a number of areas:

    High Level Benefits

    • 5% improvement in the efficiency of development approvals
    • 1% efficiency improvement for half of all computer facing workforce
    • Exceeding the 1-2% productivity savings targeted from integrated applications c.f. disparate systems
    • 0.5% reduction in corporate overhead
    • 30% improvement in the efficiency of purchasing processes
    • 20% efficiency improvement in financial reporting
    • 10 to 20% improvement in the efficiency in HR administration
    • 40% reductions in call centre activity through the use of integrated CRM & Asset Management System and workflow

    Other Benefits

    • 25% reduction in inventory management effort
    • 10% reduction in asset maintenance costs
    • 20% reduction in contract management effort
    • 10% reduction in plant and fleet and materials costs
    • 10% reduction in property management work effort
    • 5% reduction off the value of purchases
    • 50% reduction in bank reconciliation work effort
    • 20% reduction in cycle time in regulation processes
    • 20% reduction in financial reporting work effort
    • 25% reduction in accounts receivable work effort
    • 20% reduction in cycle times in accounts payable processes
    • 20% reduction in records management and processing

    The detailed work planned for Phase 2 will help clarify the benefits achievable by the "Grampian Public Partnership".

    The following tables give some indicative savings based on what will be achievable in the early phases of the project. The evidence from the "G5 Syndicate" suggests that there is the potential in later phases for significantly more savings.

    Commitment of Partners

    The partners have been working together for over two years, investigating a number of different potential project areas where inter-working would be beneficial. The resultant bid has the support of all the partners highlighted earlier.

    There are however some constraints placed on full participation through the need for certain organisations to adhere to national initiatives and regulations that have the potential to conflict with a regional scheme.

    At present the participants can be categorised as follows:

    a. Those for whom there is no known reason why they could/should not participate in full joint working/networking:
    Local Authorities: Aberdeen City, Aberdeenshire, Moray.
    Higher Education: RGU, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen College.

    b. Those for whom there is no known reason why they could/should not participate in full joint working/networking but who are unable to commit because their future is under discussion/unknown:

    Grampian Fire and Rescue.

    c. Those whose existing operational policies and/or national strategies have the potential to conflict to a significant level with regional joint working/networking:
    Grampian Police - Government Secure Classification Scheme.

    (Note: Due to national NHS initiatives, NHS Grampian has indicated that they are unable to participate at this time.)

    Value Added Tax

    Higher Education ( HE) and Further Education ( FE) institutions have charitable status and are not therefore able to fully reclaim VAT charged on services supplied. It is possible that the delivery of shared services is best achieved through the establishment of a Special Purpose Vehicle ( SPV) (e.g. Company limited by guarantee) with staff transferred to that SPV. Services supplied by those staff to HE and FE institutions would, however, immediately be subject to VAT. Effectively, therefore, under any such arrangements HE and FE institutions must achieve 17.5% efficiency gains on the use of staff resources simply to "stand still".

    This is a significant barrier to participation for HE and FE institutions and erodes the potential benefits that can be achieved. The Joint Public Sector ICT Sub-Group would welcome some assistance in resolving this issue.

    TABLE A

    CURRENT ANNUAL CAPITAL

    In '000s

    Aberdeen City

    Aberdeen-shire

    Moray*

    Grampian Police

    Grampian Fire

    RGU

    University of Aberdeen

    Aberdeen College*

    City, Fire & RGU

    Shire, Police & Uni

    Moray & Coll

    New Investment in new Networking Technologies

    145

    170

    70

    260

    317

    143

    69

    1174

    462

    573

    139

    Network Maintenance

    0

    0

    0

    0

    New server and storage technologies

    500

    170

    70

    100

    6

    75

    304

    57

    1282

    581

    574

    127

    Server and storage maintenance

    43

    43

    43

    0

    0

    Additional data centre enhancements

    69

    50

    20

    6

    145

    75

    50

    20

    757

    390

    160

    360

    12

    392

    447

    126

    2644

    1161

    1197

    286

    CURRENT ANNUAL REVENUE

    Aberdeen City

    Aberdeen-shire

    Moray*

    Grampian Police

    Grampian Fire

    RGU

    University of Aberdeen

    Aberdeen College*

    City, Fire & RGU

    Shire, Police & Uni

    Moray & Coll

    New Investment in new Networking Technologies

    100

    40

    140

    0

    100

    40

    Network Maintenance

    117

    200

    80

    620

    5

    93

    85

    27

    1227

    215

    905

    107

    Network Support Staff

    206

    140

    40

    52

    10

    148

    132

    42

    770

    364

    324

    82

    New server and storage technologies

    60

    24

    2

    86

    2

    60

    24

    Server and storage maintenance

    221

    207

    83

    200

    3

    20

    22

    7

    763

    244

    429

    90

    Server/Storage Support Staff

    455

    245

    98

    52

    10

    156

    190

    52

    1258

    621

    487

    150

    Additional data centre costs

    26

    12

    70

    5

    113

    31

    70

    12

    Additional data centre staffing

    92

    240

    332

    92

    240

    0

    1025

    952

    377

    994

    35

    509

    669

    128

    4689

    1569

    2615

    505

    TABLE B

    GRAMPIAN PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP CASHFLOW

    STAGE 1 BID (RESUBMISSION) ('000s)

    2005/06

    2006/07

    2007/08

    2008/09

    2009/110

    2010/11

    2011/12

    CAPITAL

    Investment in consultancy

    120

    Capital expenditure Ab City, Gramp Fire & RGU

    1161

    383

    Capital expenditure Ab Shire, Gramp Police & U of Ab

    1197

    1197

    399

    Capital expenditure Moray, Ab Coll

    286

    286

    286

    95

    Capital costs to install infrastructure for Ab City, Gramp Fire & RGU

    2700

    Capital costs to add/combine infrastructure for Ab Shire, Gramp Police & U os Ab

    940

    Capital costs to add/combine infrastructure for Moray & Ab Coll

    240

    Capital cost to maintain GPP infrastructure.

    710

    1320

    1586

    1586

    1586

    2764

    4566

    2335

    1655

    1586

    1586

    1586

    REVENUE

    Revenue expenditure Ab City, Gramp Fire & RGU

    1569

    Revenue expenditure Ab Shire, Gramp Police & U of Ab

    2615

    2615

    Revenue expenditure Moray, Ab Coll

    505

    505

    505

    Revenue costs of operating infrastructure for Ab City,

    Gramp Fire & RGU

    1803

    Additional revenue costs to add/combine operations for Ab

    Shire, Gramp Police & U of Ab

    1603

    Additional revenue costs to add/combine operations for

    Moray & Ab Coll

    303

    Revenue cost to operate GPP infrastructure.

    1023

    2592

    2895

    2895

    2895

    4689

    4923

    3131

    2895

    2895

    2895

    2895

    VALUE OF ADDITIONAL BENEFITS

    Attributable to AbCity, Gramp Fire & RGU:

    Adoption of common systems where practicable

    30

    45

    55

    55

    55

    Estimate of benefits of CRM

    20

    40

    70

    100

    Estimate of value in better contingency capability

    10

    25

    35

    45

    55

    Attributable to Ab Shire, Gramp Police & U of A

    Adoption of common systems where practicable

    30

    45

    55

    55

    Estimate of benefits of CRM

    20

    40

    70

    Estimate of value in better contingency capability

    10

    25

    35

    45

    Attributable to Moray & Ab Coll

    Adoption of common systems where practicable

    7

    10

    15

    Estimate of benefits of CRM

    5

    10

    Estimate of value in better contingency capability

    7

    10

    12

    Total

    0

    0

    40

    130

    234

    325

    417

    Nett benefits

    -120

    -2156

    1907

    2913

    3086

    3177

    3269

    Cumulative Benefits

    -120

    -2276

    -369

    2544

    5630

    8807

    12076

    Additional Investment (Capital)

    120

    2700

    940

    240

    Ongoing Investment (Capital)

    2644

    1866

    1395

    1415

    1586

    1586

    1586

    Total Capital

    2764

    4566

    2335

    1655

    1586

    1586

    1586

    Additional Revenue

    1803

    1603

    303

    Ongoing Revenue

    4689

    3120

    1528

    2592

    2895

    2895

    2895

    Total Revenue

    4689

    4923

    3131

    2895

    2895

    2895

    2895

    Additional Benefit

    40

    130

    234

    325

    417

    2005/06

    2006/07

    2007/08

    2008/09

    2009/110

    2010/11

    2011/12

    Capital Savings

    -120

    -1922

    309

    989

    1058

    1058

    1058

    Revenue Savings

    0

    -234

    1558

    1794

    1794

    1794

    1794

    Additional Benefits

    0

    0

    40

    130

    234

    325

    417

    Total Savings/Benefits

    -120

    -2156

    1907

    2913

    3086

    3177

    3269

    Total Additional Costs

    120

    4503

    2543

    543

    0

    0

    0

    Total Anticipated Savings

    0

    2347

    4450

    3456

    3086

    3177

    3269

    Cumulative benefits

    -120

    -2276

    -369

    2544

    5630

    8807

    12076

    Cumulative costs to 2009/10

    120

    4623

    7166

    7709

    7709

    Cumulative benefits to 2009/10

    0

    2347

    6797

    10253

    13339

    Cumulative net benefits

    -120

    -2276

    -369

    2544

    5630

      Page updated: Thursday, February 23, 2006