Area of Efficiency | Aberdeen City | Moray Council | Grampian Police | Validation |
Reduce vandalism costs to public buildings. | £250,000 | £17,500 | | At this time quantifiable evidence to contribute a reduction to CCTV alone is not available. However, future savings made will be outwith the current public space systems. Portable systems along with other operational measures will be deployed on an intelligence led process. Evaluation will determine the time savings and effectiveness of CCTV. |
Alarm monitoring for Aberdeen Council. | £50,000 | To be quantified | | Forecast based on current information. |
Reduced Police time in vandalism investigation due to reduced incidence of crime. | | | 1400 staff hours in Moray =£35,000 | Based on before and after effects on vandalism but no method of attributing to CCTV directly. Evaluation process required to ascertain actual hours spent per incident and hours saved by CCTV deployment. |
Reduced Police time in car crime investigation due to reduced incidence of crime. | | | 680staff hours in Moray =£17,000 | Based on before and after effects on car crime but no method of attributing to CCTV directly. Evaluation process required to ascertain actual hours spent per incident and hours saved by CCTV deployment. |
Tactical resource deployment to improve staff management. | Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme | Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme | Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme | Absorbed into working practices and no current measures to identify actual time saved. Evaluation process required to ascertain actual hours spent per incident and hours saved by CCTV deployment. |
Centralisation of control rooms to a single site. | | | £175,000 | Estimated reduction in staffing costs due to centralisation. Staff are likely be redeployed within the organisations into existing vacancies. |
Network improvements and new technology. | | £3000 | | Reduced use of fixed fibres and shared use of capacity. Conservative estimate based on 10% reduction. |
Reduced time in incident searches of tapes by using digital technology. | | | 500 staff hours for Aberdeen and Moray =£12,500 | Non track able estimate based on experience. Tracking process can be developed in stage 2. |
Improved guilty pleas reducing court time, police time and expense including legal aid. | Potential savings identified by pilot scheme | Potential savings identified by pilot scheme | Potential savings identified by pilot scheme | No method of evaluating actual costs at this stage. However, tracking process will demonstrate what savings can be made within the justice process. |
Improved citizen reassurance by deploying CCTV under the terms of the Local Government (Scotland) Act, 2003 - duty to advance community well being. | Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme | Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme | Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme | Not possible to equate to actual costs or time savings at this stage, but evidence will be gathered, indicating the success of innovation and partnership within communities. |
Assist in the delivery of Antisocial Behaviour Outcome Agreements, to improve partnership enforcement and efficiency. | Potential savings identified by pilot scheme | Potential savings identified by pilot scheme | Potential savings identified by pilot scheme | Evidence can be sourced at Edinburgh where deployment of CCTV is used to (a) gather evidence for, and enforce Antisocial Behaviour Orders, and (b) to tackle environmental issues such as dog fouling and fly tipping. |
Potential for guaranteed income streams by monitoring alarms and other CCTV systems within the public and private sector. This will generate greater outputs with same inputs. | Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme | Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme | Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme | Evidence demonstrating the type of income streams can be sourced from other CCTV systems. That said, quantifiable evidence is not at hand. |