EGF - Stage 1 - 063 - Grampian CCTV - Bid

DescriptionSTATUS - UNSUCCESSFUL - To provide a centralised CCTV system deployed to meet the strategic and operational requirements of all the partners.
ISBN
Official Print Publication DateJuly 2005
Website Publication DateMarch 01, 2006

    Listen

    This document is also available in pdf format (158k)

    STAGE 1 APPLICATION

    Close Circuit Television Logo

    EFFICIENT GOVERNMENT FUND

    STAGE 1 APPLICATION - EXPRESSION OF INTEREST

    Bid number (for EG use)

    EGF 1/3/063

    Lead bidder

    North East CCTV Partnership.
    Contact Inspector Duncan Rennie, Grampian Police, Tel 01224 826586, email, Duncan.Rennie.@grampian.pnn.police.uk

    Brief description of the aims of the project

    Centralised CCTV system within the North East of Scotland, managed by the 'Partnership' under sound governance, guaranteed financial sustainability, deployed to meet the strategic and operational requirements of all the partners.

    Benefits are:

    • Efficient management and effective operational response to community based problems.
    • Positive co-ordinated contribution within a partnership framework to enhance community well being.
    • Design static and deploy mobile systems by using an intelligence led process, thereby targeting priority areas.
    • Increase outputs by using new technology to extend coverage and maximise time release by combining partnership resources.
    • Free up resources by using systems as a tactical and operational tool to, detect and deter crime, assess and gather information to provide quality evidence for court proceedings.
    • To promote efficiencies by creating a national pilot scheme.

    Clear description of what the EGF money would be used to buy

    To create a centralised monitoring facility and upgrade current systems from analogue to digital, thereby using new technology to improve on productive time. Introduction of mobile and portable units to improve deployment coverage, especially to communities where fixed networks are not financially viable.

    Partners to the project likely to commit resources

    The North East CCTV Partnership is to be formalised by a Minute of Agreement by the following partners:

    • Aberdeen City Council, Town House, Broad Street, Aberdeen, AB10 1FY.
    • Moray Council, Council Offices, High Street, Elgin, 1V30 1BX.
    • Grampian Police, Police Headquarters, Queen Street, Aberdeen, AB10 1ZA.

    Names of other organisations with whom the project has been discussed (to assist the introductions process)

    Aberdeenshire Council, Woodhill House, Westburn Road, Aberdeen.

    Members, through their Policy and Resources Committee, have decided not to join the partnership at this stage and will re-assess once the project is successfully implemented. Their participation would fully integrate CCTV across the region.

    Approaches have also been made to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and Aberdeen University. Their future involvement is still under consideration.

    Established Radio Links with retailers and publicans already provides operational benefits though information gathering, assessing incidents, identification of offenders and evidence for court. This will continue with a desire to further expand the involvement of the Drinks Industry in tackling the issues of anti-social drink related behaviour.

    Evidence that suggested approach has been deployed successfully elsewhere

    CCTV is deployed in many locations within the UK. Visits to 9 locations throughout the country have taken place. The focus being on structure, funding, capital/revenue costs, tangible benefits and identified efficiencies. These visits concluded that there is good evidence of partnership working, targeting of priority areas, systems being used as an effective operational tool to manage and free up resources. Nationally there is no direct detailed quantifiable evidence of the benefits of financial or time release savings. This bid offers the opportunity to build a project that quantifies these for future additional reference.

    Research commissioned by the Home Office and undertaken by Professor Gill, over a 3 year period at 14 separate systems, provides a good overview of the effectiveness of CCTV. Some of his concluding remarks indicate the way forward.

    • Too often CCTV has been judged on its ability to reduce crime rates, and often this will not be the best way of judging it.
    • CCTV is more than just a technical solution, it requires human intervention to work to maximum efficiency.
    • It has the potential, if properly managed, along side other measures and in response to specific problems, to help reduce crime and boost the public's feeling of safety.

    Proposals to develop this further are detailed under the following section entitled: why is EG funding required.

    Are there any restrictions to potential for enlargement of the project (ie technology, number of partners etc)

    None.

    Benefits projected from the project

    Narrative - see attached matrix - Appendix 'A'

    Estimated financial projections

    Total

    2005/6

    2006/7

    2007/8

    2008/9

    Overall project cost

    Capital expenditure
    2 million

    See Appendix B

    Capital 2 million

    Capital costs balance

    Estimated projected benefits

    See matrix

    Is a pilot required - see guidance notes

    As alluded to, quantifiable evidence is not available to support the operational benefits of the system. If this bid progressed to Stage 2 then mechanisms could be built in to achieve a 'snap shot' view of the effectiveness and efficiencies. However, the narrative below sets out the long term solution that will provide a structured and long term evaluation.

    Additionally: why is EG funding required

    The Home Office have commissioned and published their research into schemes within England. Recommendations by Professor Gill provides a framework to ensure new systems are more efficient.

    To progress this further there is a need to introduce a pilot scheme over a 1 - 2 year period with built in tracking processes to quantify the real benefits of CCTV from the viewing stage, through to the justice processes and wider community support, where clear benefits will be derived. Professor Gill is very supportive of this approach and has verbally agreed to become involved. Such a view is also supported by practitioners, who if invited, will participate to develop a national strategy towards CCTV deployment.

    It is recognised that this does not tightly fit the bid criteria and it is requested that consideration be given to a relaxation of the rules to meet this request. The alternative is to run a short term evaluation, during the stage 2, but this will produce lesser long term benefits and efficiencies.

    It is also proposed that the Justice Department participate within the pilot programme ensuring all aspects of CCTV effectiveness are assessed and from that the real tangible benefits of CCTV will be known. Such an approach will provide evidence for a national CCTV strategy and also provide efficiencies in how funds are directed to such projects.

    Does this project complementary in anyway to other EG work

    No.

    Is 'Stage 2 development funding' requested?

    Funding to support the design of the pilot process is required. This may necessitate consultancy support from researchers (as detailed above) and analytical support.

    APPENDIX 'A'

    FORECAST OF EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVE TIME SAVINGS

    Area of Efficiency

    Aberdeen City

    Moray Council

    Grampian Police

    Validation

    Reduce vandalism costs to public buildings.

    £250,000

    £17,500

    At this time quantifiable evidence to contribute a reduction to CCTV alone is not available. However, future savings made will be outwith the current public space systems. Portable systems along with other operational measures will be deployed on an intelligence led process. Evaluation will determine the time savings and effectiveness of CCTV.

    Alarm monitoring for Aberdeen Council.

    £50,000

    To be quantified

    Forecast based on current information.

    Reduced Police time in vandalism investigation due to reduced incidence of crime.

    1400 staff hours in Moray =£35,000

    Based on before and after effects on vandalism but no method of attributing to CCTV directly. Evaluation process required to ascertain actual hours spent per incident and hours saved by CCTV deployment.

    Reduced Police time in car crime investigation due to reduced incidence of crime.

    680staff hours in Moray =£17,000

    Based on before and after effects on car crime but no method of attributing to CCTV directly. Evaluation process required to ascertain actual hours spent per incident and hours saved by CCTV deployment.

    Tactical resource deployment to improve staff management.

    Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme

    Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme

    Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme

    Absorbed into working practices and no current measures to identify actual time saved. Evaluation process required to ascertain actual hours spent per incident and hours saved by CCTV deployment.

    Centralisation of control rooms to a single site.

    £175,000

    Estimated reduction in staffing costs due to centralisation. Staff are likely be redeployed within the organisations into existing vacancies.

    Network improvements and new technology.

    £3000

    Reduced use of fixed fibres and shared use of capacity. Conservative estimate based on 10% reduction.

    Reduced time in incident searches of tapes by using digital technology.

    500 staff hours for Aberdeen and Moray =£12,500

    Non track able estimate based on experience. Tracking process can be developed in stage 2.

    Improved guilty pleas reducing court time, police time and expense including legal aid.

    Potential savings identified by pilot scheme

    Potential savings identified by pilot scheme

    Potential savings identified by pilot scheme

    No method of evaluating actual costs at this stage. However, tracking process will demonstrate what savings can be made within the justice process.

    Improved citizen reassurance by deploying CCTV under the terms of the Local Government (Scotland) Act, 2003 - duty to advance community well being.

    Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme

    Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme

    Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme

    Not possible to equate to actual costs or time savings at this stage, but evidence will be gathered, indicating the success of innovation and partnership within communities.

    Assist in the delivery of Antisocial Behaviour Outcome Agreements, to improve partnership enforcement and efficiency.

    Potential savings identified by pilot scheme

    Potential savings identified by pilot scheme

    Potential savings identified by pilot scheme

    Evidence can be sourced at Edinburgh where deployment of CCTV is used to (a) gather evidence for, and enforce Antisocial Behaviour Orders, and (b) to tackle environmental issues such as dog fouling and fly tipping.

    Potential for guaranteed income streams by monitoring alarms and other CCTV systems within the public and private sector. This will generate greater outputs with same inputs.

    Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme

    Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme

    Potential benefits identified by pilot scheme

    Evidence demonstrating the type of income streams can be sourced from other CCTV systems. That said, quantifiable evidence is not at hand.

    APPENDIX B

    FORCECAST OF CAPITAL COSTS

    DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL SPEND

    CAPITAL COST
    £

    Centralised monitoring facility

    800,000

    Upgrade current network from analogue to digital

    552,000 (92 cameras at average cost of £6,000 per unit)

    Increase outputs by using:

    Fixed site cameras

    Mobile unit

    Portable units

    180,000 (10 cameras at average cost of £18,000 per unit)

    100,000 ( 1 van)

    100,000 ( 5 units at average cost of £20,000 per item)

    Strategic audit and specification development

    48,000 (consultancy costs)

    Project staff costs

    200,000

    Training

    20,000

    TOTAL

    2.000,000

    Note: The above capital costs are based on a industry average. Equipment has not been fully costed with suppliers and these figures are subject to formal estimate.

      Page updated: Thursday, March 02, 2006