Statistical Bulletin Criminal Justice Series - CrJ/2005/7: RECONVICTIONS OF OFFENDERS DISCHARGED FROM CUSTODY OR GIVEN NON-CUSTODIAL SENTENCES IN 1999, SCOTLAND

Listen

6. Changes in reconviction rates over time

6.1 The analysis in this section compares two-year reconviction rates for the 1999 cohort of offenders with those for the corresponding cohorts from 1995 to 2001. It also considers changes in reconviction rates over the financial years 1994-95 to 2000-01. The two year reconviction rates up to 2001 are considered to allow a comparison with the most recent data. However, in general, studies of reconviction which offer longer follow up periods are more reliable particularly for some specific offender groups, e.g. sexual offenders, where reconviction is more likely to be longer term.

6.2 When considering trends over time in reconviction rates, it should be borne in mind that these will be affected by changes in criminal justice policy and practice. For example, the increased use of alternatives to prosecution such as fiscal fines in the last 5-10 years will, other things being equal, tend to reduce reconviction rates. In addition, this analysis is based on unadjusted reconviction rates. It is important to note that reconviction rates may also be affected by the characteristics of each cohort group ( e.g. age, sex, index crime, index disposal etc).

6.3 Table 12 shows that over the period from 1995 to 2001, the overall two-year reconviction rate fell marginally from 45 per cent to 44 per cent. This trend was driven by a reduction in the reconviction rate for males (from 47 to 45 per cent). The reconviction rate for females remained fairly constant at around 34 per cent between 1995 and 1999, rising to 36 per cent in 2000 and 2001. This is driven by an increase in the reconviction rate for females aged under 25. The two year reconviction rate for females aged 21 to 25 was 37 per cent in 1995 and rose to 43 per cent in 2001.

6.4 For those with an index disposal of community service, the reconviction rate fell from 50 per cent for the 1995 cohort to 42 per cent for the 1999 cohort and has remained constant at 42 per cent between 1999 and 2001. The corresponding rates for custodial and probationary index disposals fell by 6 percentage points each between 1995 and 1999. These rates subsequently increase by 2 percentage points between 1999 and 2001.

6.5 The two year reconviction rate for those offenders with an index crime of violence decreased from 39 per cent in 1995 to 33 per cent in 1999 and rises slightly to 35 per cent in 2001. The corresponding rates for damage and breach of the peace fell by 3 and 6 percentage points respectively between 1995 and 1999 whilst the rate for drug offences has remained fairly steady across the five year period. The rates for damage and breach of the peace have since marginally increased in 2001. Conversely, the rate for those offenders with an index crime of dishonesty has increased from 50 percent in 1995 to 54 per cent in 1999 and continues to increase to 57 per cent in 2001.

Table 12: Offenders released from a custodial sentence or given a non-custodial sentence, 1995-2001
Percentage reconvicted within 2 years by sex and age

Sex by age

Percentage reconvicted within 2 years

Percentage with a custodial reconviction within 2 years

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Persons

45

44

43

43

42

44

44

14

14

13

14

14

15

15

under 21

58

57

54

54

53

55

54

18

17

17

17

17

18

17

21 to 25

48

47

46

46

47

48

49

16

16

15

16

17

19

19

26 to 30

44

44

42

43

42

43

45

15

15

14

15

16

16

17

over 30

33

33

32

32

31

32

32

9

9

9

9

10

10

11

Males

47

46

45

44

44

45

45

16

15

15

15

16

17

16

under 21

60

59

57

56

55

57

55

20

19

18

18

19

20

18

21 to 25

49

48

47

46

48

49

50

18

17

16

17

19

20

20

26 to 30

45

45

43

43

43

44

46

16

16

16

16

18

18

19

over 30

34

34

33

33

32

33

34

10

10

10

10

11

11

12

Females

34

33

34

35

34

36

36

5

5

6

5

6

7

7

under 21

38

39

39

39

40

43

42

5

5

6

7

10

10

10

21 to 25

37

35

39

40

40

42

43

8

7

7

7

7

8

10

26 to 30

37

36

37

38

38

38

40

6

7

7

5

7

7

8

over 30

28

27

27

28

26

28

27

4

4

4

3

3

4

4

Table 13: Offenders released from a custodial sentence or given a non-custodial sentence, 1995-2001
Percentage reconvicted within 2 years by index disposal and crime

Index disposal and crime

Percentage reconvicted within 2 years

Percentage with a custodial reconviction within 2 years

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

All offenders

45

44

43

43

42

44

44

14

14

13

14

14

15

15

Index disposal

Discharged from custody

66

64

62

61

60

61

62

48

44

42

43

43

44

44

Community service

50

48

45

43

42

42

42

17

16

14

13

13

14

13

Probation

64

61

59

58

58

60

60

29

26

23

23

24

25

26

Monetary

42

42

41

40

40

41

40

9

9

9

9

9

10

9

Other

34

34

33

32

31

33

32

7

8

7

6

7

8

7

Index crime

Violent crime

39

38

36

34

33

35

35

11

10

10

10

9

10

10

Sexual crime

18

16

17

19

17

16

17

7

6

7

7

5

5

5

Dishonesty

50

50

51

52

54

55

57

21

21

22

23

25

27

28

Damage

42

42

40

38

39

40

41

9

9

9

8

9

9

9

Drugs offences

39

40

39

40

39

39

38

10

10

10

10

11

10

11

Breach of peace

47

45

43

43

41

42

42

11

10

10

10

10

11

10

Other crimes and offences

47

46

44

44

42

43

44

16

15

15

14

15

15

15

6.6 The publication 'Building a better Scotland: Spending Proposals 2005-08' set out the Scottish Executive's spending plans and a series of targets for each department over this period. The targets for the Justice Department are intended to create safer and stronger communities and include 'a 2% reduction in reconviction rates in all types of sentence by March 2008'. This will focus on the percentage of offenders discharged from custody or given a non-custodial sentence in a given financial year who are reconvicted within two years. The baseline year will be 2003-04. Table 14 provides this information for 1994-95 to 2000-01 to illustrate the current trends.

6.7 There has been no change in the overall two year reconviction rate in the five year period between 1996-97 and 2000-01 although the rates have fallen and subsequently risen again in the intervening years. The two year reconviction rate has fallen in this period for all types of disposal except probation which has remained fairly constant. For those offenders with a custodial index disposal, the two year reconviction rate has fallen from 64 per cent in 1996-97 to 62 per cent in 2000-01. The corresponding rates for community service orders and monetary penalties have fallen by 4 percentage points and 2 percentage points respectively.

Table 14: Offenders released from a custodial sentence or given a non-custodial sentence, by financial year 1994-95 - 2000-01.
Percentage reconvicted within 2 years by index disposal and crime

Index disposal and crime

Percentage reconvicted within 2 years

1994-95

1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

All

45

45

44

43

42

43

44

Index disposal

Discharged from custody

66

65

64

62

61

61

62

Community service

50

49

47

44

42

42

43

Probation

53

64

60

59

59

59

60

Monetary

42

42

42

40

40

40

40

Other

34

34

33

33

31

31

33

Index crime

Violent crime

40

38

38

36

34

34

35

Sexual crime

22

16

15

15

19

16

19

Dishonesty

49

49

51

51

52

54

56

Damage

44

41

43

39

37

40

40

Drugs offences

37

40

39

39

39

39

39

Breach of peace

47

46

45

43

42

42

42

Other crimes and offences

47

48

45

43

45

43

43

Page updated: Monday, June 20, 2005