PAN 44: Fitting New Housing Development into the Landscape
DESIGN A - LANDSCAPE CAPACITY
i Landscape capacity is a measure of the degree of acceptable modification that the landscape can absorb. It embraces:
- the capacity or sensitivity of the landscape; and
- the potential of new elements to strengthen positive attributes (such as an attractive wetland area) and ameliorate the impact of elements which detract from the overall integrity of the landscape (for example, derelict buildings and degraded land).
ii Landscape capacity can be established by recording and integrating the natural features of the landscape such as the incidence and scale of valleys, woodland and so on. Essentially, capacity is a function of topography, ie landform and groundcover vegetation. The interplay of these can combine to create a landscape of high capacity, eg undulating with tree cover or low capacity, eg open, expansive and bare.
iii The character of the landscape is used to interpret its capacity to absorb development and can be described using a standard vocabulary and associated plans, sketches and photographs. This approach is adopted in the former Countryside Commission for Scotland guidelines on landscape assessment which provides a useful reference.
iv Generally speaking, undulating and complex topography will create opportunities to absorb new development as will wooded or afforested areas. This will not be the case with flat lowland landscapes or open and expansive upland landscapes.
v The principles of landscape analysis can be applied to the landscape around a settlement in order to come to a view about the capacity of a landscape to absorb further development. Equally, this process could be used to establish planting guidelines to assist in ameliorating the impact of existing developed areas.
vi A variety of layouts are tested against the analysis criteria. The better arrangements are worked up further until an optimum proposal for the site emerges. On this hypothetical site the comfortable landscape capacity for housing development is achieved by developing two zones as shown on the adjacent plan.

|
Level ground minimises the capacity of the landscape to absorb development. Variable topography and mature vegetation affords an increased capacity, offering landform screening thereby maximising the visual capacity of the landscape. |

| 
|
Buildings arranged parallel or perpendicular to the contours appear to complement the topography. Those arranged in a more random fashion present an awkward appearance. | Buildings seen against the sky can create greater visual impact. This can appear visually intrusive or can be used to good effect for important public buildings. Buildings seen against a solid backdrop are more easily integrated with the landscape |
(1) A larger area on the gently sloping land to the east is developable as a direct extension of the inner part of the original settlement. (2) A. smaller ribbon area to the south extending the lochside development immediately below the hill. | 
|
DESIGN B - URBAN STUDIES: STRUCTURE & HIERARCHYi Part A of this manual stressed the importance of structure in the urban form which is critically related to hierarchy of buildings. Hierarchy here means the size and setting of buildings in relation to their public importance, the relative significance of streets and spaces within neighbourhoods. Structure refers to a planned framework within which a hierarchy of buildings and places can be understood.
ii Today most suburban developments suffer from the absence of both structure and hierarchy. In many recent developments, current practice has attempted to redress this issue. However, it is not solely a design matter and whereas it is well understood which design parameters need to be addressed, this issue is critically related to scale and density.

| 
| 
|
Typical developer's layout of monotonous regularity with no focal points, structure or hierarchy of space | Layout more typical of much public sector housing - irregular, uneconomic and lacking identity | Urban layout showing a distinct structure and hierarchy of streets and spaces |

| 
|
Structure and hierarchy of buildings | Structure and hierarchy of spaces |
DESIGN C - URBAN STUDIES: SCALE AND DENSITYi Scale and density vary with development objectives, for example, the nature of' a development could be individual villas which is likely to lead to low density. On the other hand the objective could be to create flats and sheltered housing which is likely to lead to a high density. The key to successful development is to minimise uniform densities. It is important to avoid mono-use, mono-scale and mono-density, which leads to lack of identity and lack of legibility.
ii This is the central reason for the creation of modern developments which have no sense of place. Successful neighbourhoods have focal points of community activity within them, such as shops, village hall, parish church, library etc. Larger new developments must not only incorporate other uses at the outset but also allow space for neighbourhood activities to evolve once the community becomes established.
iii Use, scale and density can vary throughout a development and it is the blend of these factors which is important in order to achieve the objectives of structure and hierarchy. Generally, developments should be more dense at the centre and less dense at the edge. This helps to create a focus and a traditional physical structure that is readily "understood".
iii If the principles of structure and hierarchy are balanced with scale and density, then it is quite possible to create a balanced community of old and young people through a mix of unit size and a mix of tenure.
iv A balanced mix and tenure will also generate a range of patterns of activity from different community groups which leads to varied patterns of activity across the day. This maximises opportunities for social interaction and promotes passive supervision of the housing area. The desirability of achieving such objectives is well documented and forms the subject of much current urban design research.
Low buildings - village scale | Tall buildings - city scale |

| 
|

| 
| 
|
Large scale buildings -suitable for buildings of public significance, for example. | Domestic buildings - typical scale for a single family residence. | Traditionally the pattern of density in towns has had a concentration of central development with a thinning towards the peripheral areas. |
DESIGN D - URBAN STUDIES: HEIGHT AND MASSING
Height and massing flows from structure and hierarchy. In part it is borne out of the mix of housing, size and tenure which is proposed. For example height is directly related to the type of property. Flats tend to be higher - frequently 4 storeys - and they can also be grouped to create urban squares. On the other hand, detached villas with a much lower density would not normally exceed 2 or 2.5 storeys. Today massing is often dictated by road layout.
Impact of massing on elevations | Impact of massing on site layout |

| 
|