NEWS RELEASE
JOINT STAFFING WATCH SURVEY: MARCH 2002
This document is also available in pdf format (144k)
The March 2002 Joint Staffing Watch Survey was published jointly with the June 2002 Survey, which is available on the Scottish Executive website at www.scotland.gov.uk/jointstaffingwatch, or on request from the address at the back of this report. The Junes report includes details of the changes in staffing levels over time.
TECHNICAL NOTES
Background to the Joint Staffing Watch
t.1 A key purpose of the Joint Staffing Watch Survey is to provide meaningful information on overall local authority staffing levels by service and salary band, and to provide comparative information, particularly on relative levels of senior staff numbers, and of numbers of staff in central and corporate management roles. In particular, the surveys:
- Identify staff numbers within each of 17 separate service categories.
- Provide full-time equivalent staff numbers in each of five salary bands, designed to separately identify senior managers, middle managers and equivalent professionals, clerical staff and staff employed under manual terms and conditions.
- Provide estimates of full-time equivalent staff numbers based on actual hours worked, rather than by applying an FTE conversion factor to part-time.
- Identify staff in authorities' DLO/DSO services as a separate category, rather than grouping DLO/DSO staff with the services they mainly support.
t.2 This press release shows full details of staff numbers by salary band for each council within each of the main local authority services. While these detailed tables provide useful comparative information, they must be used with care. Relative percentages based on small total numbers can be misleading. Differences between authorities in staffing levels by grade and service may be due to a number of factors, including different needs for the services provided, and different arrangements within the authority for providing for these needs (for example through different types of joint arrangement). Authorities, themselves, are best placed to address detailed queries on what may lie behind any of the differences shown.
Response to the Joint Staffing Watch
t.3 A number of authorities/joint boards experienced difficulties in supplying estimates for the JSW.
t.4 As in the previous quarters, local authorities are keen to ensure that the figures supplied for March 2002 are as accurate as possible and are subject to careful scrutiny. This process can lead to some revisions to earlier quarters' data. Such revisions are incorporated in the figures contained in this report. For example, Aberdeen City introduced a new payroll system in early 2001 which has impacted on the accuracy of their reported figures: - it should be noted that for the purpose of the report we are using the June 2002 data for March 2002 and December 2001. The December 2000 data has been used for all periods up till and including September 2001. For Education (teachers) we have had to vary this due to issues surrounding the accuracy of both the September 2000 and December 2000 surveys. Hence, June 2002 data is used for September and December 2001 and March 2002 and June 2000 data is used for September and December 2000 and March and June 2001.
t.5 In addition, variance can be caused by changes in the classification of staff by service, or by the transfer of function. This can be seen for DLO/DSO departments, for example, where staff are reclassified to/from other service groups, or where the service is no longer provided by staff who are on the payroll of the authority. The transfer of staff partly explains the large changes of staffing levels over the year to March 2002 for Art, Sports and Leisure, Housing and Non-Teaching Education staff. Some authorities also noted temporary changes in staff levels, such changes explain in part the fall in the number of DLO/DSO staff (FTE) between March 2001 and March 2002.
t.6 Variations in definition can lead to apparent differences between the figures produced in the Joint Staffing Watch (JSW), and those published elsewhere. For example, the teacher figures recorded in the JSW include pre-school teachers, whereas those included in the School Census do not; figures for pre-school teachers are collected and published elsewhere. In addition, the School Census covers the number of teachers working during a certain week, whereas the JSW covers those in paid employment. This difference affects the way in which supply teacher cover is recorded (e.g., if a permanent teacher on sick leave is replaced by a supply teacher, the School Census would include just one teacher, whereas the JSW is concerned with the number of staff employed by local authorities, and would, therefore, include both).
The salary bands
t.7 The purpose of separately distinguishing staff numbers by salary band is to provide a clearer description of relative staffing structures. For most of the staff covered, the salary bands used are based on points on the local government employee pay scale. The use of salary bands based on points on this pay scale allows comparisons to be made over time, unaffected by any general increases in pay. The salary bands used in the surveys do not relate directly to salary pay scales under which staff are appointed by local authorities. Where overlap occurs between pay scales and bands used for this survey, staff, as a result of incremental progression, may move into a higher band as recorded by the survey. Care, therefore, requires to be exercised in interpreting movements in band numbers as recorded under this survey.
t.8 The salary bands used are defined as follows:-
Band A1: Chief Officers and staff paid at or above spinal column point 66 on the local government pay scale. In March 2002, these staff were earning 50,261 per year or above.
Band A2: Other chief officers and staff paid between spinal points 50 and 65 on the local government pay scale. In March 2002, these staff were earning between 34,742 and 49,082 per year.
Band B: Staff paid between spinal points 31 and 49 on the local government pay scale. In March 2002, these staff were earning between 21,536 and 33,983 per year.
Band C: Staff paid between spinal points 3 and 30 on the local government pay scale. In June 2001, these staff were earning up to 20,897 per year.
Other: This covers staff mainly employed under local authorities' manual terms and conditions of service.
The Scottish Executive / The Convention of Scottish Local Authorities
August 2003
Enquiries on the Joint Staffing Watch Survey should be addressed to:
Siân Morgan
The Scottish Executive
1-F, Victoria Quay
Edinburgh
EH6 6QQ
Tel. (0131) 244 0439
Email: DD Environment.Statistics@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
The latest version of the Joint Staffing Watch can be viewed on the Scottish Executive website at: www.scotland.gov.uk/jointstaffingwatch
TABLES
Table 1: Estimated number and full-time equivalent number of staff employed by Scottish local authorities: March 2002
Table 2: Recent trends in local authority staffing: Full-time equivalent staff numbers by service
Table 3: Changes in reported total full-time equivalent staff by local authority service
Table 4: Changes in reported total full-time equivalent staff by salary band
Table 5: Total full-time equivalent staff by service : March 2002
Table 6: Total full-time equivalent staff per 1,000 population by service : March 2002
Table 7: Full-time equivalent staff (i) by salary band (ii) (iii) in March 2002
Table 8: Full-time equivalent staff (i) per 1,000 population by salary band (ii) (iii): March 2002
Table 9: Number and percentage of non-manual (i) FTE staff by salary band (ii) (iii) : March 2002
Table 10(a): Corporate Services: March 2002
Table 10(b): Central Support Services: March 2002
Table 10(c): Planning and Economic Development: March 2002
Table 10(d): Other Education Staff: March 2002
Table 10(e): Social Work: March 2002
Table 10(f): Housing: March 2002
Table 10(g): Roads & Transport: March 2002
Table 10(h): Arts, Sport & Leisure: March 2002
Table 10(i): Libraries, Museums & Galleries: March 2002
Table 10(j): Environmental Services: March 2002
Table 10(k): DLO/DSO: March 2002
Chart 1: Total full-time equivalent staff per 1,000 population: March 2002
Download tables as Excel spreadsheet