Register to receive email news alerts, daily digest, weekly roundup or Topic newsletters.
Listen
Steven Hope
NFO System Three SOCIAL RESEARCH
This document is also available in pdf format (832k)
1. Introduction 1.1 Background to the survey
2. Sampling2.1 Sampling frame2.2 Accuracy and completeness2.3 Multiple dwellings2.4 Overall sample structure2.5 Primary sampling unit and cluster size2.6 Procedures for dealing with very small EDs2.7 Stratification by local authority area2.8 Stratification within local authority areas2.9 Procedures for allocating PSUs (and interviewer assignments) evenly throughout the calendar year2.10 Respondent selection
3. Data collection methods and instruments 3.1 Use of Computer Aided Personal Interviewing (CAPI)3.2 Questionnaire development and changes3.3 Fieldwork3.4 Questionnaire structure, length and content
4. Response rates, achieved sample profile and weighting4.1 Achieved sample size4.2 Household response rate4.3 Random adult response rate4.4 Achieved sample profile and weighting issues4.5 Data quality and comparisons with external sources4.6 Summary of weights required
5. Confidence intervals and complex standard errors
6. Questionnaire for the 2001 SHS
Appendix 1 - Scottish MOSAIC
The Scottish Executive Statistical Services
Table 2-1 Small EDs encountered in sampling by local authority area: SHS 2001 Table 2-2 Projected two-year achieved sample size by local authority area: SHS 2001/2002 Table 2-3 Procedure for allocating PSUs by month of fieldwork Table 4-1 Achieved interviews by local authority area by month in which sample was issued, SHS 2001 (based on month of issue, not date of interview) Table 4-2 Summary of outcomes at issued addresses for the 2001 SHS Table 4-3 Household response rate, targets and invalid addresses by local authority: 2001 Change in response rates between 1999/2000 and 2001 Table 4-4 Random adult response rate as percentage of valid addresses and of achieved household interviews: SHS 2001 Table 4-5 Weights to account for 'under'/'over' sampling and differences in response rates by local authority by quarter: SHS 2001 Table 4-6 Average weighting factors to adjust for differences in random adult response rates by local authority Table 4-7 Comparison of weighted and unweighted age and sex profile of 2001 SHS data with GRO(S) estimates Table 4-8 Comparison of key variables between the 1996 SHCS and the 2001 SHS Table 4-9 Comparison of key variables relating to driving and transport Table 4-10 Comparison of the proportion of SHS sampled households in each urban/rural category (plain text) with the proportion of all Scottish households in each category (bold) Table 4-11 Comparison of economic activity variables among adults of working age Table 5-1 Design effects and confidence intervals for key variables in 2001 data
Page updated: Friday, April 07, 2006