Future of Scotland's Health
First Minister
Jack McConnell made a major speech on the
Executive's health policy at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee on
Tuesday, February 11, 2003.
Full text.
Ninewells is a hospital where the dedication and skill of
everyone who works here makes a difference to the lives of
patients and their families - every day.
And it is a hospital where the skill and determination of
its staff - working alongside partners in the medical schools
and research institutions, in primary care, in the community,
in local authorities and with the local voluntary sector -
removing the barriers to good health, and eradicating disease.
Not only in Scotland - but for people across the world.
Can I thank Peter Bates and his Health Board colleagues for
their help in making my visit possible.
Much more importantly, I want to thank them for the hard
work they have put in to work alongside their health colleagues
and community partners to tackle problems and drive up
standards of care across Tayside. You have made a difference
and there are lessons here for public services elsewhere in
Scotland.
Fifty-five years ago we created the National Health Service.
At that time Aneurin Bevan expected that demand would decline
as the Service made its impact felt on the nation's health.
But advances in medical research and treatment have opened
up the realistic possibilities of tackling disease and ill
health on a scale unimaginable then. These advances keep more
of us alive and for longer - creating new demands on health
care provision.
But more than that, as citizens we have failed to take real
responsibility for our own health.
Despite medical advances, despite the care and treatment
available from a national health service - in Scotland we still
have some of the worst health statistics in Europe. Statistics
that show that we are still suffering and dying from the key
killer diseases of cancer, heart disease and stroke. Statistics
that show that our younger generations lead worryingly
unhealthy lives.
It is our recognition of that which has lead to the renewed
focus on health improvement - tackling Scotland's national
health alongside our drive to improve our national health
service.
Our health improvement campaign will not provide any kind of
quick fix. We will not see overnight changes in eating habits
or exercise.
And government on its own - no matter how many campaigns we
run - will not deliver the changes needed.
Only you and I can do that. It is the right thing to do and
we will commit long-term to the promotion of healthy eating and
regular physical exercise.
But improving our health service is not onlyabout medical or
social care - whether we find that in the GP surgery or the
hospital or the community. It is also about improving the
standards of social care, bringing services to where people are
so that they can live more of their lives in their own homes or
near to their families.
Reducing the number of people in hospital beds, caring for
them in the community, or in local health facilities. Not just
lengthening life - but improving the quality of life.
And we will continue to drive up national standards in
cleanliness, workforce planning and patient care. We will
continue to improve inspection and audit and invest in staff
wages and conditions.
All of these areas - taking responsibility for the future
health of Scotland, addressing the serious issues around
quality of life and social care - all are vitally important.
And we will continue to take national action for our National
Health Service.
But, today I want to concentrate my remarks on acute and
primary care.
In 1999, responsibility for Scotland's health service was
devolved to the new Scottish Parliament. We have had some
important successes in that time.
- Death rates from our key killer diseases, including
cancer, heart and stroke have fallen - including a 25% drop
in deaths from coronary heart disease
- We have delivered the largest ever hospital building
programme - and upgraded GP surgeries, A&E facilities
and local health centres
- We have targeted initiatives and investment to bring
the facilities of the HCI hospital in Clydebank into NHS
Scotland to tackle orthopaedic demand
- Our cancer strategy, backed by investment is making
real inroads in our fight against this disease
- We have seen a four fold increase in the number of
single visit centres where you receive a speedy
consultation, tests, results, diagnosis and if appropriate,
treatment - all in a single visit
- And, step by step, we are investing in the wages,
career structures, training and conditions of the 136,000
people who work in our National Health Service
So we have made progress - but not enough and not fast
enough.
Our health budget here in Scotland has increased in the 4
short years since devolution from 4.6 billion (1998/99) to 6.7
billion (2002/03). More than ever before, with real
achievements delivered as a result.
But we all know that there is much more still to do.
That is why the UK government will increase National
Insurance by 1 per cent in April - to fund a step change in
health spending by 2007.
That investment is much needed and it starts to happen in
just two months from now.
Scottish taxpayers and patients in our health service will
rightly expect to see real change and real improvement. We need
to meet their expectations.
We need reform to match investment - but we need reform to
go with the grain of Scotland.
To put patients first we need to streamline management, cut
out bureaucracy and support frontline health staff.
So I believe that it is time to change the structures inside
the NHS nationally and locally. Not to disrupt the service, but
to clarify responsibility and cut out unnecessary tiers of
bureaucracy which do not drive up standards or improve quality.
We must bring the decision-making closer to the patient and
there must be no buck- passing in the face of poor
performance.
I want to give primary care - local GPs and the health care
staff who work with them - a stronger role. Responsibility in
the redesigning of services and decisions on the best use of
resources.
Malcolm Chisholm will bring forward proposals soon to
streamline management and devolve decision making and budgets
to local hospitals and local health care units.
Structures are important because they can be barriers to
integrated care, to devolved decision making and to effective
service delivery.
But patients are, and must be, at the centre of our
ambitions.
On waiting times, we will honour our guarantees. What
matters most is that those in pain or distress are treated
within a reasonable time. Step by step, we are bringing down
the longest waits for the key surgical procedures.
So our guarantee will make sure that you will get the
operation you need. NHS paid for care, whether from the health
service or the private sector, in Scotland or elsewhere in the
UK, or Europe. You will get the operation you need - and you
will get it on time.
Let me spell out the next steps.
From next month in cardiac surgery no one will wait more
than 6 months from the point of diagnosis to surgery. And from
2004, we will extend that guarantee to 18 weeks or less from
diagnosis to surgery.
For everyone with a nine month waiting target for surgery,
we will turn that into a guarantee by December 2003.
And as we bring in the additional staff we need to build
capacity into the service, we will systematically asses the
situation for each specialism and incrementally reduce that
nine month guarantee to six months for all by 2005 or
earlier.
So we will deliver not just targets, but a real guarantee.
Not a promise before an election, but a fundamental right for
the future.
Making the money work for the patient, delivering what is
required.
Now I know from my post-bag, my constituency surgery and my
day to day experience that this is only part of the story.
In many cases the real delay is in the wait for that first
outpatient appointment. The focus on both lower waiting lists
by March 2002 and now lower waiting times, has led to delayed
action on outpatient waiting.
That has to change.
Malcolm Chisholm and I agreed last year that it was time to
address the delay in outpatient waiting and the real distress
it causes. He instructed the new Centre for Change and
Innovation to give priority to tackling this area, where action
in Scotland is long overdue.
It was time to act - and today I can confirm that action is
underway.
We have begun a major piece of work to shorten waiting
times, increase patient choice and improve access to
clinics.
The work is lead by the clinicians and staff themselves. It
is they who will identify the solutions we need to bring down
waiting times - using new technology to improve the booking
system, better management of lists and more flexible use of
professional staff to deliver treatment.
The result of their efforts will be published in the coming
weeks and all Health Boards across Scotland will be required to
implement their recommendations.For outpatients, we will take
the following steps.
- We will accelerate by one year, the current target of
26 weeks for an outpatient consultation - to reach that 26
week target by 2005.
- And we will introduce a better and more accurate system
of recording and monitoring the number of people waiting
for an outpatient appointment to support this.
These are minimum targets and we will monitor and publicly
report progress on each. And we will bring them down, one by
one, as we build additional capacity and expertise into our
health service.
These are three realistic and practical steps to put
outpatients higher in our priorities than they have been until
now.
I believe we face two major challenges which should guide
our drive to improve Scotland's NHS.
- We need to deliver all services as near to where people
live as is clinically appropriate
- And we need to deliver services quickly - not because
that is more convenient or makes good headlines. But
because the right diagnosis, treatment and care delivered
quickly and well, improves lives and very often, saves
lives.
This focus on what the patient needs lies at the heart of
the White Paper we will publish in the coming weeks.
Take the patient who goes to the optician for a routine eye
test and is told that they may be developing cataract problems.
The optician has to write to the GP. The person has to go and
see the GP. The GP has to write to the consultant and the
person has to wait for the appointment to see the consultant.
All of that to confirm what the optician spotted weeks before -
and we still haven't got to the discussion on treatment
yet.
Now I accept that this may be too simplistic a
characterisation of the situation. But it is one that too many
patients - and many health service staff will recognise as
accurate.
We need a health service which across the country
streamlines this process - takes the patient from diagnosis to
treatment faster and more effectively. A system that makes best
use of technology to move the information faster and move the
patient around less.
In Lothians, Glasgow and here in Tayside we've taken the
first steps for new diagnostic and treatment centres at a local
level. These will speed up the patient's journey, bring down
waiting times and deliver better health care. We are determined
to see these facilities develop right across Scotland and I
expect Health Boards to make them a priority.
Fifty-five years ago the National Health Service was created
around three founding principles.
Universal in reach - available to anyone who wanted to
use it.
High quality in provision - applying the latest
knowledge and the highest professional standards.
Available on the basis of
need, without regard for ability to pay.
I am as committed today to those founding principles as a
generation of British people were to the NHS when it began in
1948.
But we are building a health service for this new century
and it must be a health service that takes those principles and
applies them to the demands that we face today.
Comprehensive in principle - but dynamic, flexible,
individual and creative in its application. Delivering choice
as well as clinical expertise - meeting the challenges of our
modern society.
- A health service where the speed and the quality of
your care will not depend on where you live or how much you
can pay.
- A health service where, as a patient, you are involved
and consulted about your treatment.
- A service where safety, cleanliness and quality are
paramount.
- Where you are treated promptly and professionally and
as close to your home and your family as your clinical
needs permit.
- It will be a health service where staff can focus on
using their professional skills - not on filling out forms
or following a regime they had no part in designing.
- A health service where everyone who works in it, is
consulted and valued and allowed to get on with the job
they are trained to do. And where technology and management
supports them to do that.
That health service is more than good facilities and
buildings, more even than high professional standards.
That health service is founded on treating all those who use
it and work for it as individuals and involving them in
designing the service to meet their particular needs.
Yes, we need investment for to build that health service -
but we also need reform.
Reform to:
- provide the right care to patients at the right time
and in the right place
- increase patient choice
- break down old, traditional, professional barriers and
maximise the skills of all clinical staff
- use the latest technology to increase accessibility and
improve the quality of care
- and reform to put decision making in the hands of those
best placed to take the decisions.
Investment and reform; both are needed. They go hand in hand
because we have the potential to break new boundaries, improve
and extend lives, make a real difference.
That is a very exciting challenge, and together I know we
can do it.
News Archive